Predictive value of self-efficacy with learning strategies in higher education in two face-to-face and distance modalities. A comparative analysis

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/red.635221
Keywords: Self-efficacy, distance education, face-to-face education, learning strategies

Abstract

The university context is an academic space where different factors converge. These elements will be conditioned by the itinerary established, depending on the type of studies undertaken, whether face-to-face or distance learning, which will determine the strategies established and self-efficacy in learning. In this research, 246 students from the National University of Distance Education (UNED) [Spain], with participants (n = 110) and the University of Jaén (Andalusia) [Spain], with participants (n = 136), took part in this research. The Academic Situations Specific Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (EAPESA) and the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Learning Strategies in University Students (CEVEAPEU) were used. The aim was to determine the predictive value of self-efficacy with learning strategies in face-to-face and distance university education. This research used a reflective structural equation model (PLS-SEM) according to the theoretical framework proposed, from an explanatory-predictive perspective. The results obtained showed the following coefficients of determination in the distance scenario [(R2=0.736); (Q²=0.281)]; and face-to-face scenario [(R2=0.725); (Q²=0.306)]. This research has corroborated the trend, approximation and convergence produced in recent years in these academic modalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    365
  • PDF (Español (España))
    457

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Autoeficacia: el ejercicio del control. WH Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). Guilford Press

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in human behavior, 111, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdate, NJ: LEA

Dai, Y., Luan, L., & Lin, X. (2023). The Effects of Online Learning Readiness on Self-Regulated Learning for the First-Time Online Learning Students . Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 42-62.

Demuner Flores, M. R. (2023). Estrategias de aprendizaje autorregulado y el rendimiento no académico en el contexto de la pandemia COVID-19. PUBLICACIONES, 53(3), 179–213. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v53i3.23773

Gargallo, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M., & Pérez-Perez, C. (2009). El cuestionario CEVEAPEU. Un instrumento para la evaluación de las estrategias de aprendizaje de los estudiantes universitarios. RELIEVE, 15(2), 1- 31.

García, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1993). Self-schemas, motivational stra-tegies and self-regulated learning. Comunicación presentada en el Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Atlanta, GA, April 12-16.

García-Fernández, J. M., Inglés, C. J., Vicent, M., Gonzálvez. C., Pérez Sánchez, A. M., & Lagos San Martín, N. (2016). Validación de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica de Situaciones Académicas en Chile y su relación con las estrategias de aprendizaje. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 41(1), 118-131.

Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors. Sustainability, 13, 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Halverson, L.R., & Graham, C.R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145-178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431.

Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002

Jácome-León, S., Puga-Places, P., & Briones-Jácome, S., (2023). Autoeficacia, motivación y metas personales en entornos virtuales deEducación Superior. Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(6), 550–561, https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.6.2101

Joglar, C., Quintanilla Gatica, M. R., Rodríguez Malabrán, M. E., & Soler Aqueveque, B. M. (2023). Autoeficacia y emociones del estudiantado de ciencias en la enseñanza básica durante la investigación en línea. Un estudio exploratorio en Chile. Edutec, Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (83), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2023.83.2729

Jun Hui Tan, F., Oka, P., Dambha Miller, H., & Chuan Tan, N. (2021). The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 22(44). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01391-2

Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116

Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727

Mathrani, A., Christian, S. & Ponder-Sutton, A. (2016). PlayIt: Game Based Learning Approach for Teaching Programming Concepts. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 5-17

Medina Medina, G. C. (2023). Estrategias metacognitivas que aplican estudiantes de educación superior en su proceso de aprendizaje. Educación Superior, 10(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.53287/dfyv7844ui42n

Moos, D.C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Monitoreo, planificación y autoeficacia durante el aprendizaje con hipermedia: el impacto de los andamiajes conceptuales. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1686–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.001

Muijs, D., & Bokhove, C. (2020). Metacognition and Self-Regulation: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation.

Ortega-Ruipérez, B. (2022). The Role of Metacognitive Strategies in Blended Learning: Study Habits and Reading Comprehension. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32056

Pacheco, D. I., García, J.-N., & Díez, C. (2009). Autoeficacia, en toque y papel de la práctica de los maestros en la enseñanza de la escritura [Self-efficacy, approach, and teacher's practice in the writing teaching]. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 2(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v2i1.17

Palenzuela, D. (1983). Construcción y validación de una escala de autoeficacia percibida específica de situaciones académicas. Análisis y Modificación de conducta, 9(21), 185–219.

Richter, N.F., Hauff, S., Ringle, C.M. et al. (2022). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Complementary Methods in International Management Research. Manag Int Rev 62, 449–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00475-0

Sadeghi, M. (2019). A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4, 80-88.

https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 45–68). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Schwam, D., Greenberg, D., & Li, H. (2020). Individual Differences in Self-regulated Learning of College Students Enrolled in Online College Courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/089236 47.2020.1829255

Sixto-García, J. & Duarte Melo, A. G. S. (2020). Self-destructive content in university teaching: new challenge in the Digital Competence of Educators. Communication & Society, 33(3), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.187-199

Tipismana, O. (2019). Factores de Resiliencia y Afrontamiento como Predictores del Rendimiento Académico de los Estudiantes en Universidades Privadas. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia Y Cambio En Educación, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.2.008

Triana V, S., & López V, O. (2023). Autoeficacia y logro académico en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje. Plumilla Educativa, 31 (1), 07-32. https://doi.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-6854.

Yavuzalp, N., & Bahcivan, E. (2020). The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into turkish and interpretation according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 21(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.674388

Zeng, H., & Luo, J. (2023). Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: a meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4297–4313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2197953

Zhang, Y., & Lin, C.‐H. (2020). Motivational profiles and their correlates among students in virtual school foreign language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12871

Zimmerman, W. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2016). Online Learning Self-Efficacy in Students With and Without Online Learning Experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801

Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2017). The role of self-efficacy and related beliefs in self-regulation of learning and performance. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed., pp. 313–333). The Guilford Press.

Published
31-07-2025
How to Cite
Gavín Chocano, Óscar, Luque de la Rosa, A., & García-Martínez, I. (2025). Predictive value of self-efficacy with learning strategies in higher education in two face-to-face and distance modalities. A comparative analysis. Distance Education Journal, 25(82). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.635221
Issue
Section
Section Invalid