New Horizons in the study of High Ability: Gifted and talented

  • Maria-Dolores Prieto Universidad de Murcia
  • Mercedes Ferrando Universidad de Murcia
Keywords: giftedness and talent, research, diversity.

Abstract

The following piece of work serve as introduction to the monographic issue about giftedness and talented in the Annals of Psychology Journal. In it, the reasons to tackle this monographic are explained, and the contributions of authors are summarized. such contributions are diverse and swing from the identification process using different procedures, the assessment of domain specific creativity in sciences, the study of the heterogeneity within the group of high ability students, the educational measures available, and lastly and study about these students' academic motivations. The work concludes extracting some general conclusions about what this monographic has contribute and it's meaning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195-205.

Chart, H., Grigorenko, E.L., & Sternberg, R.J. (2008). Identification: The Aurora Battery. J.A. Plucker & C.M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 281-301). Waco, TX: Prufrock.

Lubart, T.I. & Zenasni, F. (2010). A new look at creative giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 53–57.

Lubart, T.I., Besançon, M., & Barbot, B. (2011). Evaluation du Potentiel Créatif (EPoC). (Test psychologique et Manuel). Paris: Editions Hogrefe France.

Renzulli, J. S., & Gaesser, A. H. (2015). Un sistema multicriterial para la identificación del alumnado de alto rendimiento y de alta capacidad creativo-productiva. Revista de Educación, 368, 96-131.

Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2013). Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT): A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(3), 315-328.

Stanley, J. C. (1996). SMPY in the beginning. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225-235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stanley, J.C. (1976). Special fast-mathematics classes taught by college professors to fourth- through twelfth-graders. In D.P. Keating (ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 132-159). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stanley, J.C., Keating, D., & Fox, L. (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development (pp. 101-125). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22(4), 231-235.

Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful Intelligence: A model for testing Intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 76-84.

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3-54.

Tourón, J. & Tourón, M. (2011). The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature. Talent Development & Excellence, 3(2), 187-202.

Wechsler, D. (2005). Manuel d’administration et de cotation du WISC-IV. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

Published
28-07-2016
How to Cite
Prieto, M.-D., & Ferrando, M. (2016). New Horizons in the study of High Ability: Gifted and talented. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 617-620. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259301
Section
Monographic theme: High Ability (giftedness and talent)