Reframing Clinical Reasoning in Radiology through Dual Process Theory in Medical Education.

Authors

  • Paola Ceciliana Añazco Moreira Docente de la Carrera de Medicina, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo, Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7499-6141
  • Andy Hermógenes Luque Loor Docente de la Carrera de Medicina, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo, Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-3838
  • Ariel Melis Sosa Docente de la Carrera de Medicina, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo, Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0671-2723
  • José André Cedeño Orejuela Docente de la Carrera de Medicina, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo, Ecuador - Docente de Posgrado en Maestría en Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Iberoamericana del Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4754-0643
Keywords: Dual Process Theory, Clinical Reasoning, Radiology, Medical Education

Abstract

The growing demands of clinical reasoning in medical education highlight the need for cognitive frameworks that explain decision-making under uncertainty. Dual Process Theory (DPT), which distinguishes between intuitive (System 1) and analytical (System 2) reasoning, provides a valuable model for understanding diagnostic processes. However, its integration into medical training remains insufficiently structured, limiting its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce cognitive errors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    0
  • pdf (Español (España))
    0

References

1. Evans JS. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008, 59, 255-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

2. Evans JS, Stanovich KE. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013, 8(3), 223-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685

3. Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Beckstead J, et al. Dual processing model of medical decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12(94). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-94

4. Van Der Gijp A, Webb EM, Naeger DM. How Radiologists Think: Understanding Fast and Slow Thought Processing and How It Can Improve Our Teaching. Acad Radiol. 2017, 24(6), 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.012

5. Yoon SY, Lee KS, Bezuidenhout AF, Kruskal JB. Spectrum of Cognitive Biases in Diagnostic Radiology. Radiographics. 2024, 44(7), e230059. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230059

6. Itri JN, Patel SH. Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018, 210(5), 1097-1105. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18907

7. Leong JJ, Nicolaou M, Emery RJ, Darzi AW, Yang GZ. Visual search behaviour in skeletal radiographs: a cross-specialty study. Clin Radiol. 2007, 62(11), 1069-77. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.008

8. Brams S, Ziv G, Hooge ITC, Levin O, De Brouwere T, Verschakelen J, Dauwe S, Williams AM, Wagemans J, Helsen WF. Focal lung pathology detection in radiology: Is there an effect of experience on visual search behavior? Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020, 82(6), 2837-2850. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02033-y

9. Pecaric M, Boutis K, Beckstead J, Pusic M. A Big Data and Learning Analytics Approach to Process-Level Feedback in Cognitive Simulations. Acad Med. 2017, 92(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001234

10. Monteiro S, Sherbino J, LoGiudice A, Lee M, Norman G, Sibbald M. The influence of viewing time on visual diagnostic accuracy: Less is more. Med Educ. 2024, 58(7), 858-868. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15380

Published
12-06-2026
How to Cite
Añazco Moreira, P. C., Luque Loor, A. H., Melis Sosa, A., & Cedeño Orejuela, J. A. (2026). Reframing Clinical Reasoning in Radiology through Dual Process Theory in Medical Education. Spanish Journal of Medical Education, 7(4). Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/edumed/article/view/720731

Most read articles by the same author(s)