Evaluación en el contexto educativo: el caso de la alfabetización ambiental, la alfabetización digital y su relación con la habilidad de pensamiento matemático
Resumen
La alfabetización digital y la alfabetización ambiental son habilidades requeridas en todos los niveles educativos y representan un elemento crucial para el éxito en las habilidades del siglo XXI, especialmente la capacidad de razonamiento matemático. Sin embargo, no es una opción práctica para los contextos educativos carecer de herramientas de evaluación simples. El propósito de este proyecto es investigar las posibilidades de evaluar la alfabetización ambiental, la alfabetización digital y la habilidad de pensamiento matemático, y contribuir a las prácticas educativas. Además, se explora la relación entre la alfabetización ambiental, la alfabetización digital y la habilidad de pensamiento matemático. La muestra de este estudio fueron todos los estudiantes de secundaria de 7º a 9º grado (N = 216). Se utilizó un cuestionario que mide la alfabetización ambiental y la alfabetización digital, así como una prueba de habilidades de pensamiento matemático para recopilar datos. Los datos se analizaron utilizando el software JASP, SPSS 26, Winstep y Mplus8. Nuestra evaluación resultó ser una evaluación confiable y válida. La alfabetización digital y la alfabetización ambiental pueden predecir la habilidad de pensamiento matemático. En cuanto a este tema en el siglo XXI, el significado de este estudio es de gran importancia para los educadores e investigadores en educación.
Descargas
Citas
Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
Abdillah, R. R., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., & Biruni, I. B. (2021). Fostering students’ problem solving skills and environmental literacy through PBL with natural environmental exploration approach. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), 030009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043190
Arsyad, S., & Villia, A. S. (2022). Exploring the Effect of Digital Literacy Skill and Learning Style of Students on Their Meta-Cognitive Strategies in Listening. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15130a
Barrios-Rubio, A., & Pedrero-Esteban, L. M. (2021). The Transformation of the Colombian Media Industry in the Smartphone Era. Journal of Creative Communications, 16(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258620981347
Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Lesson unplanning: Toward transforming routine tasks into non-routine problems. ZDM, 49(7), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0885-1
Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002
Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Christian, K., Morrison, F. J., & Bryant, F. B. (1998). Predicting kindergarten academic skills: Interactions among child care, maternal education, and family literacy environments. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80054-4
Clayton, S., Bexell, S. M., Xu, P., Tang, Y. F., Li, W. J., & Chen, L. (2019). Environmental literacy and nature experience in Chengdu, China. Environmental Education Research, 25(7), 1105–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1569207
Desfandi, M. (2015a). Mewujudkan masyarakat berkarakter peduli lingkungan melalui program adiwiyata. SOSIO-DIDAKTIKA: Social Science Education Journal, 2(1), 31–37.
Desfandi, M. (2015b). Mewujudkan masyarakat berkarakter peduli lingkungan melalui program adiwiyata. SOSIO-DIDAKTIKA: Social Science Education Journal, 2(1), 31–37.
Fadlilah, N. (2018). PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR AQIDAH AKHLAK SISWA KELAS X DI SEKOLAH MAN 3 SLEMAN YOGYAKARTA.
Farida, F., Supriadi, N., Andriani, S., Pratiwi, D. D., Suherman, S., & Muhammad, R. R. (2022). STEM approach and computer science impact the metaphorical thinking of Indonesian students’. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 22(69). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.493721
Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating Scale Instrument Quality Criteria. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 21 (1), 1095.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Goldman, D., Ayalon, O., Baum, D., & Weiss, B. (2018). Influence of ‘green school certification’on students’ environmental literacy and adoption of sustainable practice by schools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1300–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.176
Graham, P. (2000). Building education for the next industrial revolution: Teaching and learning environmental literacy for the building professions. Construction Management & Economics, 18(8), 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900446876
Greenwood, C. R., Buzhardt, J., Walker, D., Jia, F., & Carta, J. J. (2020). Criterion validity of the early communication indicator for infants and toddlers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(4), 298–310.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). Exploring alternative ways of assessing prior knowledge, its components and their relation to student achievement: A mathematics based case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3–4), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.007
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Hekmah, N., Wilujeng, I., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2019). Web-Lembar Kerja Siswa IPA terintegrasi lingkungan untuk meningkatkan literasi lingkungan siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.25402
Hermida, R. (2015). The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: Concerns and considerations. Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 3(1), 5.
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37–56). Springer.
Ilhami, A. (2019). Kontribusi Budaya Lokal Terhadap Literasi Lingkungan: Studi Kasus di SMP Pandam Gadang Sumatera Barat. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 2(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v2i2.7788
Johnson, T. R. (2016). Regulatory dynamism of environmental mobilization in urban C hina. Regulation & Governance, 10(1), 14–28.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2019). National Mathematics Achievement. https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/hasil-un/
Komalasari, A. (2021). Developing 21st century education and digital literacy skills through intercultural city stories project. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/36841/pioneer.v13i1.737
Komariah, N., M. Yusup, P., Saepudin, E., & Rodiah, S. (2017). Pendidikan literasi lingkungan sebagai penunjang desa wisata agro Kecamatan Padaherang Kabupaten Pangandaran. Jurnal Aplikasi Ipteks Untuk Masyarakat, 6(2), 111–115.
Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), 505–540.
Kresnawati, N. (2014). Korelasi Kualitas Pembelajaran Geografi dan Hasil Belajar Terhadap Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Siswa Kelas XII IPS SMAN 1 Ponorogo. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 1(3), 298–303.
Kusmana, S. (2017). Pengembangan Budaya Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 1.
Kusumaningrum, D. (2018). Literasi Lingkungan Dalam Kurikulum 2013 Dan Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sd. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 1(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v1i2.255
Lee, H., Parsons, D., Kwon, G., Kim, J., Petrova, K., Jeong, E., & Ryu, H. (2016). Cooperation begins: Encouraging critical thinking skills through cooperative reciprocity using a mobile learning game. Computers & Education, 97, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.006
Levy, A., Orion, N., & Leshem, Y. (2018). Variables that influence the environmental behavior of adults. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 307–325.
Linacre, J. M. (2022). Winsteps®(Version 5.3. 0)[Computer Software].(5.3. 0). Winsteps. Com.
Liu, S.-Y., Yeh, S.-C., Liang, S.-W., Fang, W.-T., & Tsai, H.-M. (2015). A national investigation of teachers’ environmental literacy as a reference for promoting environmental education in Taiwan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.999742
Lloyd‐Strovas, J., Moseley, C., & Arsuffi, T. (2018). Environmental literacy of undergraduate college students: Development of the environmental literacy instrument (ELI). School Science and Mathematics, 118(3–4), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12266
Martono, M., & Komala, N. (2018). Concentration Conditions of Carbon Dioxide in Bukittinggi During the Event of El Niño 2015. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 118–125.
Masjaya, M., & Wardono, W. (2018). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningkatkan SDM. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 568–574.
Maskur, R., Suherman, S., Andari, T., Anggoro, B. S., Muhammad, R. R., & Untari, E. (2022). La comparación del enfoque STEM y el modelo de aprendizaje SSCS para la escuela secundaria basado en el plan de estudios K-13: El impacto en la capacidad de pensamiento creativo y crítico. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 22(70). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.507701
Maurer, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Modelling environmental literacy with environmental knowledge, values and (reported) behaviour. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100863
Mawarsih, S. E., & Hamidi, N. (2013). Pengaruh perhatian orang tua dan motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa sma negeri jumapolo. Jupe-Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 1(3).
McClaren, M. (2019). Revisioning environmental literacy in the context of a global information and communications ecosphere. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(4–6), 416–435.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2014). Concept and implementation of the 2013 Curriculum. Ministry of Education and Culture. Jakarta.
Mullenbach, L. E., & Green, G. T. (2018). Can environmental education increase student-athletes’ environmental behaviors? Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1241218
Nasution, R. (2016). Analisis kemampuan literasi lingkungan siswa SMA Kelas X di Samboja dalam pembelajaran biologi. Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 13, 352–358.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Nisbet, J., & Shucksmith, J. (2017). Learning strategies. Routledge.
Nugraha, F., Permanasari, A., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2021). Disparitas Literasi Lingkungan Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Kota Bogor. Jurnal IPA Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i1.17744
OECD. (2020). Fostering local approaches to skills in Indonesia. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/df6c4fbb-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/df6c4fbb-en
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Pe’er, S., Goldman, D., & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: Attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
Rahmah, S., Puspitasari, R., Lubis, R., & Festiyed. (2019). Analisis Buku Ajar Ipa Smp Kelas Viii Berdasarkan Pada Literasi Lingkungan. Pillar of Physics Education, 12(3), 601–608.
Rahmawati, S., Kurniati, D., & Sunardi, S. (2017). Pengembangan indikator 4 c’s yang selaras dengan kurikulum 2013 pada mata pelajaran matematika SMP/MTS kelas viii semester 1. KadikmA, 8(3), 21–30.
Rosdiana, R., Maknun, D., & Roviati, E. (2020). The Relationship between Self Efficacy and Environmental Literacy in Pollution and Environmental Changes Learning Material. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 11(2), 159–168.
Schwichow, M., Christoph, S., Boone, W. J., & Härtig, H. (2016). The impact of sub-skills and item content on students’ skills with regard to the control-of-variables strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1137651
Shaw, R. D. (2014). How Critical Is Critical Thinking? Music Educators Journal, 101(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432114544376
Simmons, D. (1995). The NAAEE Standards Project: Papers on the Development of Environmental Education Standards. ERIC.
Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Spires, H. A., Paul, C. M., & Kerkhoff, S. N. (2019). Digital literacy for the 21st century. In Advanced methodologies and technologies in library science, information management, and scholarly inquiry (pp. 12–21). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-5225-7659-4.CH002
Stiwne, E. E., & Jungert, T. (2010). Engineering students’ experiences of transition from study to work. Journal of Education and Work, 23(5), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2010.515967
Suherman, S., Rahmadani, N. A., Vidákovich, T., Fitria, N., Putri, N. I. S., Addarojat, M. R., & Priadi, M. (2021). SQ3R method assisted by ethnomathematics-oriented student worksheet: The impact of mathematical concepts understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012059
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of Mathematical Creative Thinking: A Systematic Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
Supriyanto, A. (2020). Model Pengembangan Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter dan Literasi Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v5i1p17-23
Szczytko, R., Stevenson, K., Peterson, M. N., Nietfeld, J., & Strnad, R. L. (2019). Development and validation of the environmental literacy instrument for adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 25(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1487035
Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Jumbo, F. T. (2020). Digital literacy and higher education during COVID-19 lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications, 8(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048
Vodă, A. I., Cautisanu, C., Grădinaru, C., Tănăsescu, C., & de Moraes, G. H. S. M. (2022). Exploring Digital Literacy Skills in Social Sciences and Humanities Students. Sustainability, 14(5), 2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052483
Wang, W., Ge, Y., Yu, H., Lu, X., Li, X., Cheng, Y., & Sun, X. (2022). Intertwining History and Places: The Design of TongSEE Location-Based Augmented Reality Application for History Learning. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06015-1_11
Wei, W., Li, Y., & Su, H.-Y. (2020). Predicting the growth patterns in early mathematics achievement from cognitive and environmental factors among Chinese kindergarten children. Learning and Individual Differences, 79, 101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101841
Wyndham, F. S. (2010). Environments of learning: Rarámuri children’s plant knowledge and experience of schooling, family, and landscapes in the Sierra Tarahumara, Mexico. Human Ecology, 38, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9287-5
Ziya, E., Dogan, N., & Kelecioglu, H. (2010). What Is the Predict Level of Which Computer Using Skills Measured in PISA for Achievement in Mathematics. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), 185–191.
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.