Meta-aggregation as a Methodological Approach for the Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence in Medical Education.
Abstract
The advancement of evidence-based medical education has led to a growing interest in qualitative research, particularly for understanding learning experiences, educational processes, and institutional dynamics. However, the increasing volume of qualitative studies has created challenges regarding their systematic integration and practical application. In this context, meta-aggregation has emerged as a robust methodological approach that enables the synthesis of qualitative evidence while preserving the original meaning of findings, thereby enhancing their applicability in real-world educational settings .
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
pdf2
-
xml (Español (España))0
References
1. Lockwood C, Munn Z, & Porritt, K. Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
2. Hannes K, & Lockwood C. Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2011, 67(7), 1632–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05636.x
3. Maeda Y, Kenney R, & Lolkus M. Meta-aggregation: Methodological guidance and lessons learned on an approach to qualitative synthesis for mathematics education research. J Res Math Educ. 2023, 54(5), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2021-0113
4. Ooijen W, Malfait S, Waal G, & Hafsteinsdóttir T. Nurses’ motivations to leave the nursing profession: A qualitative meta-aggregation. J Adv Nurs. 2023, 79, 4455–4471. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15696
5. Rourke S, Dimech A, Bacon R, & Paterson, C. The lived experiences of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023, 80, 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103555
6. Silva B, Bachelard M, Amoussou J R, Martinez D, Bonalumi C, Bonsack C, Golay P, & Morandi S. Feeling coerced during voluntary and involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: A review and meta-aggregation of qualitative studies. Heliyon. 2023, 9(2), e13420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13420
7. Coatsworth-Puspoky R, Duggleby W, Dahlke S, & Hunter K. Prioritizing qualitative meta-synthesis findings in a mixed methods systematic review study: A description of the method. Res Synth Methods. 2025, 16(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2024.8
8. Hannes K, Petry K, & Heyvaert M. The meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. Int J Res Method Educ. 2017, 41(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1299124
Copyright (c) 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
This is a Diamond Journal 
