The critical incident as a tool to recertify the pediatric specialty.

Authors

  • Alicia Fayad Medica nefrologa infantil
  • Miriam Tonietti Vocal titular del Comité de Evaluación Profesional Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría
  • Ana María Soria Vocal titular del Comité de Evaluación Profesional Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría
  • Rubén Gurevech Vocal titular del Comité de Evaluación Profesional Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría
  • Patricio Insaurralde Vocal titular del Comité de Evaluación Profesional Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría
  • Horacio Yulitta Ex.Presidente del Comité de Evaluación Profesional Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.595631
Keywords: Critical Incident, Recertification, Medical criteria

Supporting Agencies

  • No funding was received

Abstract

The practice of the medical profession in our specialty requires an adequate skills profile which includes knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values. The critical Incident (CI) is a structured narrative in which the professional describes any event that occurred during the daily medical activity, which triggers doubts or perplexity, motivating actions and thoughtful thinking that improve the professional development. Objectives: to describe rresults of the IC performed in the recertification process, the factors associated with its approval, and to evaluate whether the CI is an appropriate tool to be included as part of the recertification process. Methodology: descriptive analytical cross-sectional study. Results: eleven CIs (73%) were approved; the most frequent reason for choosing CI was the need to improve score levels for achieving recertification (73%); Age: median 52 years (IQR 49 to 58); 100% were female; 48% were trained in specialized hospitals and the time of recertification was 120 months (IQR 96 to 122). Knowledge Domain: 14% developed an adequate clinical scenario and 13% the research question, and 20% made an adequate summary. In Practice Domain:35% implemented appropriate profesional strategies; 13% of the other effectors developed appropriate strategies and only 7% carried out complete bibliographic searches in their action plan. Reflective Learning Domain: the results inherent to the patient (33%) and the professional (20%), carried out an adequate comprehensive approach; on the final reflections 13% and 15% developed adequately strengths and weaknesses, respectively in relation to the clinical case. Conclusions: Professionals obtaining approved ICs were the ones who achieved a comprehensive approach of the patient and his problem, this condition being related to having achieved the adequate development of reflective learning (knowing to be-clinical reasoning). Based on these results, we could assume that the IC could be an appropriate tool to include in the recertification process. No statistical association was found between the investigated variables and the approval of the CI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Página web de la Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría. https://www.sap.org.ar/uploads/archivos/general/files_baremo-cep-06-23_1685706184.pdf

Flanagan J. The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 51 (4): 327-58. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0061470

Morán Barrios J, Ruiz de Gauna P, Ruiz Lázaro PM, Calvo R. Metodologías complementarias de aprendizaje para la adquisición de competencias en la formación de especialistas y actividades profesionales confiables. Educación Médica, 2020, 21: 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.02.001

Guyatt GH, Haynes R, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature XXV. Evidence- Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users' Guides to Patient Care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA, 2000, 284 (10): 1290-1296. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.10.1290

Dresh S, Murno J, y col. Criterio Médico. Definición, proceso y evaluación (1ª parte). Arch. Arg. de Pediatría, 1998, 96: 39-45. https://www.sap.org.ar/docs/publicaciones/archivosarg/1998/98_39_45.pdf

Dresh S, Murno J, y col. Criterio Médico. Definición, proceso y evaluación (2ª parte). Arch. Arg. de Pediatría, 1998, 96:108-120. https://www.sap.org.ar/docs/publicaciones/archivosarg/1998/98_108_121.pdf

Almendro Padilla C; Costa Alcaraz A. Alerta roja: el incidente crítico, aprendiendo de nuestros errores. Tribuna docente online, Formación de posgrado, 2006, 8: 1-8. https://semfyc.eventszone.net/jornadas2019/uploads/docs/IncidenteCritico.pdf

Rodríguez de Castro F, T Carrillo-Díaz T, Freixinet-Gilart J, Julià-Serdà G. Razonamiento Clínico. FEM, 2017, 20 (4): 149-160. https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.204.903

Bruster BG, Peterson BR. Using critical incidents in teaching to promote reflective practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 2013, 14 (2): 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732945

Saura Llamas J , Medina Abellán MA, Guirao Salina FA, Martínez Garra MN y col. Cómo afectan los incidentes críticos a los residentes de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria. Rev. Clin. Med. Fam, 2022, 15 (1): 20-27. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1699-695X2022000100005

Published
05-04-2024
How to Cite
Fayad, A., Tonietti, M., Soria, A. M., Gurevech, R., Insaurralde, P., & Yulitta, H. (2024). The critical incident as a tool to recertify the pediatric specialty. Spanish Journal of Medical Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.595631

Most read articles by the same author(s)