Family Influence "Choice of STEM careers” (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) in high school students.
Abstract
Society experiences scientific and technological changes that are forcing economies to focus their attention on the development of human capital with a profile in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). This article aims to demonstrate the influence of the family (mother or guardian father or guardian and siblings) on the choice of STEM careers in high school students during their second and sixth semester, since choosing a career is an individual and family decision. A total of 1,759 students from six different high schools were interviewed, through a non-probabilistic sampling, by quotas. The results show that the mother or guardian is the figure that most influences the choice of a STEM career compared to the father or guardian. It was thought that siblings could have a greater effect on students, however, the results show that it is not significant that they have siblings or that siblings can influence their choice. However, it is necessary to go deeper into the study of older brothers who graduate from STEM degrees and the effect this has on the younger brother’s election, an aspect that was not addressed in the investigation. The study did not delve into variables such as the type of career and the labor role played by parents and whether or not it is related to STEM areas. In conclusion, families must carry out non-formal activities that help awaken interest in science and increase their cultural capital from an early age.
Downloads
References
Avendaño, Rodríguez, K.C, Magaña, Medina, D. E., & Aguilar, Morales, N. (2017). Análisis factorial exploratorio del cuestionario interés por estudios universitarios en áreas STEM (I-STEM). Revista de Análisis Cuantitativo y Estadístico, 4(13), 54–68.
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering Curricula in Early Education: Describing the Landscape of Open Resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), n2.
Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American psychologist, 56(10), 781.
Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation.
Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley journal of sociology, 32, 1-17.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Capital cultural, escuela y espacio social. Coyoacán, México, Siglo XXI.
Bratcher, W. E. (1982). The influence of the family on career selection: A family systems perspective. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 61(2).
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723.
Cerinsek, G., Hribar, T., Glodez, N., & Dolinsek, S. (2013). Which are my future career priorities and what influenced my choice of studying science, technology, engineering or mathematics? Some insights on educational choice—case of Slovenia. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2999-3025.
Chandler, F. T., & Parsons, S. (1995). A Case Study of a Mother/Daughter Science Club.
Chen, X. (2009). Students Who Study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Postsecondary Education. Stats in Brief. NCES 2009-161. National Center for Education Statistics.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98.
Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D. and Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97(3), 395-409.
Early Childhood STEM Working Group. (2017). Early STEM matters: Providing high-quality STEM experiences for all young learners. Chicago (IL): UChicago STEM Education and Erikson Institute.
Emslie, C., & Hunt, K. (2009). ‘Live to work’or ‘work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work–life balance among men and women in mid‐life. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 151-172.
Garriott, P. O., Raque-Bogdan, T. L., Zoma, L., Mackie-Hernandez, D., & Lavin, K. (2017). Social cognitive predictors of Mexican American high school students’ math/science career goals. Journal of Career Development, 44(1), 77-90.
Gregory, A., & Milner, S. (2009). Work–life balance: A matter of choice?. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 1-13.
Guillaume, C., & Pochic, S. (2009). What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and the work-life balance. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(1), 14–36.
Han, X., & Appelbaum, R. P. (2018). China’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) research environment: A snapshot. PloS one, 13(4).
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899-906.
Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2017). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 655-675.
Jant, E. A., Haden, C. A., Uttal, D. H. and Babcock, E. (2014). Conversation and object manipulation influence children’s learning in a museum. Child development, 85(5), 2029-2045.
Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461-481.
Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good Jobs Now and for the Future. ESA Issue Brief# 03-11. US Department of Commerce.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C. and Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1400-1488.
Manzano, A., Zamora, S., & Salvador, R. (2010). Sistema de ecuaciones estructurales: una herramienta de investigación. Ciudad de México.
McCarthy, B., Li, L., Tiu, M., Atienza, S. and Sexton (2015). Learning with PBS KIDS: A study of family engagement and early mathematics achievement.
Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–223.
National Academy of Sciences. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy of Sciences. doi.10.17226/18612
National Science Board. (2016). Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. National Science Board, 897.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO). (2019). Women in Science. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs55-women-in-science-2019-en.pdf
Organización para la Cooperaión y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) /Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) /Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina (CAF). (2015). Perspectivas Económicas De América Latina 2016. Hacia una nueva asociación con China. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
Peterson, A., Gaskill, M., & Cordova, J. (2018). Connecting STEM with Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Curriculum in Elementary Education. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference .1212-1219. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Recuperado de https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182681/
Rehm, M. (1990). Vocation as personal calling: A question for education. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 114-125.
Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656-664.
Rojko, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 concept: background and overview. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 11(5), 77-90.
Sheehan, K. J., Hightower, B., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2018). STEM Media in the Family Context: The Effect of STEM Career and Media Use on Preschoolers' Science and Math Skills. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 17.
Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383-1395.
Vázquez Alonso, Á., & Manassero Más, M. A. (2015). La elección de estudios superiores científico-técnicos: análisis de algunos factores determinantes en seis países. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 12(2), 264. doi: 10498/17251
Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. The Journal of experimental education, 75(3), 167-202.
Watt, H. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J., Morris, Z. A., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017). Mathematics—A critical filter for STEM-related career choices? A longitudinal examination among Australian and US adolescents. Sex Roles, 77(3-4), 254-271.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
