Approach to digital teaching competence in vocational training
Abstract
World requires people with knowledge, skills and attitudes that allow a full development of citizenship in a digital ecosystem. An educational response to this social demand is digital competence. Thus, this purpose requires optimal levels of Digital Teaching Competence (DTC), especially in the Vocational Education Training (VET) sector. With the aim of attending to this educational context, this work proposes a understanding framework that integrates the vision of pedagogy, resources and evaluation to understand, evaluate and propose improvements in the digital competence of VET teachers. Using a qualitative approach, eleven in-depth interviews were conducted on the DTC of VET teachers in the province of Valencia (Spain). These data were analysed from the categorization of 4 educational scenarios with technology (individual learning, teaching with ICT, collaborative learning and student self-learning). The main conclusion detected is that interviewed teachers have knowledge of some technological resources and applications, attitude and ability to incorporate them into their teaching practice. However, they do not integrate technology in the learning assessment at the same competence level as in the other dimensions.
Downloads
References
Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2018). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294-306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
Adams, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Ala-Mutka, K., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2008). Digital competence for lifelong learning. Sevilla: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC. Disponible en ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/EURdoc/JRC48708.TN.pdf
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries, EDU Working paper no. 41.
Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning: Foundations and Applications (pp. 35-50). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Attwell, G. & Hughes, J. (2010). Pedagogic approaches to using technology for learning: Literature review. Wales: Pontydysgu: Lifelong Learning UK. Disponible en http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/2021/
Badia, A. (2015). Research trends in technology-enhanced learning, Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 38(2), 253-278. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1016744
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1. The digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. Disponible en: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC106281/web-digcomp2.1pdf_(online).pdf
Cedefop (2020). Vocational education and training in Europe, 1995-2035: scenarios for European vocational education and training in the 21st century. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop reference series; No 114. Disponible en: http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/794471
Chatti, M.A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International journal of knowledge and learning, 3(4-5), 404-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016702
Cobo, C. (2019). Acepto las condiciones. Usos y abusos de las tecnologías digitales. Madrid: Fundación Santillana.
Crisp, G. (2011). Teacher’s Handbook on e-Assessment. Disponible en: http://transformingassessment.com/sites/default/files/files/Handbook_for_teachers.pdf
Daniela, L. (Ed.) (2018). Didactics of smart pedagogy: Smart pedagogy for technology enhanced learning Cham: Springer. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers y education, 59(2), 423-435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Esteve, F. (2015). La competencia digital docente. Análisis de la autopercepción y evaluación del desempeño de los estudiantes universitarios de educación por medio de un entorno 3D (tesis doctoral). Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/291441
European Commission (2010). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Disponible en: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF
Fabregat Pitarch, A., y Gallardo Fernández, I. M. (2019). Desarrollo de competencias digitales para emprendedores desde un aula de Formación Profesional. En E. Sánchez, J. Ruiz y E. Sánchez, Innovación y tecnología en contextos educativos (790-800). Málaga: UMA editorial. Disponible en: http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/71885
Fainholc, B., Nervi, H., Romero, R., & Halal, C. (2015). La formación del profesorado y el uso pedagógico de las TIC. Revista De Educación a Distancia (RED), 38. Disponible en: https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/234081
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Seville. doi: https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gisbert, M., y Esteve, F. (2011). Digital Learners: la competencia digital de los estudiantes universitarios. La cuestión universitaria, 7, 48-59. Recuperado de http://polired.upm.es/index.php/lacuestionuniversitaria/article/view/3359/3423
Gisbert, M.; Esteve, V. y Lázaro, J.L. (eds.) (2019) ¿Cómo abordar la educación del futuro? Conceptualización, desarrollo y evaluación desde la competencia digital docente. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M (2016). Literacy and the digital university, en C. Haythornthwaite, R. Andrews y J. Fransman, The SAGE Handbook of e-learning Research (423-442). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Gros, B. (2016). The Dialogue Between Emerging Pedagogies and Emerging Technologies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_1
Gudmundsdottir, G.B. & Hatlevic, O.E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers' professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
Hall, R., Atkins, L., & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The digilit lecister project. Research in Learning Technology, 22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440
Hatlevik, O.E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers' self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555-567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501
Hernández, R. y Salinas, B. (2008): La evaluación didáctica como componente del diseño/desarrollo curricular, en A. De la Herrán y J. Paredes: Didáctica general: la práctica de la enseñanza en educación infantil, primaria y secundaria (pp. 235-248). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Ibarrola, M. (2009). Formación de profesionales de la ETP. En F. Blas, y J. Planells (Eds.), Retos actuales de la educación técnico-profesional (pp. 73-88). Madrid: OEI, Fundación Santillana.
ISTE. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Kirschner, P., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker, Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
Lewin, D., & Lundie, D. (2016). Philosophies of digital pedagogy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(3), 235-240. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9514-7
Lizandra, J., Ros-Garrido, A., Suárez-Guerrero, C., & Marhuenda, F. (2019). Digital competence of VET teachers: Illustrations from non-technological professions. In B. E. Stalder & C. Nägele (Eds.) Trends in vocational education and training research, Vol. II. Proceedings of the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), (pp.250–258). Vocational Education and Training Network (VETNET). doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3371515
Loveless, A. (2011). Technology, pedagogy and education: reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 301-316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.610931
Loveless, A., & Williamson, B. (2013). Learning identities in a digital age: Rethinking creativity, education and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Marhuenda-Fluixá, F. (2012). La Formación Profesional. Madrid: Síntesis.
Marhuenda-Fluixá, F. & Ros-Garrido, A. (2015). What sense can we make of the possibility of vocational didactics? An approach from the Spanish school-based system complemented by non-formal vocational training. International journal for research in vocational education and training, 2(3), 170-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.2.3.3
Marhuenda-Fluixá, F., Chisvert-Tarazona, M. J., Palomares-Montero, D., y Vila, J. (2017). Con d de dual: investigación sobre la implantación del sistema dual en la formación profesional en España. Educar, 53(2), 285-307. doi: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.821
MECD (2013). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. V. 2.0. Disponible en http://educalab.es/documents/10180/12809/MarcoComunCompeDigiDoceV2.pdf/e8766a69-d9ba-43f2-afe9-f526f0b34859
Mishra, P. y Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A Framework for Teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Montanero, M.M. (2019). Métodos pedagógicos emergentes para un nuevo siglo ¿Qué hay realmente de innovación? Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 31(1), 5-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/teri.19758
Morris, S. (2013). Decoding Digital Pedagogy, pt. 1: Beyond the LMS. Hybrid Pedagogy, https://hybridpedagogy.org/decoding-digital-pedagogy-pt-1-beyond-the-lms/
Organización para la Cooperación y Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) (2011). Preparándose para trabajar. Barcelona: Fundación Barcelona FP. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264118478-es
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I), Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: OECD. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/23129638
Peters, M. A., Liu, T.C., & Ondercin, D.J. (2012). The Pedagogy of the Open Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-967-1
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (No. JRC107466). Joint Research Centre. doi: https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Ros-Garrido, A., & Marhuenda-Fluixá, F. (2019). The Education of VET Teachers and Trainers. In F. Marhuenda-Fluixá (ed.). The School-Based Vocational Education and Training System in Spain (pp. 87-103). Springer, Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8475-2
Salas-Ruiz, J. y Sánchez-Rivas, E. (2019). Incorporación de aplicaciones informáticas en la Formación Profesional. Un estudio de caso. En E. Sánchez, J. Ruiz y E. Sánchez, Innovación y tecnología en contextos educativos (pp. 751-759). Málaga: UMA editorial.
Salinas, J., De Benito, B., y Lizana, A. (2014). Competencias docentes para los nuevos escenarios de aprendizaje. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 78(1), 145-163.
Saran, S.; Chapman, T. y Sharma, M. (2018). A New Social Contract for the Digital Age. Disponible en: https://t20argentina.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/A-New-Social-Contract-for-the-Digital-Age-Vision-Brief-ORF-4-10-18-TC_Edits-3.pdf
Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591-604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557496
Suárez-Guerrero, C. (2014) Pedagogía red, Cuadernos de pedagogía, 449, 76-80. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/1nfogNf
Suárez-Guerrero, C., Lloret-Catalá, C. & Mengual, S. (2016). Teachers' Perceptions of the Digital Transformation of the Classroom through the Use of Tablets: A Study in Spain. Comunicar, 49, 81-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-08
Suárez-Guerrero, C; Lizandra, J. y Ros, A. (2020). Análisis pedagógico de la competencia digital docente en la educación técnico profesional, Libro de ponencias, XXII Congreso Internacional Tecnología e innovación para la diversidad de los aprendizajes EDUTEC 2019, pp. 948-962. Lima: PUCP.
Szymielewicz, K. (2019). Your digital identity has three layers, and you can only protect one of them. Disponible en: https://qz.com/1525661/your-digital-identity-has-three-layers-and-you-can-only-protect-one-of-them/
Turner, D. (2017). The learning wheel: A model of digital pedagogy. Social Work Education, 36(8), 959–960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1331529
UNESCO (2008). ICT competency standard for teachers. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000156210
UNESCO (2011). ICT Competency Framework for Teachers Version 2.0. UNESCO. Disponible en: https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214694.pdf
Valtonen, T., Pontinen, S., Kukkonen, J., Dillon, P., Väisänen, P., & Hacklin, S. (2011). Confronting the technological pedagogical knowledge of Finnish Net Generation student teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 3–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.534867
Valverde, J. (2010). El movimiento de “Educación Abierta” y la “Universidad Expandida”, Tendencias Pedagógicas, 16, 157-180. Disponible en. https://revistas.uam.es/tendenciaspedagogicas/article/view/1948/2059
Van Acker, F., Van Buuren, H., Kreijns, K., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Why teachers use digital learning materials: The role of self-efficacy, subjective norm and attitude. Education and Information Technologies, 18(3), 495-514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9181-9
Veletsianos, G. (2011). Designing opportunities for transformation with emerging technologies. Educational Technology, 41-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25316/IR-44
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero S., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. doi: https://doi.org/10.2791/11517
White, D. S., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171
Wiley, D. (2013). What is Open Pedagogy? Disponible en: https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975
Williams, P. (2017). Assessing collaborative learning: big data, analytics and university futures. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 978-989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1216084
Williamson, B (2018). Big Data en Educación. El futuro digital del aprendizaje, la política y la práctica. Madrid: Morata.
Copyright (c) 2021 Distance Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
