TBL on a Course of Law at the University of Barcelona: Improving Academic Indicators
Abstract
The present paper shows a comparison between three different instructional strategies for learning. The three strategies were simultaneously applied in a bachelor course in the autumn semester 2012 (September-January) at the Law School at Barcelona University in Spain. The students of the course “Undertaking and Market Law” (rectius, Intellectual Property and Competition Law) were divided in three different groups, named M, O and T. The group M got simple lectures (conventional lecturing); the group O got an oriented learning and the group T was organised using the new strategy of active and collaborative learning of Team Based Learning (TBL). The student’s performance in the 3 different groups was compared using final score and satisfaction survey. The results showed that the students of the T group achieved higher scores than the students of the groups O and M. The difference of the results of the groups O and M related to the results of the group T was strongly significant (Chi-Square=66.719 ; df=4; p=0.000. The opposite analysis is true, with fails. The percentage of fails with oriented learning or Lecturing was high, 74% and 44% respectively, while with TBL strategy, students fails drop till 6%. The comparative result for satisfaction survey in the three groups also shows a tendency of higher student’s satisfactions when TBL strategy is used versus historical averages of satisfaction in the previous versions of the course. In conclusion, TBL generated better performances in this course of law, dropping significantly the rate of fails and increasing final higher scores, and consequently increases student’s satisfaction with TBL as compared with the other 2 strategies. The results of this pilot-study are clear and consistent with other studies in other knowledge areas (Engineering, Health, Basic Sciences, Social Sciences). This confirms the superiority of active and participatory strategies as the TBL in front of the traditional teaching.Downloads
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.