Five-factor model of personality disorders: Spanish normative data and validation

  • Joaquín Colodro Universidad de Murcia
  • Juan J. López-García Universidad de Murcia
  • Laura Mezquita Universitat Jaume I Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid
  • Lucía Colodro-Conde QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Universidad de Murcia
  • Manuel I. Ibáñez Universitat Jaume I Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid
  • Silvia Edo Universitat Jaume I Hospital de Día, Hospital Provincial de Castelló
  • Elena Villa Universitat Jaume I
  • Generós Ortet Universitat Jaume I Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid
Keywords: FFM, personality disorder, NEO PI-R, Spanish normative data, construct validity

Abstract

The categorical approach of personality disorders (PD) has given way to a dimensional paradigm. Within this, the Five-factor model (FFM) proposes theoretical hypotheses describing personality pathologies and PD empirical prototypes based on the DSM (DSM-PD). Moreover, a methodology to score DSM-PD using the NEO PI-R facets was developed. In this ex post-facto study FFM-PD count norms were developed using data from the NEO PI-R Spanish adaptation. Furthermore, the diagnostic agreement with the IPDE and validity of FFM-PD counts was analyzed in a clinical (n = 222) and non-clinical sample (n = 742). Based on NEO PI-R scores, we presented Spanish FFM-PD normative data. FFM-PD benchmarks were highly likely to be exceeded if subjects were classified as a subclinical case in the DSM-PD. Convergent correlations of FFM-PD counts with their equivalent subclinical cases of DSM-PD were statistically significant and outperformed any divergent correlation as well as the average divergent correlations in all FFM-PD. The use of a count technique based on NEO PI-R facets and Spanish FFM-PD normative data facilitate PD understanding and interpretation in various applied psychology fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.

Bagby, R. M., Costa, P. T., Widiger, T. A., Ryder, A. G., & Marshall, M. (2005). DSM‐IV personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: A multi-method examination of domain-and facet-level predictions. European Journal of Personality, 19(4), 307-324. doi:10.1002/per.563

Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., & De Fruyt, F. (2013). Comparing five sets of five-factor model personality disorder counts in a heterogeneous sample of psychiatric patients. European Journal of Personality, 27(4), 377-388. doi:10.1002/per.1859

Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual [Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor inventory (NEO FFI). Manual]. (3rd ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Published
10-04-2018
How to Cite
Colodro, J., López-García, J. J., Mezquita, L., Colodro-Conde, L., Ibáñez, M. I., Edo, S., Villa, E., & Ortet, G. (2018). Five-factor model of personality disorders: Spanish normative data and validation. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 34(2), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.2.289271
Section
Clinical and Health Psychology

Most read articles by the same author(s)