Aprendizaje de las mujeres en las redes sociales: Validación de la escala MAIA con PLS
Supporting Agencies
- MINECO
Abstract
This paper presents an instrument to measure the learning that occurs in social networks sites. In the scientific literature there are few measures that allow knowing the learning processes in these digital environments. The design of the scale is based on the application of the Theory of Activity to social networks sites (Heo and Lee, 2013). The validation of the proposed scale is based on a descriptive survey-type study in which 1340 Spanish women participate, selected according to a stratified sampling by quotas, according to age. The data analysis combines exploratory and confirmatory techniques using SPSS (v. 24) and Smart PLS 3.0. The results show high indicators of reliability and validity of the scale. This assessment tool is especially useful to determine learning processes that occur in this type of digital environments, ultimately valuing their incorporation into various training strategies for the digital inclusion of women.
Downloads
References
Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or Lurking? Tracking the ‘Invisible’ Online Student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155. Recuperado de http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.505.5696&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Bowman, N. D. y Akcaoglu, M. (2014). “I see smart people!”: Using Facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 1–8. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.003
Carmines, E. G., y Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cobo, C. y Moravec, J. W. (2011). Aprendizaje Invisible. Hacia una nueva ecología de la educación. Barcelona: Publicacions I Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares approach for structural equation modeling. En G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crovi, D. (2013). Repensar la apropiación desde la cultura digital. En Susana Morales y María Inés Loyola (comp.), Nuevas perspectivas en los estudios de comunicación. La apropiación tecno-mediática (pp. 11-24). Buenos Aires: Imago Mundi.
Dabbagh, N. y Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A nautical formula for connectic formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3-8). Recuperado de http://digtechitalia.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/88358207/Dabbagh%202012.pdf
Daskalakis, S. y Mantas, J. (2008). Evaluating the impact of a service-oriented framework for healthcare interoperability. En S.K. Andersen et al. (Eds.), eHealth Beyond the Horizon – Get IT There Committee of MIE 2008 (pp. 285-290). Ámsterdam: IOS Press.
Eger, L. (2015). Is Facebook a similar learning tool for university students as LMS? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 233-238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.287
Fenwick, T. y Tennant, M. (2004). Understanding adult learners. En G. Foley (Ed.), Dimensions of adult Learning: Adult education and training in a global era adult education and training (pp. 55-73). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Falk, R.F. y Miller, N.B. (1992). A Primer for Soft Modeling. Akron: University of Akron Press.
Fornell, C., y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Greenhow, C. y Li, J. (2013). Like, comment, share: Collaboration and civic engagement within social network sites for inclusion. En C. Mouza, y N. Lavigne, (Eds.). Emerging technologies for the classroom: A learning sciences perspective (pp. 127-141). New York: Springer.
Greenhow, C. y Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923580
Greenhow, C., Dexter, S., y Riedel, E. (2006). Methods for Evaluating Online, Resourcebased Learning Environments for Teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 21–28. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876915.pdf
Greenhow, C., Menzer, M., y Gibbins, T. (2015). Re-thinking scientific literacy: Arguing science issues in a niche Facebook application. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 593-604. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.031
Helsper, E.J., y van Deursen, A.J.A.M. (2015). Digital skills in Europe: Research and policy. En K. Andreasson (Ed.), Digital Divides: The New Challenges and Opportunities of e-Inclusion (pp. 125-148). Public Administration and Public Policy, CRC Press.
Heo, G. M., y Lee, R. (2013). Blogs and Social Network Sites as Activity Systems: Exploring Adult Informal Learning Process through Activity Theory Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 133–145. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.4.133
Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (2009). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in the analysis of covariance structure: Conventional versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162-171. Recuperado de https://www.learntechlib.org/p/50678/
Kirschner, A. P. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 621-625 doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.011
Manca, S. y Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007
Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E. y Simonds, C.J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710
McDonald, S., McGarry, K., y Willis, L. M. (2013). Thinking-aloud about web navigation the relationship between think-aloud instructions, task difficulty and performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 2037–2041. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571455
Morales, J. M. R., Antino, M., De Marco, S., y Lobera, J. A. (2016). La nueva frontera de la desigualdad digital: la brecha participativa. The Participatory Divide. Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 166, 97-116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.156.97
Munzel, A., y H. Kunz, W. (2014). Creators, multipliers, and lurkers: who contributes and who benefits at online review sites. Journal of Service Management, 25(1), 49–74. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2013-0115
Park, Y., Heo, G.M. y Lee, R. (2011). Blogging for adult informal learning: Analyzing perceptions of koreans bloggers using perspectives of learning process. Journal of educational technology & Society, 14(2), 149-160. Recuperado de https://dx.doi.org/pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5ded/7b9bb9acffc28e66103d42cdfc5065445c0d.pdf
Pempek, T.A., Yermolayeva, Y.A. y Calvert, S.L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
Tabachnick, B.G. y Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
Tsovaltzi, D. Judele, R., Puhl, T. y Weinberger, A. (2015). Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to social networking sites? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 577-592. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.067
Vega, L.; Vico-Bosch, A., y Rebollo-Catalán, Á. (2015). Motivaciones de uso de las redes sociales para el desarrollo del capital social de las mujeres de entorno rural. Icono14, 13(2), 142-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v13i2.839
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, H.L,Woo, C.L., Quek, Y., Yang, Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: an exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., y Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.
Williams, B, Onsman, A., y Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care (JEPHC), 8(3), Article 990399. Recuperado de http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol8/iss3/1
Zurita, G. y Nussbaum, M., (2007). A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, (38)2, 211-235. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00580.x
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
