Meta-aggregation as a Methodological Approach for the Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence in Medical Education.
Resumo
The advancement of evidence-based medical education has led to a growing interest in qualitative research, particularly for understanding learning experiences, educational processes, and institutional dynamics. However, the increasing volume of qualitative studies has created challenges regarding their systematic integration and practical application. In this context, meta-aggregation has emerged as a robust methodological approach that enables the synthesis of qualitative evidence while preserving the original meaning of findings, thereby enhancing their applicability in real-world educational settings .
Downloads
-
Resumo0
-
pdf 2
-
xml (Español (España))0
Referências
1. Lockwood C, Munn Z, & Porritt, K. Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
2. Hannes K, & Lockwood C. Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2011, 67(7), 1632–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05636.x
3. Maeda Y, Kenney R, & Lolkus M. Meta-aggregation: Methodological guidance and lessons learned on an approach to qualitative synthesis for mathematics education research. J Res Math Educ. 2023, 54(5), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2021-0113
4. Ooijen W, Malfait S, Waal G, & Hafsteinsdóttir T. Nurses’ motivations to leave the nursing profession: A qualitative meta-aggregation. J Adv Nurs. 2023, 79, 4455–4471. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15696
5. Rourke S, Dimech A, Bacon R, & Paterson, C. The lived experiences of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023, 80, 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103555
6. Silva B, Bachelard M, Amoussou J R, Martinez D, Bonalumi C, Bonsack C, Golay P, & Morandi S. Feeling coerced during voluntary and involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: A review and meta-aggregation of qualitative studies. Heliyon. 2023, 9(2), e13420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13420
7. Coatsworth-Puspoky R, Duggleby W, Dahlke S, & Hunter K. Prioritizing qualitative meta-synthesis findings in a mixed methods systematic review study: A description of the method. Res Synth Methods. 2025, 16(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2024.8
8. Hannes K, Petry K, & Heyvaert M. The meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. Int J Res Method Educ. 2017, 41(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1299124
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Múrcia
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista estão sujeitos aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Murcia (o editor) preserva os direitos económicos (direitos de autor) das obras publicadas e favorece e permite a sua reutilização ao abrigo da licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
2. Os trabalhos são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-NãoDerivada 4.0.
3. Condições de autoarquivamento. Os autores estão autorizados e incentivados a divulgar eletronicamente as versões pré-impressas (versão antes de ser avaliada e enviada à revista) e / ou pós-impressas (versão avaliada e aceita para publicação) de seus trabalhos antes da publicação, desde que favorece sua circulação e difusão mais precoce e com ela possível aumento de sua citação e alcance junto à comunidade acadêmica.
This is a Diamond Journal 
