Argumentative communication in the Knowledge Society, key to distributed leadership for educational change from professional development

Abstract

This article explores the power of creative and democratic feedback that employs the epistemic dimension of communication by teachers within the framework of the Knowledge Society. The educational benefit of semiosis is studied by which human intelligence makes arguments to construct hypothetical knowledge of action research and the assistance that artificial intelligence reports to its cognitive scaffolding with its computational technologies. This is consistent with the necessary consideration of teachers as apprentices of their own work through professional development projects in real contexts to promote social improvement from the empowerment of the educational community through a vision of distributed leadership. In this regard, in accordance with the recommendations of solidarity of UNESCO, we also study the illuminating theories of Peirce and Dewey on the hypothetical logic from which the inventions of thought emerge from meaningful testimony and open discursivity to the freedom of life. The communicative use of heuristic argumentation in authentic learning situations where shared research takes place reveals the dynamic and experimental condition of educational knowledge and, with community ethics, dialogically prevents the impostures of efficiencyist neobehaviorism.