Psychopathic Profiles in the General Population:
Construction and validation of the ERPO Scale
Abstract
Subclinical psychopathy is an issue of interest for various psychological fields (human resources, forensic context, clinical psychology, etc.). The aim of this study was to construct a scale for the assessment of subclinical psychopathy and to use it to obtain psychopathic profiles in the general adult Spanish population. To achieve this, a set of items evaluating 3 dimensions (Manipulation, Insensitivity, Reckless Impulsivity) was generated and reviewed by a panel of experts in psychometrics and psychological assessment. The pilot study was completed by 436 subjects, and the main study by 536. The internal structure of the scale was explored using various Exploratory Factor Analyses and a final Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Cluster analysis resulted in 5 subject groupings (Psychopathic, Non-Psychopathic, Manipulative, Callous, and Reckless), which showed differential relationships with Psychopathy, Dark Triad, Agreeableness, Honesty-Humility, and Self-Interest. The developed scale provides valid and reliable scores for assessing subclinical psychopathy in the general adult Spanish population, as well as the possibility of establishing 5 psychopathic profiles in this population.
Downloads
-
Abstract1117
-
pdf81
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of men-tal disorders (5th ed). American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Andreu, J. M., Antón, A. A., & Peña, M. E. (2018). Análisis psicométrico de la escala de psicopatía de Levenson [Psychometric analysis of the Levenson Psychopathy Scale]. Psicopatología Clínica, Legal y Forense, 18, 134–151.
Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the ma-jor dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
Book, A., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016
Buskirk, T. D. (2015). Are sliders too slick for surveys? An experiment com-paring slider and radio button scales for smartphone, tablet and comput-er based surveys. Methods, Data, Analyses, 9(2), 229-260. https://doi.org/10.12758/MDA.2015.013
Cale, E. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and An-tisocial Personality Disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(8), 1179–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00125-8
Cleckley, H. M. (1988). The mask of sanity: An attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality. E.S. Cleckley.
Downing, S., & Haladyna, T. (2006). Handbook of test development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appro-priateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of per-sonality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
García-Fernández, J., Cuesta, M., Postigo, Á., Menéndez-Aller, Á., González-Nuevo, C., & García-Cueto, E. (2024). Ítems tipo Likert vs. Ítems conti-nuos: ¿Qué opción es mejor? [Likert-type Items vs. Continuous Items: Which Option Is Better?] Revista Internacional de Sociología, 82(2), e252. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2024.82.2.M23-04
García-Fernández, J., Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., González-Nuevo, C., Menén-dez-Aller, Á., & García-Cueto, E. (2022). To be direct or not: Reversing Likert response format items. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 25, e24. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2022.20
Gómez-Leal, R., Megías-Robles, A., Gutiérrez-Cobo, M. J., Cabello, R., Fer-nández-Abascal, E. G., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2021). Spanish adapta-tion and validation of the 34-Item Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP). Journal of Personality Disorders, 35(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_434
Gonzalez, O., MacKinnon, D. P., & Muniz, F. B. (2021). Extrinsic conver-gent validity evidence to prevent jingle and jangle fallacies. Multivariate Be-havioral Research, 56(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1707061
Hall, J. R., & Benning, S. D. (2006). The ‘successful’ psychopath: Adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 459–478). The Guild-ford Press.
Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8
Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychop-athy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.1.7
Hare, R. D., Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., Forth, A. E., Hart, S. D., & New-man, J. P. (1990). The revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and fac-tor structure. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy-chology, 2(3), 338–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.338
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2005). Structural models of psychopathy. Cur-rent Psychiatry Reports, 7(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-005-0026-3
Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 741–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.741
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise meas-ure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
Kranefeld, I., & Blickle, G. (2022). The good, the bad, and the ugly? A triar-chic perspective on psychopathy at work. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(15), 1498–1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211022667
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2009). Scale descriptions. The HEXACO Personality Inventory - Revised. http://hexaco.org/scaledescriptions
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2006). The self-report assessment of psy-chopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Hand-book of psychopathy (pp. 107–132). The Guildford Press.
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). Factor: A computer program to fit the Exploratory Factor Analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192753
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Robust Promin: A method for di-agonally weighted factor rotation. Liberabit, 25(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.08
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2021). MSA: The forgotten index for identifying inappropriate items before computing exploratory item factor analysis. Methodology, 17(4), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.7185
Mahmut, M. K., Menictas, C., Stevenson, R. J., & Homewood, J. (2011). Vali-dating the factor structure of the self-report psychopathy scale in a com-munity sample. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023090
Miller, J. D., Hyatt, C. S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Carter, N. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Psychopathy and machiavellianism: A distinction without a dif-ference? Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The Dark Core of personali-ty. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy). Perspec-tives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
Navarro-González, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2016). How re-sponse bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports. Psico-thema, 28(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.113
O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
Patrick, C. J., & Drislane, L. E. (2015). Triarchic Model of Psychopathy: Ori-gins, operationalizations, and observed linkages with personality and general psychopathology. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12119
Pemment, J. (2013). Psychopathy versus sociopathy: Why the distinction has become crucial. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.001
Pineda, D., Sandín, B. & Muris, P. (2020) Psychometrics properties of the spanish version of two Dark Triad scales: The Dirty Dozen and the Short Dark Triad. Current Psychology 39, 1873–1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9888-5
Porter, S. (1996). Without conscience or without active conscience? The etiol-ogy of psychopathy revisited. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-1789(95)00010-0
Postigo, Á., García-Fernández, J., Cuesta, M., Recio, P., Barría-González, J., & Lozano, L. M. (2024). Giving meaning to the Dark Triad: Comparison of different factor structures of the Dirty Dozen through eight regions of the world. Assessment, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231209282
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical compu-ting. https://www.R-project.org/
Revelle, W. (2021). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality re-search. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Roncero, M., Fornés, G., & Belloch, A. (2013). Hexaco: Una nueva aproxima-ción a la evaluación de la personalidad en Español. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, XXII(3).
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of Cluster Analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathe-matics, 20, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Schreiber, A., & Marcus, B. (2020). The place of the “Dark Triad” in general models of personality: Some meta-analytic clarification. Psychological Bulle-tin, 146(11), 1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000299
Seara-Cardoso, A., Queirós, A., Fernandes, E., Coutinho, J., & Neumann, C. (2020). Psychometric properties and construct validity of the short ver-sion of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in a southern european sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(4), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1617297
Spytska, L. (2024). Symptoms and main differences between a psychopath and a sociopath. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 212(1), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001728
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Verona, E., & Vitale, J. (2018). Psychopathy in women: Assessment, manifes-tations, and etiology. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 509–528). The Guilford Press.
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T., Miller, E., Bache, S., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D., Spi-nu, V., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139
Copyright (c) 2026 The authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
About Copyright and Licensing, more details here.


