Models and references that influence gender stereotypes in STEM
A case study in Spain
Supporting Agencies
- Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
Abstract
The science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) sector is an academic and professional field with high gender disparity figures despite being a field with a low unemployment rate. The “Questionnaire with University Students on STEM Studies in Higher Education” (QSTEMHE) was designed to determine the opinion of the Spanish university population on all branches of knowledge about gender stereotypes in STEM studies. This validated instrument was applied to a university sample of 2101 people from different Spanish universities. A quantitative methodology and the non-experimental ex-post-facto method were used, employing a simple random sampling technique. This study aims to analyse the relationship established between the models and references that university students have had and their manifestation of gender stereotypes on the ability to perform in STEM higher education studies. Among the main results, gender stereotypes about STEM degrees persist, considering them masculinised and male-oriented. Furthermore, the study confirms that models and references taken into account when choosing higher education studies impact the perception of men and women regarding stereotypes in STEM.
Downloads
References
Banchefsky, S., & Park, B. (2018). Negative Gender Ideologies and Gender-Science Stereotypes Are More Pervasive in Male-Dominated Academic Disciplines. Social Sciences, 7(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020027
Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119
Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: Trends and causes. Rockefeller Foundation.
Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
Blackburn, H. (2017). The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017. Science and Technology Libraries, 36(3), 235–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658
Blázquez, M., Castro, M., Tovar, E., Llamas, M., Plaza, I., & Meier, R. (2011). Are engineering students decreasing? A Spanish case study. 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773144
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Bourdieu, P. (1984). La représentation de la position sociale. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 52(1), 14–15. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1984.3521
Chan, R. C. H. (2022). A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self-efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): The influence of cultural and gender norms. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0
Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. American Association of University Women.
Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles: A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
Diekman, A. B., Weisgram, E. S., & Belanger, A. L. (2015). New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12010
Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M.-T. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415616201
Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
EDUCAbase. (2022). Estadística del Alumnado Enseñanzas Universitarias (Grado, 1o y 2o ciclo, Máster y Doctorado). Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional y Deportes. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas.html
Finzel, B., Deininger, H., & Schmid, U. (2018). From beliefs to intention: Mentoring as an approach to motivate female high school students to enrol in computer science studies. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT: 14-15 May 2018 (pp. 251-260). University Heilbronn. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196879
Gonsalves, A. J., Danielsson, A., & Pettersson, H. (2016). Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004
Gottfried, M., Owens, A., Williams, D., Kim, H. Y., & Musto, M. (2017). Friends and family: A literature review on how high school social groups influence advanced math and science coursetaking. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 62. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2857
Hall, W. M., Schmader, T., & Croft, E. (2015). Engineering Exchanges: Daily Social Identity Threat Predicts Burnout Among Female Engineers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615572637
Hernández Méndez, G. (2013). Habitus, estereotipos y roles de género. Percepciones de profesores y estudiantes. Revista Docencia Universitaria, 14(1), 89–105. https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistadocencia/article/view/4227
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Heybach, J., & Pickup, A. (2017). Whose STEM? Disrupting the Gender Crisis Within STEM. Educational Studies-Aesa, 53(6), 614–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369085
Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2019). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021
Kaye, L. K., Gresty, C. E., & Stubbs-Ennis, N. (2017). Exploring Stereotypical Perceptions of Female Players in Digital Gaming Contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(12), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0294
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing Whether She Belongs: Stereotypes Undermine Girls’ Interest and Sense of Belonging in Computer Science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Pomerantz, E. M., & Eaton, M. M. (2001). Maternal intrusive support in the academic context: Transactional socialization processes. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.174
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
Shapiro, J., & Williams, A. (2012). The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields. Sex Roles, 66, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0
Stoeger, H., Hopp, M., & Ziegler, A. (2017). Online Mentoring as an Extracurricular Measure to Encourage Talented Girls in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics): An Empirical Study of One-on-One Versus Group Mentoring. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217702215
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V., & Gokulsing, D. (2022). Gender gap in STEM education and career choices: What matters? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2019-0235
Thébaud, S., & Charles, M. (2018). Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM. Social Sciences, 7(7), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7070111
Verdugo-Castro, S., García-Holgado, A., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2022). The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(8), e10300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300
Verdugo-Castro, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Holgado, A. (2022a). Opiniones y percepciones sobre los estudios superiores STEM: Un estudio de caso exploratorio en España. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.27529
Verdugo-Castro, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Holgado, A. (2022b). University students’ views regarding gender in STEM studies: Design and validation of an instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12301–12336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11110-8
Verdugo-Castro, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., García-Holgado, A., & Bakieva, M. (2020). Pilot study on university students’ opinion about STEM studies at higher education. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020) (pp. 158–165). University of Salamanca.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
