The Effect of the Valence of Imagined Contact with Immigrants on Adolescents’ Stereotype Content: The Importance of Perceived Typicality

Authors

  • Andreea A. Constantin University of Almería, Department of Psychology and Centre for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), Almería (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-8346
  • Isabel Cuadrado University of Almería, Department of Psychology and Centre for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), Almería (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0946-2696
  • Lucía López-Rodríguez University of Almería, Department of Psychology and Centre for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), Almería (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-0220
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.439041
Keywords: Contact valence, Stereotype content, Perceived typicality, Devalued inmigrants

Abstract

Across two studies, we examined the effect of imagined intergroup contact valence on Spanish adolescents’ stereotype content of Ecuadorian and Moroccan immigrants considering the moderator role of perceived typicality and ethnic origin on this effect. Study 1 (N = 133) showed that, only for Moroccans, when the interaction partner was perceived as highly typical, Moroccans were perceived as more moral and sociable after an imagined positive contact than after a negative one. In contrast, when the interaction partner was perceived as atypical, Moroccans were perceived as more moral and sociable after a negative imagined interaction than after a positive one. Study 2 (N = 113) broadly replicated these findings and confirmed the stronger effect of negative imagined contact on stereotypes. Only when the imagined contact was negative and the interaction partner was perceived as typical, contact altered adolescents’ perceptions and impaired Moroccans’ perceived sociability. Our findings highlight the context-dependency of the effect of contact valence and the importance of the perceived typicality for the generalization of its effects on stereotype content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aberson, C. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743-760. doi: 10.1177/1368430214556699

Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., ..., Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629-1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953

Bekhuis, H., Ruiter, S., & Coenders, M. (2013). Xenophobia among youngsters: The effect of inter-ethnic contact. European Sociological Review, 29, 229-242. doi:10.1093/esr/jcr057

Beelmann, A., & Heinemann, K. S. (2014). Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 10-24. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002

Bless, H., Schwarz, N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Thiel, L. (2001). Personalized versus generalized benefits of stereotype disconfirmation: Trade-offs in the evaluation of atypical exemplars and their social groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 386-397. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1459

Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255-343. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5

Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (pp. 74-103). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Brambilla, M., Ravenna, M., & Hewstone, M. (2012). Changing stereotype content through mental imagery: Imagining intergroup contact promotes stereotype change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 305-315. doi: 10.1177/1368430211427574

Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Turner, R., Holman-Nicolas, R., & Powell, C. (2011). 'Changing attitudes with a little imagination': Imagined contact effects on young children's intergroup bias. Anales de Psicología, 27, 708-717.

Constantin, A. A., & Cuadrado, I. (2020). “We believe, we feel, we act”: Testing the BIAS Map predictions during adolescence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50, 22-32.doi:10.1111/jasp.12638

Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Constantin, A. A. (2020). A matter of trust: Perception of morality increases willingness to help through positive emotions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23, 462-480. doi:10.1177/1368430219838606

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., …, Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Toward universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. doi:10.1348/014466608X314935

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

Harwood, J., Joyce, N., Chen, C.-Y., Paolini, S., Xiang, J., & Rubin, M. (2017). Effects of Past and Present Intergroup Communication on Perceived Fit of an Outgroup Member and Desire for Future Intergroup Contact. Communication Research, 44, 530-555. doi: 10.1177/0093650214565926

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Kotzur, P. F., Schäfer, S. J., & Wagner, U. (2019). Meeting a nice asylum seeker: Intergroup contact changes stereotype content perceptions and associated emotional prejudices and encourage solidarity-based collective action intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 668-690. doi:10.1111/bjso.12304

Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1997). When exceptions prove the rule: How extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 965-979.

Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234

López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Aplicación extendida del Modelo del Contenido de los Estereotipos (MCE) hacia tres grupos de inmigrantes en España [Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) toward three immigrant groups in Spain]. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 197-208. doi: 10.1174/021093913806751375

López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2017). I will help you because we are similar: Quality of contact mediates the effect of perceived similarity on facilitative behaviour towards immigrants. International Journal of Psychology,52, 273-282. doi:10.1002/ijop

López-Rodríguez, L., Navas, M., Cuadrado, I., Coutant, D., & Worchel, S. (2014). The Majority’s Perceptions about Adaptation to the Host Society of Different Immigrant Groups: The Distinct Role of Warmth and Threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 34-48. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.02.001

Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 3-26. doi:10.1177/1368430213510573

McIntyre, K., Paolini, S., & Hewstone, M. (2016). Changing people’s views of outgroups through individual-to-group generalisation: meta-analytic reviews and theoretical considerations. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 63-115. doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1201893

Paolini, S., Harwood, J., & Rubin, M. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723-1738. doi: 10.1177/0146167210388667

Paolini, S., & Mcintyre, K. (2019). Bad is Stronger Than Good for Stigmatized, but Not Admired Outgroups: Meta-Analytical Tests of Intergroup Valence Asymmetry in Individual-to-Group Generalization Experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 3-47. doi: 10.1177/1088868317753504

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 427-441. doi:10.1177/1368430207081533

Vauclair, C. M., Rodrigues, B. R., Marques, S., Esteves, C. S., Cunha, F., & Gerardo, F. (2018). Doddering but dear… even in the eyes of young children? Age stereotyping and prejudice in childhood and adolescence. International Journal of Psychology, 53, 63-70. doi:10.1002/ijop.12430

Published
19-04-2022
How to Cite
Constantin, A. A., Cuadrado, I., & López-Rodríguez, L. (2022). The Effect of the Valence of Imagined Contact with Immigrants on Adolescents’ Stereotype Content: The Importance of Perceived Typicality. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 38(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.439041
Issue
Section
Social Psychology

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
1
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
627
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)