Generativity and quality of life in rural educators: a scoping review of the evidence in comparison with work and altruistic contexts
Abstract
Background: Generativity—the concern for guiding future generations and contributing to societal well-being—serves as an indicator of quality of life in various social contexts. This is especially pertinent among rural educators who may face limited organizational resources but benefit from community support. Method: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review utilized databases like Scopus and Science Direct to explore the impact of generativity on rural educators' objective and subjective quality of life, comparing findings with other work and altruistic contexts. Nineteen studies published in English between 2013 and 2023 were included. Results: In both work and altruistic settings, generativity positively correlates with life satisfaction, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being. Specifically, in rural educational environments where teachers face unique challenges yet develop strong community bonds and high subjective well-being, generativity is linked to personal satisfaction, resilience, community engagement, and cultural practices. Conclusions: The review underscores the importance of generativity in enhancing quality of life across societal activities, particularly among rural educators who influence educational outcomes and bolster community resilience. These findings suggest that fostering generativity through targeted professional development and community engagement programs could improve educators' well-being and effectiveness, especially in resource-limited rural settings.
Downloads
-
Abstract445
-
pdf179
References
Adamkovič, M., & Martončik, M. (2017). A review of consequences of poverty on economic decision-making: A hypothesized model of a cognitive mechanism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01784
Anand, P., & Lea, S. (2011). The psychology and behavioural economics of poverty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.004
Andre, L., van Vianen, A. E. M., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Oort, F. J. (2018). Motivational power of future time perspective: Meta-analyses in education, work, and healh. PloS ONE, 13(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190492
*Aparisi, D., Granados, L., Sanmartín, R., Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C., & García-Fernández, J. M. (2020). Relationship between emotional intelligence, generativity, and self-efficacy in secondary school teachers. Sustainability, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103950
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611
Böckler, A., Tusche, A., Schmidt, P. & Singer, T. (2018). Distinct mental trainings differentially affect altruistically motivated, norm motivated, and self-reported prosocial behaviour. Scientific Reports, 8, 13560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31813-8
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230
*Chen, J., Krahn, H. J., Galambos, N. L., & Johnson, M. D. (2019). Wanting to be remembered: Intrinsically rewarding work and generativity in early mid-life. Canadian Review of Sociology / Revue canadienne de sociologie, 56(1), 30–48. (1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12228
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 201–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6
Den Dekker, W. (2016). Global mindset and cross-cultural behavior: Improving leadership effectiveness. Palgrave Macmillan.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. Norton & Company.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
*Henry, H., Zacher, H., & Desmette, D. (2015). Reducing age bias and turnover intentions by enhancing intergenerational contact quality in the workplace: The role of opportunities for generativity and development. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wav005
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Prentice Hall.
*James Garcia, P. R. J. M., Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., & Caines, V. (2017). Sleeping with a broken promise: The moderating role of generativity concerns in the relationship between psychological contract breach and insomnia among older workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2222
*Kim, H. K., Park, C. H., & Lee, N. Y. (2020). Effects of Health Perception, Generativity and Wisdom on Job Competency of Korean Care Workers. Medico-Legal Update, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v20i2.1199
*Kooij, D. T. A. M., de Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2013). Beyond chronological age. Examining perceived future time and subjective health as age-related mediators in relation to work-related motivations and well-being. Work and Stress, 27(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.769328
*Krahn, H. J., Johnson, M. D., & Galambos, N. L. (2021). Intrinsically rewarding work and generativity in midlife: The long arm of the job. Work and Occupations, 48(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888420964942
*Krumm, S., Grube, A., & Hertel, G. (2013). No time for compromises: Age as a moderator of the relation between needs-supply fit and job satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.676248
*Lan, X., Liang, Y., Wu, G., & Ye, H. (2021). Relationships Among Job Burnout, Generativity Concern, and Subjective Well-Being: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613767
Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Munn, Z., Rittenmeyer, L., Salmond, S., Bjerrum, M., Loveday, H., Carrier, J., & Stannard, D. (2020). Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-03
Thomas, L. D. W., & Tee, R. (2022). Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12277
*Mahoney, N., Wilson, N. J., Buchanan, A., Milbourn, B., Hoey, C., & Cordier, R. (2020). Older male mentors: Outcomes and perspectives of an intergenerational mentoring program for young adult males with intellectual disability. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 31(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.250
*Mansour, S., & Tremblay, D. G. (2018). Blended work and opportunities for knowledge sharing: human resource management practices to increase innovative work behaviour and life satisfaction of bridge workers. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 9(4).
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
*Millová, K., & Blatný, M. (2018). Objective and subjective work characteristics and their relation to the successful development of adults in a society after a macrosocial transition. Studia Paedagogica, 23(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2018-2-5
Morse, S. (2023). Quality of life, well-being and the Human Development Index: A media narrative for the developed world? Social Indicators Research, 170, 1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03230-6
McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003
McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221
McGregor, J. A., & Pouw, N. (2017). Towards an economics of well-being. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1123-1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew044
OECD. (2011). How's life?: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Britten, N. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (Version 1). ESRC Methods Programme. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
*Pundt, L. M., Wöhrmann, A. M., Deller, J., & Shultz, K. S. (2015). Differential predictors of post-retirement life and work satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-08-2012-0250
Romero, M. A., & Laborín, J. F. (2016). Calidad de vida en docentes de educación pública superior. Revista Educación y Humanismo, 18(31), 205–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.18.31.1375
*Sánchez Henao, S., Huanquilén Ancan, E., Sandoval-Obando, E., & Carter-Thuillier, B. (2023). Generativity and rural teacher identity in a Mapuche community of Toltén (Chile): An exploratory study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(13). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i13.6319
*Sandoval Obando, E. E., Pareja-Arellano, N., Hernández-Mosqueira, C., & Riquelme-Brevis, H. (2023). What do we know about rural teaching identity? An exploratory study based on the generative-narrative approach. Journal of Pedagogy, 14(2), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2023-0013
*Sandoval Obando, E., Pareja Arellano, N., Acevedo-Duque, Á., Riquelme-Brevis, H., Hernández-Mosqueira, C., & Rivas-Valenzuela, J. (2022). Understanding the relational dynamics of Chilean rural teachers: Contributions from a narrative-generative perspective. Sustainability, 14(8386). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148386
*Shilo Levin, S., Shrira, A., & Hoffman, Y. (2021). Feeling older can be advantageous: A study on generativity, meaning in work and life satisfaction in Israeli workplaces. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(7), 2873–2887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00344-3
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
*Tullo, E. S., Wakeling, L. A., & Elliott, A. (2019). Impacts on older people contributing to an intergenerational course about aging. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 17(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2018.1535354
Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 1(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010072010360
*Yamashita, T., López, E. B., Soligo, M., & Keene, J. R. (2017). Older lifelong learners’ motivations for participating in formal volunteer activities in urban communities. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616688957
Copyright (c) 2025 The authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
About Copyright and Licensing, more details here.
