Technological Use, Didactic Intentionality and Attitudes towards Learning Mathematics with Technology in Public and Private School Students

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.632811
Keywords: educational technologies, didactic intentionality, attitudes, mathematics

Supporting Agencies

  • Universidad del Atlántico (Colombia)

Abstract

Educational technology contributes to the improvement of the quality of education, playing a crucial role in the teaching of abstract content such as Mathematics. This study sought to determine how the use of technology by teachers influences the perceived didactic intentionality of students and their attitudes towards learning mathematics with technology, considering whether these relationships vary according to the type of school (public or private). Using an explanatory design with latent classes, 1,326 Colombian schoolchildren (685 girls) were evaluated through a series of surveys. A Structural Equation Model was generated and showed good fit (CFI = 0.982, TLI = 0.966, RMSEA = 0.050), supporting the study hypotheses. Regression coefficients indicate that perceived didactic intentionality influences student attitudes in both educational contexts, but technological use has no relevant effect among public school students. The implications of the technological strategies employed by teachers to teach Mathematics and the intentionality perceived by their students are discussed, as well as the impact of contextual differences on the guarantee of an equitable educational service for students from diverse socioeconomic contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    107
  • PDF (Español (España))
    140
  • PDF
    140

References

Abella-Peña, L., y García-Martínez, A. (2022). Comunidad de desarrollo profesional de profesores en formación inicial para la incorporación didáctica de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones: una experiencia desde la investigación de diseño educativo. Papeles, 14(28), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v14n28.1305

Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27

Ato, M., López-García J. J., y Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511.

Ávila-Toscano, J. H., Rambal-Rivaldo, L. I., Fortich, D. J., y Vargas-Delgado, L. (2025). Attitudes toward learning mathematics with technology: Psychometric properties of the Mathematics and Technology Attitudes Scale. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 13(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4257

Bray, A., y Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research: A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

Brown, R. (2018). Using laptop technology to improve mathematical achievement rates: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 37(3), 217–238. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/178474/

Cabero, J. y Barroso, J. (2016). ICT teacher training: a view of the TPACK model. Culture and Education, 28(3), 633–663 https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1203526

Campo-Quintero, A. X. (2020). La formación pedagógica TIC del docente, en tiempos de pandemia y su incidencia en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la matemática, en la educación básica. Eco Matemático, 11(2), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.22463/17948231.3063

Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., y Armour, K. M. (2016). Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1226792

Cheung, A. C. K. y Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001

Curwood, J. S. (2013). Applying the design framework to technology professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(3), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784710

Demir, C. G. y Önal, N. (2021). The effect of technology-assisted and project-based learning approaches on students’ attitudes towards mathematics and their academic achievement. Education and Information Technology, 26, 3375–3397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10398-8

Díaz, J. B., Molina-García, J., y Monfort-Pañego, M. (2020). El conocimiento y la intencionalidad didáctica en el uso de TIC del profesorado de educación física. Retos, 38, 497–504. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.74370

Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in Mathematics Education: Why it works (or doesn’t). En S. Cho, (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 135–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8

Drijvers, P. (2019). Head in the clouds, feet on the ground – A realistic view on using digital tools in mathematics education. En A. Büchter, M. Glade, R. Herold-Blasius, M. Klinger, F. Schacht y P. Scherer. (Eds.), Vielfältige Zugänge zum Mathematikunterricht (pp. 163–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24292-3_12

Eyyam, R. y Yaratan, H. S. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.s31

Grisales, A. M. A. (2018). Uso de recursos TIC en la enseñanza de las matemáticas: retos y perspectivas. Entramado, 14(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.4751

Higgins, K., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., y Crawford, L. (2019). Effects of technology in mathematics on achievement, motivation, and attitude: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 283–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117748416

Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Ibáñez, M. B., Uriarte, A. P., Zatarain, R. C., y Barrón, M. L. (2020). Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course. Computers & Education, 145, 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103734

JASP Team (2023). JASP version 0.18.1 [Computer software]. University of Amsterdam.

Jiménez-Tenorio, N., Aragón, L. N., y Oliva, J. M. M. (2016). Percepciones de estudiantes para maestros de educación primaria sobre los modelos analógicos como recurso didáctico. Enseñanza de las Ciencias Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 34(3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1943

Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., y Lee, J. (2010). Theory of Planned Behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.13.1.152

Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782488

Li, Q. y Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8

Mirete, A. B. R., García-Sánchez, F. A., y Hernández, F. P. (2015). Cuestionario para el estudio de la actitud, el conocimiento y el uso de TIC (ACUTIC) en Educación Superior. Estudio de fiabilidad y validez. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 83(29.2), 75–89. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/121034

Monroy, J. A. (2024). El uso de las nuevas tecnologías en la enseñanza de las matemáticas: una revisión sistemática. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, (28), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2024.18987

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Peña Gil, H. A., Cuartas Castro, K. A., y Tarazona Bermúdez, G. M. (2017). La brecha digital en Colombia: Un análisis de las políticas gubernamentales para su disminución. Redes de Ingeniería, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.14483/2248762X.12477

Pierce, R., Stacey, K., y Barkatsas, A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students' attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers & Education, 48(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.006

Poçan, S., Altay, B. y Yaşaroğlu, C. (2023). The Effects of Mobile Technology on Learning Performance and Motivation in Mathematics Education. Education and Information Technology, 28, 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6

Ran, H., Kim, N., y Secada, W. G. (2022). A meta‐analysis on the effects of technology’s functions and roles on students’ mathematics achievement in K‐12 classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Sadovsky, P., Quaranta, M. E., Itzcovich, H., Becerril, M. M., y García, P. (2015). La noción de relaciones entre cálculos y la producción de explicaciones en la clase de matemática como objetos de enseñanza. Su configuración en el marco de un trabajo colaborativo entre investigadores y docentes. Educación Matemática, 27(1), 7–36.

Saha, R. A., Mohd, A. F. A., y Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). The effects of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: Enlightening coordinate geometry learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.095

Sánchez, L., Reyes, A. M., Ortiz, D., y Olarte, F. (2017). El rol de la infraestructura tecnológica en relación con la brecha digital y la alfabetización digital en 100 instituciones educativas de Colombia. Calidad en la Educación, (47), 112–144. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-45652017000200112

Scott, J. J. y Goldring, J. E. (2017). Telling stories, landing planes and getting them moving: A holistic approach to developing students’ statistical literacy. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.219

Shabbir, M., Naeem, M., y Yasmin, A. (2020). Inequities of digital skills and innovation: An analysis of public and private schools in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 97–112

Shin, N., Sutherland, L. M., Norris, C. A., y Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01197.x

Souza, M. I. F., Torres, T. Z., y Amaral, S. F. D. (2010). Produção de conteúdos educativos baseada na aprendizagem significativa. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa (RELATEC), 9, 89–105. http://hdl.handle.net/10662/1262

Svenningsson, J., Höst, G., Hultén, M., y Hallström, J. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward technology: exploring the relationship among affective, cognitive and behavioral components of the attitude construct. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09657-7

Tan, C. Y. y Hew, K. F. (2017). Information technology, mathematics achievement and educational equity in developed economies. Educational Studies, 43(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1277137

Valdivieso, T., y Gonzáles, M. A. G. (2016). Competencia digital docente: ¿dónde estamos? Perfil del docente de educación primaria y secundaria. El caso de Ecuador. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 49, 57–73. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/45210

Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., y Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: a Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801

West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., y Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. En R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). The Guilford Press. https://cutt.ly/mwEQQuPb

Yurtseven, Z. A., O’Dwyer, L. M., y Lawson, J. (2019). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394

Published
07-01-2026
How to Cite
Ávila Toscano, J. H., Vargas Delgado, L., Sánchez Anillo, R. S., Rojas Sandoval, Y., & Hurtado Ibarra, E. (2026). Technological Use, Didactic Intentionality and Attitudes towards Learning Mathematics with Technology in Public and Private School Students. Revista De Investigación Educativa, (44). https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.632811
Issue
Section
Articles