Los argumentos de Orosio en la polémica pagano-cristiana

Autor/innen

  • Pedro Martínez Cavero

Abstract

In his HISTORY, Orosius attacks the pagans, developing some arguments that we study here. He compiles from other author's works the misfortunes that took place in history and compares them with the ones of his time, affirming that the former are seen as less grave for having become literary topics. He rests importance to the fall of Rome in 410 and fills the narration with providential facts. He also defends the antiquity and universality of Christianity, as well as the unity of the history of all the humanity, which he articulates around the theory of the four Monarchies of Daniel. The Roman Republic is deprived of its myth but he appraises Augustus'monarchy, integrating some pagan concepts in the Christian vision of history. He finally demonstrates that Christianity is not the cause of the decadence of Rome because the Empire itself is the product of Christianity.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Metriken
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    370
  • PDF (Español (España))
    602
Veröffentlicht
24-05-1990
Zitationsvorschlag
Martínez Cavero, P. (1990). Los argumentos de Orosio en la polémica pagano-cristiana. Antigüedad Y Cristianismo, (7), 319–331. Abgerufen von https://revistas.um.es/ayc/article/view/61741

Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in