Pensamiento creativo matemático -prueba basada en la etnomatemática: rol de la actitud hacia las matemáticas, estilo creativo, identidad étnica y nivel educativo de los padres
Resumen
El pensamiento creativo desempeña un papel crucial en el éxito académico en matemáticas, influenciado por diversos factores. Sin embargo, el impacto combinado de la educación de los padres, la identidad étnica, la actitud hacia las matemáticas y el estilo creativo en el pensamiento creativo matemático en el contexto de la etnomatemáticano ha sido examinado de manera exhaustiva. En este estudio transversal, exploramos estas relaciones entre 896 estudiantes de secundaria seleccionados al azar de cinco escuelas públicas y privadas que completaron una prueba basada en etnomatemática de pensamiento creativo matemático (MCT) y cuestionarios. Los participantes tenían una edad promedio de 13.34 + 1.08 años, y más de la mitad eran hombres (53.7%). Los resultados mostraron que una actitud positiva hacia las matemáticas se relacionaba con niveles más altos de fluidez, flexibilidad y originalidad en el pensamiento creativo, mientras que una sólida identidad étnica se asociaba con una mayor flexibilidad. Aunque el estilo creativo y la educación de los padres tenían una correlación negativa con la creatividad en general, esta relación se volvía positiva al examinarla en diferentes niveles de grado. Curiosamente, la actitud hacia las matemáticas actuaba como mediadora, influyendo en el impacto de la formación educativa de los padres en la creatividad de los estudiantes. Este estudio contribuye a nuestra comprensión de la naturaleza multifacetica del pensamiento creativo matemático, ofreciendo conocimientos para mejorar la educación matemática en la era digital al reconocer la importancia del apoyo parental, la identidad étnica y las actitudes para fomentar la creatividad.
Descargas
Citas
Al-Suleiman, N. (2009). Cross-cultural studies and creative thinking abilities. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational & Psychologic Sciences, 1(1), 1–41.
Basadur, M. I. N., Runco, M. A., & VEGAxy, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M. A. B., & Hayati, A. (2020). The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105227
Cabra, J. F., & Guerrero, C. D. (2022). Regional creativity: Cultural and socio-economic differences. Journal of Creativity, 32(2), 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100022
Castillo-Vergara, M., Galleguillos, N. B., Cuello, L. J., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005
Chen, M.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Lo, Y.-H. (2015). Creativity cognitive style, conflict, and career success for creative entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 906–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.050
Cheung, C.-K., Rudowicz, E., Yue, X., & Kwan, A. S. (2003). Creativity of university students: What is the impact of field and year of study? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00825.x
D’Ambrosio, U., & Rosa, M. (2017). Ethnomathematics and its pedagogical action in mathematics education. Ethnomathematics and Its Diverse Approaches for Mathematics Education, 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_12
Danovitch, J. H. (2019). Growing up with Google: How children’s understanding and use of internet‐based devices relates to cognitive development. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.142
Davadas, S. D., & Lay, Y. F. (2017). Factors affecting students’ attitude toward mathematics: A structural equation modeling approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80356
Davis-Kean, P. E., Tighe, L. A., & Waters, N. E. (2021). The role of parent educational attainment in parenting and children’s development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/096372142199
Ee, J., Seng, T. O., & Kwang, N. A. (2007). Styles of creativity: Adaptors and innovators in a Singapore context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026466
Gil-Hernández, C. J. (2019). Do well-off families compensate for low cognitive ability? Evidence on social inequality in early schooling from a twin study. Sociology of Education, 92(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719
Grodoski, C. (2016). Unpacking & packing visual culture: Creative thinking strategies. Art Education, 69(3), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1158588
Harris, L. R. (2015). Reviewing research on parent attitudes towards school assessment: Implications for classroom assessment practices. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois.
Hongjia, Z., Ling, W., & Min, Z. (2018). The relations among creative cognitive style, creative personality, and creative thinking. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 16(1), 51.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jay, T., Rose, J., & Simmons, B. (2018). Why is parental involvement in children’s mathematics learning hard? Parental perspectives on their role supporting children’s learning. Sage Open, 8(2), 2158244018775466. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401877546
Karwowski, M. (2016). Culture and psychometric studies of creativity. The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research, 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_8
Kim, H. J., Park, J. H., Yoo, S., & Kim, H. (2016). Fostering creativity in tablet-based interactive classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 207–220.
Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), 505–540. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1471
Kumar, V. K., Kemmler, D., & Holman, E. R. (1997). The Creativity Styles Questionnaire—Revised. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_6
Lehrl, S., Ebert, S., Blaurock, S., Rossbach, H.-G., & Weinert, S. (2020). Long-term and domain-specific relations between the early years home learning environment and students’ academic outcomes in secondary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1618346
Li, G. (2006). What Do Parents Think? Middle-Class Chinese Immigrant Parents’ Perspectives on Literacy Learning, Homework, and School-Home Communication. School Community Journal, 16(2), 27–46.
Liang, Q., Niu, W., Cheng, L., & Qin, K. (2022). Creativity Outside School: The Influence of Family Background, Perceived Parenting, and After‐school Activity on Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.521
Liu, R., Yu, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., & Luo, J. (2021). Creative factors and psychotherapeutic insight: Effects of novelty and appropriateness. Creativity Research Journal, 33(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1940032
Mann, E. L. (2009). The search for mathematical creativity: Identifying creative potential in middle school students. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903297402
McMullen, R., & de Abreu, G. (2011). Mothers’ experiences of their children’s school mathematics at home: The impact of being a mother-teacher. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.550727
Mkpanang, J. T. (2016). Influence of Creative Style and Gender on Students’ Achievement in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 42–46.
Mönkediek, B., & Diewald, M. (2022). Do academic ability and social background influence each other in shaping educational attainment? The case of the transition to secondary education in Germany. Social Science Research, 101, 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102625
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. Computer software manual
Nori, R., Signore, S., & Bonifacci, P. (2018). Creativity style and achievements: An investigation on the role of emotional competence, individual differences, and psychometric intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01826
Orey, D., & Rosa, M. (2007). Cultural assertions and challenges towards pedagogical action of an ethnomathematics program. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 10–16.
Paletz, S. B., & Peng, K. (2009). Problem finding and contradiction: Examining the relationship between naive dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410902858683
Pan, X., & Yu, H. (2018). Different effects of cognitive shifting and intelligence on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.144
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7(2), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489272003
Power, J. B. (2015). An investigation into the factors affecting student creativity in higher education in Thailand. Thammasat Review, 18(1), 177–198.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2021). The three ring conception of giftedness: A change in direction from being gifted to the development of gifted behaviors. Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent, 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_19
Retanal, F., Johnston, N. B., Di Lonardo Burr, S. M., Storozuk, A., DiStefano, M., & Maloney, E. A. (2021). Controlling-supportive homework help partially explains the relation between parents’ math anxiety and children’s math achievement. Education Sciences, 11(10), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100620
Rodet, C. S. (2021). The wellspring of creativity? Using divergent‐thinking tasks to understand creative characteristics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(6), 1435–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3318
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015). A trivium curriculum for mathematics based on literacy, matheracy, and technoracy: An ethnomathematics perspective. ZDM, 47(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0688-1
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2016). State of the art in Ethnomathematics. In Current and future perspectives of ethnomathematics as a program (pp. 11–37). Springer.
Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308602
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
Soler Pastor, E., Bobowik, M., & Benet Martínez, V. (2022). Creativity and (global, ethnic, host) cultural identifications: An examination in migrant and host national samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1007034. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007034
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022a). Adaptation and Validation of Students’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics to Indonesia. Pedagogika, 147(3), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2022.147.11
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022b). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Suherman, S., & Vidakovich, T. (2022a). Tapis Patterns in the Context of Ethnomathematics to Assess Students’ Creative Thinking in Mathematics: A Rasch Measurement. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(4), 56–72.
Suherman, S., & Vidakovich, T. (2022b). The Diagnostic Test of Mathematical Creative Thinking Development-Based Ethnomathematics (JURE). Paper Conference.
Tang, C., Duan, Q., & Long, H. (2022). How do parents influence student creativity? Evidence from a large-scale survey in China. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101134
Tang, M., Werner, C., Cao, G., Tumasjan, A., Shen, J., Shi, J., & Spörrle, M. (2018). Creative expression and its evaluation on work‐related verbal tasks: A comparison of Chinese and German samples. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.134
Tazouti, Y., & Jarlégan, A. (2019). The mediating effects of parental self-efficacy and parental involvement on the link between family socioeconomic status and children’s academic achievement. Journal of Family Studies, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2016.1241185
Team, J. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16. 3)[Computer software] 2022. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Team, R. C. (2022). R version 4.2. 2 (2022–10-31 ucrt)—" Innocent and Trusting": A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL Https://Www. R-Project. Org.
Tidikis, V., Donohue, D., Petkevičiūtė-Barysienė, D., & Rakickienė, L. (2018). The relationship between creativity and global/national identity: Comparative study of lithuanian and american students’ sample. Psichologija, 58, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2018.4
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Ülger, K., & Morsünbül, Ü. (2016). The Differences in Creative Thinking: The Comparison of Male and Female Students. Online Journal of Counseling & Education, 5(4).
Van Vo, D., & Csapó, B. (2023). Exploring Inductive Reasoning, Scientific Reasoning and Science Motivation, and Their Role in Predicting STEM Achievement Across Grade Levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10349-4
Wang, M.-Z., Chen, W., Zhang, C., & Deng, X.-L. (2017). Personality types and scholarly creativity in undergraduate students: The mediating roles of creative styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.050
Wang, R.-N., & Chang, Y.-C. (2022). Effect of Intrinsic Motivation on Junior High School Students’ Creativity: Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 297–312.
White, H. A., & Shah, P. (2011). Creative style and achievement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.015
Wu, X., Siu, K. W. M., Bühring, J., & Villani, C. (2022). The Relationship between Creative Self-Efficacy, Achievement Motivation, and Job Burnout among Designers in China’s e-Market. Social Sciences, 11(11), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110509
Zhao, X., & Yang, J. (2021). Fostering creative thinking in the family: The importance of parenting styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100920
Zheng, M., Niu, W., Wang, W., Cheng, L., Ma, T., & Park, J. H. (2023). Originality vs. Appropriateness: The Moderating Role of Culture on the Effect of Instructional Focus on Individual and Team Creativities. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.575
Ziv, A. (2014). Using humor to develop creative thinking. Humor and Children’s Development, 99–116.
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.