The Role of Bayesian Approaches in Medical Education for Enhancing Evidence-Based Medicine.
Resumo
The increasing complexity of clinical decision-making in evidence-based medicine (EBM) highlights the need for probabilistic reasoning. Bayesian theory provides a structured framework to integrate prior knowledge with new evidence, yet its use in medical education remains limited. This paper argues that incorporating Bayesian approaches improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces reliance on heuristic judgments. Educational strategies such as case-based learning help bridge theory and practice, while Bayesian methods strengthen the link between research and clinical decision-making. Despite challenges such as perceived complexity and variability in estimating pre-test probabilities, these barriers reflect gaps in pedagogy. We conclude that Bayesian reasoning should be integrated as a core component of medical training to better address clinical uncertainty.
Downloads
-
Resumo0
-
pdf (Español (España))0
-
xml (Español (España))0
-
Infografía (Español (Espa...0
Referências
1. Kass R, & Raftery A. Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995, 90(430), 773-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
2. Schoot R, Depaoli S, Gelman A, King R, Kramer B, Märtens K, et al. Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00003-0
3. Benbassat J. Teaching Clinical Reasoning to Undergraduate Medical Students. Thinking Like a Policy Analyst. 2005, 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980939_3
4. Brush J, Lee M, Sherbino J, Taylor-Fishwick J, & Norman G. Effect of Teaching Bayesian Methods Using Learning by Concept vs Learning by Example on Medical Students’ Ability to Estimate Probability of a Diagnosis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019, 2(12), e1918023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18023
5. Nelson A. An Interactive Workshop Reviewing Basic Biostatistics and Applying Bayes' Theorem to Diagnostic Testing and Clinical Decision-Making. MedEdPORTAL. 2018, 14, 10771 https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10771
6. Elstein A. On the origins and development of evidence-based medicine and medical decision making. Inflamm Res. 2004, 53(S2), S184–S189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-004-0357-2
7. Helgason C, & Jobe T. Causality and clinical medicine: Using fuzzy measures for patient prediction and experimental design. NAFIPS Annu Meet. 2008, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/nafips.2008.4531320
8. Cahan A, Gilon D, Manor O, & Paltiel O. Probabilistic reasoning and clinical decision-making: do doctors overestimate diagnostic probabilities?. QJM. 2003, 96(10), 763-769. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg122
9. Phelps M, & Levitt M. Pretest Probability Estimates: A Pitfall to the Clinical Utility of Evidence‐based Medicine?. Acad Emerg Med. 2004, 11(6), 692-694. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.022
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Múrcia
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista estão sujeitos aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Murcia (o editor) preserva os direitos económicos (direitos de autor) das obras publicadas e favorece e permite a sua reutilização ao abrigo da licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
2. Os trabalhos são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-NãoDerivada 4.0.
3. Condições de autoarquivamento. Os autores estão autorizados e incentivados a divulgar eletronicamente as versões pré-impressas (versão antes de ser avaliada e enviada à revista) e / ou pós-impressas (versão avaliada e aceita para publicação) de seus trabalhos antes da publicação, desde que favorece sua circulação e difusão mais precoce e com ela possível aumento de sua citação e alcance junto à comunidade acadêmica.
This is a Diamond Journal 
