Preferencias de las plataformas de medios sociales de los estudiantes de educación superior con fines educativos
Resumen
El objetivo del estudio es determinar las clasificaciones de preferencia de las preferencias de la plataforma de redes sociales de los estudiantes de educación superior con fines educativos. La plataforma de redes sociales más utilizada en la que las personas pasan más tiempo son Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, WhatsApp y Facebook en Turquía. Estas nueve plataformas de redes sociales se escalaron utilizando el método de comparación por pares. Los participantes del estudio fueron 492 estudiantes de educación superior en Turquía. El análisis de los datos se realizó utilizando la ecuación de estado de Thurstone V. En esta investigación, las herramientas de redes sociales preferidas por los estudiantes de educación superior con fines educativos se enumeran respectivamente como Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, Twitter, Snapchat, Telegram, Pinterest, Facebook / FB Messenger y TikTok. Además, se examinan las preferencias de los estudiantes de educación superior de ambos sexos sobre las herramientas de medios sociales con fines educativos. De acuerdo con esto, para las estudiantes femeninas, se enumera respectivamente como WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, Snapchat, Pinterest, Telegram, TikTok y Facebook / FB Messenger; y para los estudiantes masculinos, se enumera respectivamente como Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, Twitter, Telegram, Facebook / FB Messenger, Snapchat y Pinterest.
Descargas
Citas
Abdullah, M. A. (2022). Predictors of quality of distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i1.6685
Abu-Ayfah, Z. A. (2019). Telegram App in Learning English: EFL Students’ Perceptions. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n1p51
Acarsoy, C. (2019, September 23). How not to use social media? Leidenpsychologyblog. https://www.leidenpsychologyblog.nl/articles/how-not-to-use-social-media
Akgün, İ. H. (2021). An Investigation of Social Studies Teacher Candidates’ Use of Mobile Instant Messaging Within the Framework of the Technology Acceptance Model: The Case of WhatsApp. International Journal of Field Education, 7(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.32570-ijofe.1034582-2123721
Aktaş, B., Kurt, K., & Turan, A. H. (2019). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Medya Kullanım Tercihlerinin İncelenmesi. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1–15.
Aladsani, H. K. (2021). University Students’ Use and Perceptions of Telegram to Promote Effective Educational Interactions: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(9), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.19281
Alahmad, M. (2020). The Effectiveness of Telegram App in Learning English. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(3), 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i3.1165
Alcayde, A., Montoya, F. G., Salmerón-Manzano, E., Perea-Moreno, A.-J., Baños, R., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2017). TELEGRAM BOT FOR M-LEARNING AT CLASSROOM. 8675–8683. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.2057
Alcayde García, A., Salmeron-Manzano, E., Zapata-Sierra, A., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2022). A TELEGRAM BOT FOR EDUCATION 4.0: ZQUIZUALBOT 4.0. 7288–7295. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.1842
Amer, B., & Amer, T. S. (2018). Use of Pinterest to Promote Teacher-Student Relationships in a Higher Education Computer Information Systems Course. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 19.
Badge, J. L., Saunders, N. F. W., & Cann, A. J. (2012). Beyond marks: New tools to visualise student engagement via social networks. Research in Learning Technology, 20(0). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16283
Br Depari, M. Y., Devi, L. S., Sianipar, E., & Herman, H. (2022). Students’ Perception of Using Telegram in Learning English at SMK Negeri 1 Bandar Masilam. Education and Human Development Journal, 7(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v7i2.3188
Burden, A. (2018). Pinterest: Pinning the Gap Between SoTL and SLCE in Higher Education. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 6(1), Article: 9.
Carpenter, J., Cassaday, A., & Monti, S. (2018). Exploring How and Why Educators Use Pinterest. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2222–2229. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182833
Çelik, B., Demirbaş-Çelik, N., & Uzunboylu, H. (2021). Which is New: Scaling Social Media Usage Preferences Via Pair-Wise Comparison. In E. Aydemir & S. Sağlık (Eds.), Research and Reviews in Social, Human and Administrative Sciences—II (First Edition, pp. 131–148). Gece Publishing.
Çetinkaya, L. (2017). The Impact of Whatsapp Use on Success in Education Process. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3279
Chapman, S., Wright, P., & Pascoe, R. (2019). Criticality and connoisseurship in arts education: Pedagogy, practice and ‘Pinterest © ’. Education 3-13, 47(8), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1544578
Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2
Coleman, E., & O’Connor, E. (2019). The role of WhatsApp® in medical education; a scoping review and instructional design model. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1706-8
Comp, G., Dyer, S., & Gottlieb, M. (2021). Is TikTok The Next Social Media Frontier for Medicine? AEM Education and Training, 5(3), aet2.10532. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10532
Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Rodríguez Lera, F. J., Gutiérrez-Fernández, A., & Guerrero-Higueras, Á. M. (2021). WhatsApp or Telegram. Which is the Best Instant Messaging Tool for the Interaction in Teamwork? In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences (Vol. 12784, pp. 239–249). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_16
Davies, T., Lorne, C., & Sealey-Huggins, L. (2019). Instagram photography and the geography field course: Snapshots from Berlin. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(3), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1608428
Draganić, K., Marić, M., & Lukač, D. (2021). An application of TikTok in higher education. E-Education, 1, 114–119. https://ebt.rs/journals/index.php/conf-proc/article/view/75
Duncan, I., Yarwood-Ross, L., & Haigh, C. (2013). YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1576–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.013
Erkuş, A. (2019). Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme-I Temel Kavramlar ve İşlemler (4th ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786053643111
Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Alguacil, M., & López-Carril, S. (2021). Incorporating TikTok in higher education: Pedagogical perspectives from a corporal expression sport sciences course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 28, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100302
Everson, M., Gundlach, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Social media and the introductory statistics course. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A69–A81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.033
Fauzan, F., Arifin, F., Lubis, M. A., & Firdaus, F. M. (2022). Lecturer’s digital literacy ability in the pandemic. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(4), 1130–1142. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i4.7122
Fenn, P., & Reilly, P. J. (2020). Problematising the use of Snapchat in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. The Journal of Social Media for Learning, 140-146 Pages. https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.JSML.VOL1ARTICLE383
Fiallos, A., Fiallos, C., & Figueroa, S. (2021). Tiktok and Education: Discovering Knowledge through Learning Videos. 2021 Eighth International Conference on EDemocracy & EGovernment (ICEDEG), 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG52154.2021.9530988
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Franz, A. K. (2012). Organic Chemistry YouTube Writing Assignment for Large Lecture Classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100589h
Fraticelli, L., Smentek, C., Tardivo, D., Masson, J., Clément, C., Roy, S., Dussart, C., Bourgeois, D., & Carrouel, F. (2021). Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13260. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413260
Göncü, S. (2018). Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Y Kuşağının WhatsApp Kullanımı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. TRT Akademi, 3(6), 590–612.
Griffiths, M. D., & Kuss, D. J. (2017). Adolescent Social Media Addiction (Revisited). Education and Health, 35(3), 49–52.
Güler, N., İLhan, M., & Taşdelen Teker, G. (2018). İkili Karşılaştırmalarla Ölçekleme Yöntemi ile Rasch Analizinden Elde Edilen Ölçek Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.400386
Handayani, F. (2017). Students’ Aattitudes Toward Using Instagram in Teaching Writing. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/educative.v2i1.318
Hayes, C., Stott, K., Lamb, K. J., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). “Making Every Second Count”: Utilizing TikTok and Systems Thinking to Facilitate Scientific Public Engagement and Contextualization of Chemistry at Home. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3858–3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511
Heyang, T., & Martin, R. (2022). Teaching through TikTok: A duoethnographic exploration of pedagogical approaches using TikTok in higher dance education in China and Norway during a global pandemic. Research in Dance Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2022.2114446
Hong, J.-C., Chen, M.-L., & Ye, J.-H. (2020). Acceptance of YouTube Applied to Dance Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1331
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Sánchez-Santamaría, J., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Abella-García, V. (2019). Social networks to promote motivation and learning in higher education from the students’ perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(4), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1579665
Huebner, E. J. (2022). TikTok and museum education: A visual content analysis. International Journal of Education Through Art, 18(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00095_1
Hutchinson, A. (2020, May 28). TikTok Announces #LearnOnTikTok Initiative to Encourage Education During Lockdowns. Social Media Today. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/tiktok-announces-learnontiktok-initiative-to-encourage-education-during-lo/578805/
İlhan, E., & Görgülü Aydoğdu, A. (2019). YOUTUBE KULLANICILARININ KULLANIM MOTİVASYONLARININ İNCELENMESİ. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 1130–1153. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.570677
Iqbal, M., Alradhi, H., Alhumaidi, A., Alshaikh, K., AlObaid, A., Alhashim, M., & AlSheikh, M. (2020). Telegram as a Tool to Supplement Online Medical Education During COVID-19 Crisis. Acta Informatica Medica, 28(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.94-97
Ismawati, D., & Prasetyo, I. (2020). The Development of Telegram BOT Through Short Story: Proceedings of the Brawijaya International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences and Technology (BICMST 2020). Brawijaya International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences and Technology (BICMST 2020), Malang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201021.049
Izadpanah, S. (2021). EVALUATING THE ROLE OF PINTEREST IN EDUCATION AND THE PROFESSION OF INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE. Idil Journal of Art and Language, 10(87). https://doi.org/10.7816/idil-10-87-01
Jnr Gyane, S. O. (2021). PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENTS ON THE USE OF TELEGRAM DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Acta Informatica Malaysia, 5(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.26480/aim.01.2021.21.24
Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success: Twitter collaboration & engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
Karatsoli, M., & Nathanail, E. (2020). Examining gender differences of social media use for activity planning and travel choices. European Transport Research Review, 12(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00436-4
Kemp, S. (2022a). Digital 2022 Global Overview Report (No. v05; Digital 2022). We Are Social, Hootsuite. https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2022-global-overview-report-january-2022-v05?qid=13068acc-7ec3-4496-a711-046494b824fb&v=&b=&from_search=1
Kemp, S. (2022b). Digital 2022 Turkey (No. v01; Digital 2022). We Are Social, Hootsuite. https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2022-turkey-february-2022-v01?qid=926d4dc7-88db-4c18-af0f-1fb6280a608f&v=&b=&from_search=216
Khademolhosseini, F., Noroozi, A., & Tahmasebi, R. (2017). The Effect of Health Belief Model-Based Education through Telegram Instant Messaging Services on Pap smear performance. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2221
Khalil, M., & Rambech, M. (2022). Eduino: A Telegram Learning-Based Platform and Chatbot in Higher Education. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Novel Technological Environments (Vol. 13329, pp. 188–204). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05675-8_15
Khalitova, L., & Gimaletdinova, G. (2016). Mobile technologies in teaching English as a foreign language in higher education: A case study of using mobile application Instagram. 1, 6155--6161. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016
Khan, R., & Carroll, C. (2017). Snapchat as a Tool for Medical Education and Opportunity for Engagement. Chest, 152(4), A544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.574
Kim, K.-S., Sin, S.-C. J., & Tsai, T.-I. (2014). Individual Differences in Social Media Use for Information Seeking. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.001
Klein, A. Z., Junior, J. C. da S. F., Mattiello da Silva, J. V. V. M., Barbosa, J. L. V., & Baldasso, L. (2018). The Educational Affordances of Mobile Instant Messaging (MIM): Results of Whatsapp® Used in Higher Education. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 16(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2018040104
Kunka, B. A. (2020). Twitter in higher education: Increasing student engagement. Educational Media International, 57(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1848508
Lehman, C. M., DuFrene, D. D., & Lehman, M. W. (2010). YouTube Video Project: A “Cool” Way to Learn Communication Ethics. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569910385382
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment: Is Facebook a tool suitable for learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015: Is Facebook a suitable TEL environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12154
Mpungose, C. B., & Khoza, S. B. (2022). Postgraduate Students’ Experiences on the Use of Moodle and Canvas Learning Management System. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09475-1
Nikookam, Y., & Guckian, J. (2021). TikTokTM and dermatology: Lessons for medical education. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 46(5), 952–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14624
Okazaki, S., & Renda dos Santos, L. M. (2012). Understanding e-learning adoption in Brazil: Major determinants and gender effects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1266
Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
Pimmer, C., Brühlmann, F., Odetola, T. D., Oluwasola, D. O., Dipeolu, O., & Ajuwon, A. J. (2019). Facilitating professional mobile learning communities with instant messaging. Computers & Education, 128, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.005
Pinterest. (2022). İn Vikipedi. https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pinterest&oldid=27950986
Pratama, M. R. A., Dewi, M. K., & Susilowati, E. (2022). Integrating Camtasia, YouTube, and Google Classroom to create asynchronous learning environments. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(5), 1549–1563. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7671
Pratiwi, A. E., Ufairah, N. N., & Sopiah, R. S. (2021). UTILIZING TIKTOK APPLICATION AS MEDIA FOR LEARNING ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION. 11.
Ramos, F., & Fernández-Diego, M. (2013). USING PINTEREST IN EDUCATION: A COLLABORATIVE COLLECTION OF MARKETING ADS. INTED2013 Proceedings, 287–292.
Reyna, J. (2021). #InstaLearn: A Framework to Embed Instagram in Higher Education. 1, 164–172. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/j/EDMEDIA/v/2021/n/1/
Saini, C., & Abraham, J. (2019). Implementing Facebook-based instructional approach in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 128, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.025
Şen Yaman, G. (2016). Yabancı Dil Olarak Arapça Öğretiminde WhatsApp Kullanımı. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 37–47.
Snap Inc. (2022). https://www.snap.com/en-GB?lang=tr-TR
Soon, M. K. S., Martinengo, L., Lu, J., Car, L. T., & Chia, C. L. K. (2022). The Use of Telegram in Surgical Education: Exploratory Study. JMIR Medical Education, 8(3), e35983. https://doi.org/10.2196/35983
Srinivasacharlu, A. (2020). Using YouTube in Colleges of Education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(2), 21–24.
Sturgeon, C. M., & Walker, C. (2009). Faculty on Facebook: Confirm or Deny? In Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED504605
Syah, R. J., Nurjanah, S., & Andri Mayu, V. P. (2020). Tikio (TikTok App Educational Video) Based on the Character Education of Newton’s Laws Concepts Preferred to Learning for Generation Z. Pancaran Pendidikan, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v9i4.325
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Using Twitter for education: Beneficial or simply a waste of time? Computers & Education, 106, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.004
Tekindal, S. (2015). Duyuşsal Özelliklerin Ölçülmesi İçin Araç Oluşturma (3rd ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Telegram. (2022). İn Telegram (software). https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telegram_(yaz%C4%B1l%C4%B1m)&oldid=28718371
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288
TikTok. (2022). İn Vikipedi. https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TikTok&oldid=28772681
Trier, J. (2007a). “Cool” Engagements With YouTube: Part 1. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.5.7
Trier, J. (2007b). “Cool” Engagements With YouTube: Part 2. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(7), 598–603. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.7.8
Turgut, M. F., & Baykul, Y. (1992). Ölçekleme teknikleri (2nd ed.). ÖSYM yayınları.
Twitter. (2022). About Twitter | Our Company and Priorities. https://about.twitter.com/
Warburton, E. C. (2022). TikTok challenge: Dance education futures in the creator economy. Arts Education Policy Review, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2022.2095068
WhatsApp. (2022). WhatsApp.com. https://www.whatsapp.com/about/
Wiranegara, D. A., & Hairi, S. (2020). CONDUCTING ENGLISH LEARNING ACTIVITIES BY IMPLEMENTING TELEGRAM GROUP CLASS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 3(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v3i2.11122
Xiuwen, Z., & Razali, A. B. (2021). An Overview of the Utilization of TikTok to Improve Oral English Communication Competence among EFL Undergraduate Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(7), 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090710
Xodabande, I. (2017). The effectiveness of social media network telegram in teaching English language pronunciation to Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1347081. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1347081
Yilmazsoy, B., Kahraman, M., & Köse, U. (2020). Negative Aspects of Using Social Networks in Education: A Brief Review on WhatsApp Example. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.662746
Zan, N. (2019). Communication Channel Between Teachers and Students in Chemistry Education: WhatsApp. US-China Education Review A, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2019.01.002
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
