EXPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS FOR CREATIVE PERFORMANCE ACCORDING TO TWO CREATIVITY TESTS, TAKING INTELLIGENCE INTO ACCOUNT

Authors

  • María Luisa Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga
  • María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano
Keywords: explicit creative instructions, noncreative general instructions, creativity, intelligence, assessment

Abstract

The main purposes of the present study was to compare the impact of explicit creative instructions and noncreative general instructions on the performance in the Verbal Expression Test, Form A of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) and the “Test de Inteligencia Creativa” (CREA; in Spanish, the Creative Intelligence Test), as well as to determine whether the intelligence level—measured with the Domino Test, D-48—conditions creative activity and whether there is any interac-tion between the type of instructions and the intelligence level. The study was carried out with a sample of 341 high school students, of both sexes, and aged between 17 and 18 years. The results revealed that the explicit instructions for the creative performance of the tests activated responses in the experimental group that were significantly different from the responses of the control group to the same tests, following general instruc-tions, and this difference was more evident in high-intelligence subjects. Interesting conclusions for research, assessment, and education are reached.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Luisa Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga

Universidad Pública de Navarra

María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano

Universidad Pública de Navarra
How to Cite
Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L., & Sanz de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. (2008). EXPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS FOR CREATIVE PERFORMANCE ACCORDING TO TWO CREATIVITY TESTS, TAKING INTELLIGENCE INTO ACCOUNT. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 24(1), 129–137. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/32711
Issue
Section
Psychology of creativity

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
5987
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)