Sophistic’ Apostles. Classical characterizations as foreigners and magicians in the five major apocryphal Acts
Abstract
The Platonic dialogues present a vivid portrayal of the sophists and Socrates through the eyes of characters who often perceive their activities in a negative light. These descriptions emphasize rhetorical prowess, perceived as manipulative or even magical. Similarly, non-Christian characters in the apocryphal Acts describe the apostles using terminology reminiscent of the characterization of both sophists and Socrates, emphasizing their foreignness, itinerant nature, and persuasive or miraculous abilities. The accusations of corruption and the preaching of a new deity parallel those levelled against Socrates. The linguistic and literary parallels between these portrayals suggest a deliberate association, reflecting broader social perceptions of persuasive figures challenging established norms at a narrative level. Understanding these connections sheds light on the socio-cultural context of the early Christian world, suggesting a continuity of themes and perceptions across diverse literary traditions.
Downloads
-
Abstract33
-
PDF17
-
EPUB0
References
Artés, José A. 1999. Estudio sobre la lengua de los Hechos Apócrifos de Pedro y Pablo. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
Barrier, Jeremy W. 2009. The Acts of Paul and Thecla. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151613-9
Billings, Joshua and Moore, Christopher (eds.) 2023. The Cambridge Companion to the Sophists. Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859639
Bernabé, Alberto 2013. The Sixth Definition (Sophist 226a-231c): Transposition of Religious Language. In Bossi, Beatriz and Robinson, Thomas M. (Eds.), Plato’s Sophist Revisited, 37-45. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110287134.41
Bollók, János 1996. The Description of Paul in the Acta Pauli. In Bremmer, Jan N. (Ed.), The Apocryphal Acts of Paul and Thecla, 6–15. Kampen: Kok Pharos.
Bovon, François. 2001. Milagro, magia y curación en Hechos apócrifos de los apóstoles. In Piñero, Antonio (Ed.), En la frontera de lo imposible. Magos, médicos y taumaturgos en el Mediterráneo antiguo en tiempos del Nuevo Testamento, 263-287. Córdoba: El Almendro.
Bremmer, Jan N. 2001. The Acts of Thomas: Place, Date and Women. En Bremmer, Jan N. (Ed.), The Apocryphal Acts of Thomas, 83-86. Leuven: Peeters.
Bremmer, Jan N. 2001. The Apocryphal Acts: Authors, Place, Time and Readership. In Bremmer, Jan N. (Ed.), The Apocryphal Acts of Thomas, 149-170. Leuven: Peeters.
Burrus, Virginia 1987. Chastity as Autonomy: Women in the Stories of the Apocryphal Acts. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
Byrskog, Samuel. 1994. Jesus the Only Teacher: Didactic Authority and Transmission in Ancient Israel, Ancient Judaism and the Matthean Community. Stockholm: Almqvist-Wiksell.
Davies, Stevan L. 1983. The Revolt of the Widows. Carbondale-Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Del Cerro, Gonzalo 1993. Los Hechos Apócrifos de los Apóstoles: Su género literario. Estudios Bíblicos 51, 207–232.
Dell’Isola, Maria 2022. Violence against Women in the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles: Some Insights on the Acts of Thomas and the Acts of John. Vetera Christianorum 59, 107-120.
Dickie, Matthew W. 2001. Magic and Magicians in the Graeco-Roman World. London-New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203278109
Dillon, John and Gergel, Tania 2003. The Greek Sophists. London: Penguin Books.
Dobschutz, Ernst von 1902. Der Roman in der alt-christlichen Literatur. Deutsche Rundschau 111, 87-106.
Eyl, Jennifer. 2012. Why Thekla Does Not See Paul: Visual Perception and the Displacement of Erōs in the Acts of Paul and Thekla 3. In Futre Pinheiro, Marília P.; Perkins, Judith and Pervo, Richard (Eds.), The Ancient Novel and Early Christian and Jewish Narrative: Fictional Intersections, 3-19. Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing-Groningen University Library.
Faraone, Christopher A. 2001. Ancient Greek Love Magic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Flint, Valerie. 1999. The Demonization of Magic and Sorcery in Late Antiquity: Christian Redefinitions of Pagan Religions. In Flint, Valerie; Gordon, Richard; Luck, Georg and Ogden, Daniel, Witchcraft and Magic in Europe: Ancient Greece and Rome, 279–348. London: Athlone Press.
Giannini, Alessandro 1963. Studi sulla paradossografia greca, I. Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo 97, 247-260.
Giménez Delgado, José Vicente 2020. Los viajes de Pablo y Tecla: caminos, campos y ciudades. In López Salvá, Mercedes (Ed.), En los albores del cristianismo, 105-118. Reus: Rhemata.
Grant, Robert M. 1977. Early Christianity and Society: Seven Studies. New York: Harper-Row.
Grant, Robert M. 1982. The Description of Paul in the Acts of Paul and Thecla. Vigiliae Christianae 36, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007282X00251
Grau, Sergi 2024. Building a Palace in Heaven: Sapiential Stories within Biographies and the Acts of Thomas. In Muñoz Gallarte, Israel and Roig Lanzillotta, Lautaro, New Trends in the Research on the Apocryphal Acts of Thomas, 111-130. Leuven: Peeters. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12406174.11
Graziani, Françoise and Zucker, Arnaud (eds.) 2018. Mythographie de l’étranger dans la Méditerranée ancienne. Paris: Classiques Garnier.
Guthrie, William Keith Chambers 1979. The Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilhorst, Antonius. The Heavenly Palace in the Acts of Thomas. In Bremmer, Jan N. (Ed.), The Apocryphal Acts of Thomas, 53-64. Leuven: Peeters.
Hunter, Richard and Rutherford, Ian (eds.) 2009. Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture. Travel, Locality and Panhellenism. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576133
Jacobs, Andrew S. 1999. A Family Affair: Marriage, Class, and Ethics in the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles. Journal of Early Christian Studies 7, 105-138. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.1999.0018
Jacobs, Andrew S. 2006. «Her Own Proper Kinship»: Marriage, Class and Women in the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles. In Levine, Amy-Jill and Robbins Maria Mayo (Eds.), A Feminist Companion to the New Testament Apocrypha, 19-46. Cleveland: The Pilgrim Press.
Jaeger, Werner 1961. Early Christianity and Greek Paideia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Junod, Éric 1981. Les Vies de philosophes et les Actes apocryphes : un dessein similaire ?. In Bovon, François ; Junod, Éric and Kaestli, Jean-Daniel (Eds.), Les actes apocryphes des apôtres. Christianisme et monde païen, 209-219. Genève : Labor et fides.
Junod, Éric and Kaestli, Jean-Daniel 1983a. Acta Iohannis. Praefatio – Textus. Turnhout: Brepols.
Junod, Éric and Jean-Daniel Kaestli. 1983b. Acta Iohannis. Textus alii – Commentarius. Indices. Turnhout: Brepols.
Kaestli, Jean-Daniel 1981. Les scènes d’attribution des champs de mission et de départ de l’apôtre dans les actes apocryphes. In Bovon, François ; Junod, Éric and Kaestli, Jean-Daniel (Eds.), Les actes apocryphes des apôtres. Christianisme et monde païen, 249-264. Genève: Labor et fides.
Karasson, Ioannis 1995. Old Testament Quotations in the Apocryphal Acts. In Bremmer, Jan N., The Apocryphal Acts of John, 57-71. Kampen: Kok Pharos.
Kartzow, Marianne Bjelland. 2018. The Slave Metaphor and Gendered Enslavement in Early Christian Discourse. London–New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351241618
Kerferd, George B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Konstan, David. 1998. Acts of Love: A Narrative Pattern in the Apocryphal Acts. Journal of Early Christian Studies 6, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.1998.0013
Lequeux, Xavier 2007. La circulation des Actes apocryphes des Apôtres condamnés par Photius, jusqu’à l’époque de Nicétas le Paphlagonien. Apocrypha 18, 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.305750
Levine, Amy-Jill and Robbins, Maria Mayo (Eds.) 2006. A Feminist Companion to the New Testament Apocrypha. Cleveland: The Pilgrim Press.
Lipsius, Richard Adelbert 1891. Acta apostolorum apocrypha. Vol. 1. Lipsiae: Teubner.
Luttikhuizen, Gerard 1998. Simon Magus as a Narrative Figure in the Acts of Peter. In Bremmer, Jan N., The Apocryphal Acts of Peter: Magic, Miracles and Gnosticism, 39-51. Leuven: Peeters.
Malherbe, Abraham J. 1986. A Physical Description of Paul. Harvard Theological Review 79, 170-175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000020435
Marrou, Henri I. 1960. Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Miralles, Carmen 1996. Novela, aretalogía, hagiografía. Synthesis 3, 3-18.
Muñoz Gallarte, Israel and Narro, Ángel 2020. Some notes on Andrapolis, the Royal City: Apocryphal Acts of Thomas 3. Collectanea Christiana Orientalia 18, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.21071/cco.v18i0.1163
Narcy, Michel 2013. Remarks on the First Five Definition of the Sophist (Soph. 221c-235a). In Bossi, Beatriz and Robinson, Thomas M., Plato’s Sophist Revisited, 57-70. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110287134.57
Norelli, Enrico 2007. L’episodio del Quo vadis? Tra discorso apocrifo e discorso agiografico. Sanctorum 4, 15-45.
O’Grady, Patricia (Ed.) 2008. The Sophists: an Introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
Omerzu, Heike 2008. The Portrayal of Paul’s Outer Appearance in the Acts of Paul and Thecla: Re-Considering the Correspondence between Body and Personality in Ancient Literature. Religion & Theology 15, 252–279. https://doi.org/10.1163/157430108X376537
Osiek, Carolyn and Balch, David L. 1997. Families in the New Testament World: Households and House Churches. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Osiek, Carolyn and Macdonald, Margaret Y. 2006. A woman’s place: house churches in earliest Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Patlagean, Evelyn 1991. Remarques sur la diffusion et la production des apocryphes dans le monde byzantin. Apocrypha 2, 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301293
Pervo, Richard I. 2003. The Ancient Novel Becomes Christian. In Schmeling, Gareth (Ed.), The Novel in the Ancient World, 685–712. Boston-Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004496439_033
Poupon, Gérard 1981. L’accusation de magie dans les Actes apocryphes. In Bovon, François ; Junod, Éric and Kaestli, Jean-Daniel (Eds.), Les actes apocryphes des apôtres. Christianisme et monde païen, 71-94. Genève: Labor et Fides.
Roig Lanzillotta, Lautaro 2007. Acta Andreae Apocrypha. A New Perspective on the Nature, Intention and Significance of the Primitive Text. Genève: Patrick Cramer Éditeur.
Romilly, Jacqueline de 1982. The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sierksma-Agteres, Suzan 2024. Paul and the philosophers’ faith: discourses of pistis in the Graeco-Roman World. Leiden-Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004684539
Söder, Rosa 1932. Die Apokryphen Apostelgeschichten und die romanhafte Literatur der Antike. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
Tell, Håkan 2011. Plato’s counterfeit. Washington: Center for Hellenistic Studies.
Van Pelt, Julie 2021. From the Acts of Peter to the Life of Leo of Catania: Distinguishing Magic and Miracle. In Nicklas, Tobias; Spittler, Janet E. and Bremmer, Jan N. (Eds.), The Apostles Peter, Paul, John, Thomas and Philip with their Companions in Late Antiquity, 55-80. Leuven: Peeters. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1vwbtck.8
Warren, David H. 1999. The Greek Language of the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles: A Study in Style. In Bovon, François; Brock, Ann G. and Matthews, Christopher R. (Eds.), The Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles, 101-124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Witmer, Stephen E. 2008. Divine Instruction in Early Christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151589-7
Zachariades-Holmberg, Eleni 1999. Philological Aspects of the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles. In Bovon, François; Brock, Ann G. and Matthews, Christopher R. (Eds.), The Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles, 125-143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ángel Narro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The authors non-exclusively assign the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, communication and transformation) to the magazine.
2. The works published in this magazine are subject to the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC By SA 4.0). Therefore, they can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that:
i) the authorship and the original source of its publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work) are cited, thus allowing its recognition.
ii) it is allowed to remix, transform or create from the material while maintaining the same license as the original.
Note: Articles prior to 2022 incorrectly display the CC by SA license in the abstract page. They are under a CC by NC ND license as embedded in the article pdfs. Articles published in 2022 and after are under the CC by SA license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (version before being evaluated) and/or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) versions of their works before publication, as it favors their publication. Earlier circulation and diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community. Color RoMEO: verde.
