Learning during a simulation training program: a conceptual replication
Abstract
(1) Introduction: The widespread adoption of healthcare simulation as a teaching tool has led to a growth in training programs for simulation instructors. However, there are few studies documenting the effectiveness of these programs. The objective was to study the transformation experienced by participants in an on-site edition of a specific training program and compare the possible differences observed with a previously studied and published online edition of the same program. (2) Methods. The program consisted of a 15-day online interactive module, four 8-hour face-to-face days on site, and an individual online session with one of the instructors. Each day on-site resulted in individual written reflections that were categorized according to the learning themes described by Kolbe and Rudolph (2018). (3) Results: 25 subthemes were identified that include a total of 78 elements identified in the 38 responses of the participants, categorized according to five learning themes: notes to self, evaluations, metacognitions, anticipations of applications, and emotions. (4) Conclusion: A comparable professional development progression was identified between the on-site face-to-face (the current study) and online (the previously published study) format.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Cook DA. How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Med Educ, 2014, 48(8), 750-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12473
Armijo-Rivera S, Machuca-Contreras F, Raul N, de Oliveira SN, Mendoza IB, Miyasato HS, et al. Characterization of simulation centers and programs in Latin America according to the ASPIRE and SSH quality criteria. Adv Sim, 2021, 6, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00188-8
Opazo EI, Rojo E, Maestre JM. Modalidades de formación de instructores en simulación clínica: El papel de una estancia o pasantía. Educ Méd, 2017, 18(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.07.008
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach, 2005, 27, 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach, 2013, 35, e867-98. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
Leppink J, Losey C, Rojo E, Del Moral I, Maestre JM. ¿Qué te llevas para tu práctica profesional? Temas clave de un programa de formación de instructores en simulación. Sim Clín, 2023, 5(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.35366/110988
Kolbe M, Rudolph JW. What’s the headline on your mind right now? How reflection guides simulation-based faculty development in a master class. BMJ STEL, 2018, 0, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000247
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 2008, 300(10), 1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1181
Anzelin I, Marín-Gutiérrez A, & Chocontá J. Relación entre la emoción y los procesos de enseñanza aprendizaje. Sophia, 2020, 16(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.18634/sophiaj.16v.1i.1007
Torres CET, Rodríguez JC. Los entornos de aprendizaje inmersivo y la enseñanza a ciber-generaciones. Educ Pesq, 2019, 45, e187369. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634201945187369
Pérez Alcalá MDS. La comunicación y la interacción en contextos virtuales de aprendizaje. Apert, 2009, 1(1), 34-37. Disponible online (visitado el 20 de septiembre de 2023): https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=68820815003
Mahmood S. Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID-19 pandemic. Hum Behav Emerg Technol, 2021, 3(1), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.218
Rajab MH, Gazal AM, Alkattan K. Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 2020, 12, e8966–e8966. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966
Bennett AA, Campion ED, Keeler KR, Keener SK. Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. J Appl Psychol, 2021, 106(3), 330-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000906
Shockley KM, Gabriel AS, Robertson D, Rosen CC, Chawla N, Ganster ML, Ezerins ME. The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment. J Appl Psychol, 2021, 106(8), 1137-1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000948
Andrade-Lotero LA. Teoría de la carga cognitiva, diseño multimedia y aprendizaje: un estado del arte Magis. Rev Int Invest Educ, 2012, 5(10), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m5-10.tccd
Hospital virtual Valdecilla. Entrenamiento para instructores en simulación ofrecido por el Institute for Medical Simulation (IMS). Disponible online (visitado el 20 de septiembre de 2023): https://www.hvvaldecilla.es/entrenamiento-de-instructores-cursos-ifms
Instructure Inc. Usted. El poder de la plataforma de gestión del aprendizaje Canvas. Disponible online (visitado el 20 de septiembre de 2023): https://www.instructure.com/es-es/canvas
Guest G, Namey E, Chen M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15, e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Leppink J, Paas F, Van der Vleuten CPM, Van Gog T, Van Merriënboer JJG. Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behav Res Met, 2013, 45, 1058-72. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1
Formstack. Automate work, innovate faster. Disponible online (visitado el 20 de septiembre de 2023): https://www.formstack.com
Roussin CJ, Weinstock P. SimZones: An organizational innovation for simulation programs and centers. Acad Med, 2017, 92, 1114-1120. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001746
Maestre JM, Rudolph JW. Teorías y estilos de debriefing: El método con buen juicio como herramienta de evaluación formativa en salud. Rev Esp Card, 2015, 68, 282-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05.018
Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: The role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc, 2014, 9(6), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047
Angel CJ, Valdes JC, Guzman T. Límites, desafíos y oportunidades para enseñar en los mundos virtuales. Innov Educ, 2017, 17(75), 149-168. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-26732017000300149&lng=es&tlng=es
Pizarro MS. Influencia de la comunicación no verbal en las relaciones interpersonales. Ciencia Lat Rev Cient Multidisc, 2021, 5(4), 3881-3894. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v5i4.591
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Sim Health, 2006, 1(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01266021-200600110-00006.
-
Abstract289
-
pdf (Español (España))268
-
pdf268
Copyright (c) 2023 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
