Pensamiento Computacional para la resolución de problemas complejos: ODS 7 Energía asequible y no contaminante

Acosta, Y., Alsina, Á., & Pincheira, N. (2023). Computational thinking and repetition patterns in early childhood education: Longitudinal analysis of representation and justification. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12051-6

Adediran, O. S., Benibo, I., & Akinpelumi, D. (2021). Biomass energy consumption and economic growth: An assessment of the relevance of sustainable development goal – 7 in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(6), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10565

Alfaro-Ponce, B., Alfaro-Ponce, M., Muñoz-Ibáñez, C. A., Durán-González, R. E., Sanabria-Zepeda, J. C., & González-Gómez, Z. L. (2023). Education in Mexico and technological public policy for developing complex thinking in the digital era: A model for technology management. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 8(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100439

Alibraheim, E. A., Hassan, H. F., & Soliman, M. W. (2023). Efficacy of educational platforms in developing the skills of employing augmented reality in teaching mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13669

Althubaiti, A., & Althubaiti, S. M. (2024). Flipping the Online Classroom to Teach Statistical Data Analysis Software: A Quasi-Experimental Study. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241235022

Amelink, C. T., Grote, D. M., Norris, M. B., & Grohs, J. R. (2024). Transdisciplinary Learning Opportunities: Exploring Differences in Complex Thinking Skill Development Between STEM and Non-STEM Majors. Innovative Higher Education, 49(1), 153-176. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09682-5

Ángel, C., Segredo, E., Arnay, R. & León, C. (2020). Simulador de Robótica Educativa para la promoción del Pensamiento Computacional. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 20(63). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.410191

Angeli, C. (2022). The effects of scaffolded programming scripts on pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: Developing algorithmic thinking through programming robots. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100329

Asunda, P., Faezipour, M., Tolemy, J., & Do Engel, M. T. (2023). Embracing Computational Thinking as an Impetus for Artificial Intelligence in Integrated STEM Disciplines through Engineering and Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 34(2), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.3

Baena-Rojas, J. J., Suárez-Brito, P., & López-Caudana, E. (2023). Reflections about Complex Thought and Complex Thinking: Why These Theoretical Constructs Maters on Higher Education? European Journal of Contemporary Education, 12(1), 4-18. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2023.1.4

Butko, L., Vasylenko, D., Fedorenko, S., Dobryden, O., & Martynyshyn, Y. (2022). Summarizing the Experience of Using Educational Online Platforms in Ukrainian Universities. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System, MEES 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES58014.2022.10005751

Çakiroğlu, Ü., & Çevik, İ. (2022). A framework for measuring abstraction as a sub-skill of computational thinking in block-based programming environments. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9455-9484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11019-2

Carlos-Arroyo, M., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Cruz-Sandoval, M., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2023). Development of complex thinking in a professional training process: An approach to business students of a Mexican University. Journal of Education for Business, 98(8), 483-491. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2233044

Chapman, A., Fujii, H., and Managi, S. (2019). Multinational Life Satisfaction, Perceived Inequality and Energy Affordability. Nature Sustainability. 2 (6), 508–514. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0303-5

Che, X., Jiang, M., & Fan, C. (2021). Multidimensional Assessment and Alleviation of Global Energy Poverty Aligned With UN SDG 7. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.777244

Chuliá-Jordán, R., Peña, A. V., & Llinares, M. C. (2022). The Press as a Resource for Promoting Sustainability Competencies in Teacher Training: The Case of SDG 7. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020857

Cruz-Sandoval, M., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Carlos-Arroyo, M., & Amézquita-Zamora, J. A. (2024). Student Perception of the Level of Development of Complex Thinking: An Approach Involving University Women in Mexico. Journal of Latinos and Education, 23(2), 768-780. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2023.2180370

Dmytrów, K., Bieszk-Stolorz, B., & Landmesser-Rusek, J. (2022). Sustainable Energy in European Countries: Analysis of Sustainable Development Goal 7 Using the Dynamic Time Warping Method. Energies, 15(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207756

Dobbins, A., Fuso Nerini, F., Deane, P., and Pye, S. (2019). Strengthening the EU Response to Energy Poverty. Nat. Energ. 4 (1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018- 0316-8

Dowd, J. E., Thompson, R. J., Schiff, L. A., & Reynolds, J. A. (2018). Understanding the complex relationship between critical thinking and science reasoning among undergraduate thesis writers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0052

Echeverria, L., Cobos, R., & Morales, M. (2019). Improving the Students Computational Thinking Skills with Collaborative Learning Techniques. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 14(4), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2019.2952299

Ferrante, P. (2023). Educational platforms: Uses and challenges in the post-digital school. A study in secondary schools of the City of Buenos Aires. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7921

Fields, D., Lui, D., Kafai, Y., Jayathirtha, G., Walker, J., & Shaw, M. (2021). Communicating about computational thinking: Understanding affordances of portfolios for assessing high school students’ computational thinking and participation practices. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 224-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1866933

Firoiu, D., Ionescu, G. H., Pîrvu, R., Cismaș, L. M., Tudor, S., & Patrichi, I. C. (2021). Dynamics of implementation of SDG 7 targets in eu member states 5 years after the adoption of the Paris agreement. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158284

Galanti, T. M., & Holincheck, N. M. (2024). Integrating computational thinking in elementary STEM using the engineering design process. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12638

Gautam, A., Bortz, W., & Tatar, D. (2020). Abstraction through multiple representations in an integrated computational thinking environment. 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366892

George-Reyes, C. E., Peláez Sánchez, I. C., Glasserman-Morales, L. D., & López-Caudana, E. O. (2023c). The Metaverse and complex thinking: Opportunities, experiences, and future lines of research. Frontiers in Education, 8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166999

George-Reyes, C. E., Contreras, Y., Ruiz-Ramírez, J. & López-Caudana, E. (2023a). Aprendizaje de los componentes del pensamiento computacional mediado por una aplicación virtual de la educación 4.0 en el entorno del pensamiento complejo. Educar, 59(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1645

George-Reyes, C. E., López-Caudana, E.O., Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. y RuizRamírez, J. (2023b). Pensamiento computacional basado en realidad virtual y razonamiento complejo: caso de estudio secuencial. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(73). http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.540841

George-Reyes, C.E. (2022). Imbricación del pensamiento computacional y la alfabetización digital en la enseñanza. Modelación a partir de una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 46(1), e345. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2023.1.1922

Grover, S. & Pea, R. (2017). Computational Thinking: A competency whose time has come. In Sentence, S., Barendsen, E. Schulte, C. Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/0.5040/9781350057142.ch-003

He, J., Yang, Y., Liao, Z., Xu, A., & Fang, K. (2022). Linking SDG 7 to assess the renewable energy footprint of nations by 2030. Applied Energy, 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119167

Holguin-Alvarez, J., Apaza-Quispe, J., Cruz-Montero, J., Ruiz-Salazar, J. M., & Acha, D. M. H. (2022). Mixed gamification with video games and educational platforms: A study on mathematical cognitive demand. Digital Education Review, 42, 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.42.136-153

Humán, E. M., Álvarez, D. J. R., & Muñoz, C. W. A. (2022). Critical and complex thinking and meaningful learning in Latin American education: A narrative review. Sociologia y Tecnociencia, 12(2), 144-164. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.2.2022.144-164

Ibarra-Vazquez, G., Ramí¬rez-Montoya, M. S., & Terashima, H. (2024). Gender prediction based on University students’ complex thinking competency: An analysis from machine learning approaches. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2721-2739. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11831-4

Khwankaew, A. (2023). The Conceptual Framework for Designing an Appropriate Learning Approach to Improve Students’ Achievement for Educational Opportunity Expansion Schools Using Digital Learning Platform. 8th International STEM Education Conference, iSTEM-Ed 2023 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed59413.2023.10305751

Kuleshova, V. V., Kutsak, L. V., Liulchak, S. Y., Tsoi, T. V., & Ivanenko, I. V. (2020). Implementation of modern distance learning platforms in the educational process of HEI and their effectiveness. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(7), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n7p217

Lafuente Martínez, M., Lévêque, O., Benítez, I., Hardebolle, C., & Zufferey, J. D. (2022). Assessing Computational Thinking: Development and Validation of the Algorithmic Thinking Test for Adults. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211057819

Lee, I., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational Thinking Integration Patterns Along the Framework Defining Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09802-x

Li, J., & Wang, R. (2023). Machine Learning Adoption in Educational Institutions: Role of Internet of Things and Digital Educational Platforms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054000

Lugo-Armenta, J. & Pino-Fan, L. (2022). Inferential reasoning of high school mathematics teachers about t-Student statistic. Uniciencia, 36(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.36-1.25

Luh, W. M. (2024). A General Framework for Planning the Number of Items/Subjects for Evaluating Cronbach’s Alpha: Integration of Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals. Methodology, 20(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.10449

Manterola, C., & Otzen, T. (2015). Estudios Experimentales 2 Parte. Estudios Cuasi-Experimentales. International Journal of Morphology, 33(1), 382-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000100060

Mensah, J. K. (2022). Electricity and informal settlements: Towards achieving SDG 7 in developing countries. Energy Research and Social Science, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102844

Merino-Soto, C. (2023). Aiken’s V Coefficient: Differences in Content Validity Judgments. MHSalud: Revista en Ciencias del Movimiento Humano y Salud, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15359/mhs.20-1.3

Minga-Vallejo, RE., Ramírez-Montoya, MS. (2023). Social Construction of Learning: Analysis from the Participants of an Energy Sustainability xMOOC. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds) Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. TEEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_56

Novielli, J., Kane, L., & Ashbaugh, A. R. (2023). Convenience Sampling Methods in Psychology: A Comparison Between Crowdsourced and Student Samples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000394

Oberauer, K., Schickl, M., Zint, M., Liebhaber, N., Deisenrieder, V., Kubisch, S., Parth, S., Frick, M., Stötter, H., & Keller, L. (2023). The impact of teenagers’ emotions on their complexity thinking competence related to climate change and its consequences on their future: Looking at complex interconnections and implications in climate change education. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 907-931. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01222-y

Pailman, W., & de Groot, J. (2022). Rethinking education for SDG 7: A framework for embedding gender and critical skills in energy access masters programmes in Africa. Energy Research and Social Science, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102615

Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2022). Algorithmic Explanations: An Unplugged Instructional Approach to Integrate Science and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(4), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09965-0

Purwasih, R., & Dahlan, J. A. (2024). How do you solve number pattern problems through mathematical semiotics analysis and computational thinking? Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp403-430

Qian, Y., & Choi, I. (2023). Tracing the essence: Ways to develop abstraction in computational thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1055-1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10182-0

Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Sanabria-Z, J., & Miranda, J. (2022). Complex Thinking in the Framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation—A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010004

Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., Martínez-Pérez, S., Rodriguez-Abitia, G., & Lopez-Caudana, E. (2022). Digital accreditations in MOOC-based training on sustainability: Factors that influence terminal efficiency. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7082

Rates, C. A., Mulvey, B. K., Chiu, J. L., & Stenger, K. (2022). Examining ontological and self-monitoring scaffolding to improve complex systems thinking with a participatory simulation. Instructional Science, 50(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09573-2

Raza, S. A. (2021). Managing ethical requirements elicitation of complex socio-technical systems with critical systems thinking: A case of course-timetabling project. Technology in Society, 66. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101626

Rodriguez-Calderon, R., & Belmonte-Izquierdo, R. (2021). Educational Platform for the Development of Projects Using Internet of Things. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 16(3), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3122971

Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

Shi, J., & Cheung, A. (2024). The Impacts of a Social Emotional Learning Program on Elementary School Students in China: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00707-9

Tibber, M. S., Wang, M., & Zhang, C. (2023). The Role of Platform Brand in the Association Between Social Media Use, Stress and Educational Attainment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(8), 1594-1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2064035

Tripon, C. (2022). Supporting Future Teachers to Promote Computational Thinking Skills in Teaching STEM—A Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912663

Tsai, M.-J., Liang, J.-C., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2021). The Computational Thinking Scale for Computer Literacy Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 579-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120972356

UNESCO (2015). Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for action for implementation of SDG 4, UNESCO.

UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Learning Objectives, UNESCO.

Valdivia Vázquez, J. A., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., & González, J. R. V. (2021). Psychometric assessment of a tool to evaluate motivation and knowledge of an energy-related topic MOOC. Educational Media International, 58(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2021.1976827

Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Alcantar-Nieblas, C., Glasserman-Morales, L. D., & Nuñez-Rodríguez, X. (2024). Development of Social Entrepreneurship Competencies and Complex Thinking in an Intensive Course of Open Educational Innovation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(1), 1-20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.12187

Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. it represents a universally applicable attitude and skill set everyone, not just computer scientists, would be eager to learn and use. Commun. ACM, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/vlhcc.2011.6070404

Zhukova, G., & Mordous, I. (2021). Virtual Platform of Educational Institutionalism in the Context of Social Transformations. Studia Warminskie, 58, 219-235. https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.7066