¿Cómo la evaluación primaria y secundaria de los eventos estresantes cotidianos influyen en el afecto negativo y positivo?

Autores/as

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.500581
Palabras clave: Afecto negativo, Afecto positivo , Evaluación primaria, Evaluación Secundaria, Afrontamiento, Estrés cotidiano

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia de la evaluación primaria, secundaria y de las estrategias de afrontamiento sobre el estrés diario, teniendo en cuenta cualquier posible efecto de los cinco grandes rasgos de personalidad. Durante 10 días, una cohorte de 122 personas llenó un diario en línea en el que registraron el evento estresante más importante de cada día, su evaluación primaria y secundaria y cómo lo afrontaron. Los resultados indican que el afecto negativo está influido por una evaluación primaria alta, una evaluación secundaria limitada y una alta tasa de rechazo, sin influencia significativa de los rasgos de personalidad. El afecto positivo está influido principalmente por un menor grado de valoración primaria, una evaluación secundaria alta, por una baja tasa de rechazo y de búsqueda de apoyo social. Además, un nivel bajo de neuroticismo fue el mejor predictor del afecto positivo. Se discuten estos datos, destacando la importancia de una evaluación situacional de episodios estresantes en cada momento para no sólo comprender los efectos del estrés en la salud sino también, para desarrollar intervenciones efectivas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102091006

Almeida, D. M. (2013). Resilience and vunerability to daily stressrs assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy. The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030

Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 808-818.

Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the Problems of Everyday Life: The role of Neuroticism in Exposure and Reactivity to Daily Stressors. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 355–386.

Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 890-902.

Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and Coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.

Cohen, S, Kamarck, T. W., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

Edo, S., Rovira, T., Maturano, N., & Fernández-Castro, J. (2021). Cuestionario PASA (Primary Appraisal Secundary Appraisal) para la Evaluación del Estrés. Adaptación al español e instrucciones de uso [PASA Questionnaire (Primary Appraisal Secondary Appraisal) for Stress Assessment. Adaptation to Spanish and instructions for use]. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/237178

Edo, S., Torrents-Rodas, D., Rovira, T., & Fernandez-Castro, J. (2012). Impact when receiving a diagnosis: Additive and multiplicative effects between illness severity and perception of control. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311429727

Ferrer, I., Fernández-Castro, J., Edo, S., & Rovira, T. (2021). The influence of the primary and secondary appraisal, and of the big five personality traits, on the choice of coping strategies: A study based on daily stress. Studia Psychologica, 63(3)., 63(3).

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a Mediator of Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 466-475.

Gaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M., & Ehlert, U. (2005). Psychological determinats of the cortisol stress rfesponse: the role of anticipatory cognitive apparaisal. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 599–610.

Gartland, N., O’Connor, D. B., Lawton, R., & Bristow, M. (2014). Exploring day-to-day dynamics of daily stressor appraisals, physical symptoms and the cortisol awakening response. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 50, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.08.006

Gartland, N., O’Connor, D. B., Lawton, R., & Ferguson, E. (2014). Investigating the effects of conscientiousness on daily stress, affect and physical symptom processes: A daily diary study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12077

Gomà-i-Freixanet, M., Martínez Ortega, Y., & Arnau, A. (2021). The location of coping strategies within the Alternative Five Factor Model of personality. New Ideas in Psychology, 60(August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100834

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attmpt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

Hobfoll, S. E., Dunahoo, C. L., Ben-Porath, Y., & Monnier, J. (1994). Gender and coping: The Dual-Axis Model of Coping. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(1), 49–82.

Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York, NY.

IBM. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. IBM Corp.

Kanner, A., Coyne, J., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1–39.

Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The “Trier social stress test” - A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1-2), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.

López-Gómez, I., Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2015). Adaptación de la “escala de afecto positivo y negativo” (panas) en una muestra general Española [Adaptation of the “positive and negative affect scale” (panas) in a general Spanish sample]. Psicologia Conductual, 23(3), 529–548.

Park, C. L., Armeli, S., & Tennen, H. (2004). Appraisal-coping goodness of fit: a daily internet study. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262855

Puigbó, J., Edo, S., Rovira, T., Limonero, J. T., & Fernández-Castro, J. (2019). Influence of the perceived emotional intelligence on the coping of the daily stress. Ansiedad y Estres, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2019.01.003

Remor, E. (2006). Psychometric Properties of a European Spanish Version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 86–93. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db= psyh&AN=2006-05496-010&lang=es&site=ehost-live

Rovira, T., Ferrer, I., Edo, S., Fernández-Castro, J., Benavides, G., Doval, E., & Martínez, F. (2016). Validity and feasibility of a nurses’ coping questionnaire for its use in Ecological Momentary Assessment. European Health Psychologist, 18(supp.), 758.

Schneider, T. R. (2008). Evaluations of stressful transactions: What’s in an appraisal? Stress and Health, 24(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1176

Segerstrom, S. C., & O’Connor, D. B. (2012). Stress, health and illness: Four challenges for the future. Psychology & Health, 27(2), 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.659516

Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological bulletin, 129(2), 216. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216

Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3/4), 233–269.

Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2007). Coping, Resources, Coping Processes, and Mental Health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology., 3(6), 377–401.

Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (2002). The challenge of capturing daily processes at the interface of social and clinical psychology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21(6), 610–627.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Wirtz, P. H., Ehlert, U., Emini, L., Rüdisüli, K., Groessbauer, S., Gaab, J., Elsenbruch, S., & Von Känel, R. (2006). Anticipatory cognitive stress appraisal and the acute procoagulant stress response in men. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(6), 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000245866.03456.aa

Publicado
27-08-2022
Cómo citar
Fernández Castro, J., Ferrer, I., Edo, S., & Rovira, T. (2022). ¿Cómo la evaluación primaria y secundaria de los eventos estresantes cotidianos influyen en el afecto negativo y positivo?. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 38(3), 538–545. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.500581
Número
Sección
Psicología de las emociones

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a