Integración tutelada de inteligencia artificial generativa en el Trabajo de Fin de Grado: una experiencia formativa y ética en el Grado de Medicina.

Carlos Santiago Piñel Pérez

doi:10.6018/edumed.679941

Autores

Carlos Santiago Piñel Pérez Hospital Quirónsalud San José / Universidad Europea https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6647-8718

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.679941

Palavras-chave: Inteligencia Artificial Generativa, Educación Médica, Trabajo de Fin de Grado, Tutoría Académica, Ética Académica, Pensamiento Crítico, Competencias Investigadoras

Resumo

A chegada da inteligência artificial generativa (IAG) ao ensino superior tem transformado os processos de ensino, aprendizagem e pesquisa, especialmente em etapas formativas como o Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (TCC). Este artigo apresenta uma experiência piloto de integração tutelada de ferramentas de IAG no TCC de quatro estudantes do curso de Medicina. Por meio de um desenho qualitativo e exploratório, foram aplicados instrumentos como guias éticas, rubricas, diários reflexivos e questionários, com o objetivo de promover um uso crítico, formativo e ético dessas tecnologias. Os resultados revelam percepções majoritariamente positivas, melhorias na autonomia e na redação acadêmica, bem como uma consciência crítica sobre os riscos associados, como a atribuição inadequada ou a geração de informações incorretas. A experiência sugere que a IAG, quando acompanhada por tutoria crítica e protocolos éticos, pode se tornar uma ferramenta valiosa para o desenvolvimento de competências investigativas.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Metrics

Views/Downloads

Resumo
168
pdf (Español (España))
174
pdf
174

Referências

Chan C, Hu W. Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.

Yabaku M, Ouhbi S. University Students' Perception and Expectations of Generative AI Tools for Software Engineering. 2024 36th Int Conf Softw Eng Educ Train (CSEE&T). 2024, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET62301.2024.10663035.

Arowosegbe A, Alqahtani J, Oyelade T. Perception of generative AI use in UK higher education. Front Educ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1463208.

Gasaymeh A, Beirat M, Qbeita A. University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Educ Sci. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062.

Kim J, Klopfer M, Grohs J, et al. Eldardiry H, Weichert J, Cox L, et al. Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses. Innov High Educ. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09774-w.

Alzubi A, Nazim M, Alyami N. Do AI-generative tools kill or nurture creativity in EFL teaching and learning? Educ Inf Technol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8.

McDonald N, Johri A, Ali A, et al. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines. Comput Human Behav Artif Humans. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121.

Yusuf A, Pervin N, Román-González M. Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2024, 21, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6.

Jin Y, Yan L, Echeverría V, et al. Generative AI in Higher Education: A Global Perspective of Institutional Adoption Policies and Guidelines. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2024, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.11800.

Gonsalves C. Generative AI’s Impact on Critical Thinking: Revisiting Bloom’s Taxonomy. J Mark Educ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241305980.

Essien A, Bukoye O, O’Dea C, et al. The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Stud High Educ. 2024, 49, 865-882.https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881

Bae H, Bozkurt A. The Untold Story of Training Students with Generative AI: Are We Preparing Students for True Learning or Just Personalization? Online Learn. 2024. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4689.

Namanya D, Talibong MPC. Harnessing the Potential of AI Tools for Student Thesis Research and Writing: An Appreciative Inquiry. Pan-Afr J Educ Soc Sci. 2025, 6(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.56893/pajes2025v06i01.03.

Han Y. Beyond the Algorithm: Reconciling Generative AI and Human Agency in Academic Writing Education. Int J Learn Teach. 2025;11(1):39-42.

Guillén-Yparrea N, Hernández-Rodríguez F. Unveiling Generative AI in Higher Education: Insights from Engineering Students and Professors. 2024 IEEE Global Eng Educ Conf (EDUCON). 2024, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ EDUCON60312.2024.10578876.

Rodafinos A. The Integration of Generative AI Tools in Academic Writing: Implications for Student Research. Soc Educ Res. 2025, 6(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.6220256517.

Yang T, Cheon J, Cho MH, et al. Undergraduate students’ perspectives of generative AI ethics. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2025, 22, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00533-1.

Costa K, Ntsobi PM, Mfolo L. Challenges, Benefits and Recommendations for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing - A Case of ChatGPT. Med Clin Educ Technol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.55162/MCET.07.236.

Universidad de Granada. Boletín Oficial de la Universidad de Granada, nº 260. Acuerdo sobre el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en los Trabajos de Fin de Grado y Máster. 2023. Available from: https://secretariageneral.ugr.es/sites/webugr/secretariageneral/public/inline-files/BOUGR/260/Bolet%C3%ADn%20Oficial%20de%20la%20Universidad%20de%20Granada%20n%C2%BA%20260_26.pdf

Holechek S, Sreenivas V. Abstract 1557 Generative AI in Undergraduate Academia: Enhancing Learning Experiences and Navigating Ethical Terrains. J Biol Chem. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105921.

Park J, Jang M, Oh S. Analysis of the Experience of Using Generative AI and the Needs of Writing Education of Foreign Undergraduates. Korean Assoc Gen Educ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2024.18.1.185.

Plecerda LP. Academic integrity surrounding the use of generative AI in higher education: Lenses from ICT college students. Environ Soc Psychol. 2024. htpps://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i12.3177.

Nowacki L, Wrochna AE. ChatGPT theses. Identifying distinctive markers in AI-generated versus human-created texts: A multimodal analysis in university education. E-Learn Digit Media. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530251331083.

Holmes W, Porayska-Pomsta K, Holstein K, Sutherland E, Baker T, Shum S, et al. Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2021, 32, 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.

Mujtaba B. Clarifying Ethical Dilemmas in Sharpening Students’ Artificial Intelligence Proficiency: Dispelling Myths About Using AI Tools in Higher Education. Bus Ethics Leadersh. 2024. https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.8(2).107-127.2024.