¿Es posible transferir el aprendizaje de un texto de comparación-contraste a otro tipo de tareas? Análisis de los efectos de la instrucción estratégica
Resumen
El programa de Instrucción de la Autorregulación Cognitiva (CSRI) se basa en la instrucción centrada en la estrategia e incluye tres componentes para la mejora del producto textual (enseñanza directa, modelado y práctica entre iguales). Se plantearon como objetivosanalizar si la instrucción con el programa CSRI en un género textual (texto de comparación) conducía a la transferencia espontánea en el producto textual (mejor coherencia, estructura y calidad) en un género no instruido (texto de opinión); y examinar si el orden de los componentes instruccionales presentaba algún efecto. Participaron 126 estudiantes de cuarto de educación primaria que fueron asignados a una de las dos condiciones experimentales en las que se aplicaba el programa CSRI (con diferente secuencia de los componentes instructivos), o a una condición de control en la que se seguía la enseñanza tradicional. Los resultados reflejaron que las dos secuencias de instrucción del programa CSRI mostraban beneficios en la estructura y coherencia del producto textual de los estudiantes en el posttest pero no 8 meses después. Para que los alumnos sean capaces de transferir adecuadamente lo aprendido a géneros textuales no instruidos, necesitan que los profesores les enseñen cómo hacerlo eficazmente.
Descargas
Citas
Beauvais, C., Olive, T., & Passerault, J. M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022545
Bouwer, R., Béguin, A., Sanders, T., & Van den Bergh, H. (2015). Effect of genre on the generalizability of writing scores. Language Testing, 32(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214542994
Bouwer, R., Koster, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of a strategy-focused instructional program on the writing quality of upper elementary students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
Brunstein, J. C., & Glaser, C. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders' composition skills: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 922–938. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024622
Carter, O. B., Patterson, L. J., Donovan, R. J., Ewing, M. T., & Roberts, C. M. (2011). Children’s understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 962–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.018
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Erlbaum.
De La Paz, S. (2007). Managing cognitive demands for writing: comparing the effects of instructional components in strategy instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560701277609
De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2018). Fostering writing in upper primary grades: A study into the distinct and combined impact of explicit instruction and peer assistance. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9787-4
De Smedt, F., Graham, S., & Van Keer, H. (2020). “It takes two”: The added value of structured peer-assisted writing in explicit writing instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article e101835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101835
Deane, P. (2018). The challenges of writing in school: Conceptualizing writing development within a sociocognitive framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844
Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 694–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
Fidalgo, R., & Torrance, M. (2017). Developing writing skills through cognitive self-regulation instruction. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 89–118). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_006
Fidalgo, R., Harris, K. R., & Braaksma, M. (2017). Design principles for teaching effective writing: An introduction. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 3–10). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_002
Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., and Álvarez, M. L. (2015). Strategy-focused writing instruction: Just observing and reflecting on a model benefits 6th grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.004
Graham, S. (2018). Introduction to conceptualizing writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1514303
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2017). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in Writing Series: Design Principles for Teaching Effective Writing (Vol. 34, pp. 13-37). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_003
Graham, S., & Alves, R.A. (2021). Research and teaching writing. Reading and Writing 34(7), 1613–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10188-9
Graham, S., Harris, K., & Chambers, A. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction: A review of reviews. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 211-226). The Guilford Press.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2017). Self-Regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 119–151). Brill.
Harris, K. R., & McKeown, D. (2022). Overcoming barriers and paradigm wars: Powerful evidence-based writing instruction. Theory Into Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107334
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295-340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002295
Kellogg, R. T. (2018). Professional writing expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 413–430). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/9781316480748.023
Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). An aptitude-treatment interaction approach to writing to learn. Learning & Instruction, 18(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.004
Kiuhara, S. A., O'Neill, R. E., Hawken, L. S., & Graham, S. (2012). The effectiveness of teaching 10th-grade students STOP, AIMS, and DARE for planning and drafting persuasive text. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800305
Klein, P., Bildfell, A., Dombroski, J. D., Giese, C., Sha, K. W. Y., & Thompson, S. C. (2022). Self-regulation in early writing strategy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(2), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1919577
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford Press.
Koster, M., Bouwer, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Professional development of teachers in the implementation of a strategy-focused writing intervention program for elementary students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.002
Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
López, P., Torrance, M. & Fidalgo, R., (2019). The online management of writing processes and their contribution to text quality in upper-primary students. Psicothema: Revista de Psicología, 31(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.326
López, P., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Fidalgo, R. (2017). Effects of direct instruction and strategy modeling on upper-primary students’ writing development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article e1504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01054
MacArthur, C. A. (2017). Thoughts on what makes strategy instruction work and how it can be enhanced and extended. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 235–252). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_011
McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. University Press.
Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2002). What counts? The predictive powers of subject-matter knowledge, strategic processing, and interest in domain-specific performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220 97020 95995 06
Núñez, J. C., Rosario, P., Vallejo, G., & González-Pienda, J. A. (2013). A longitudinal assessment of the effectiveness of a school-based mentoring program in middle school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.10.002
Rietdijk, S., Janssen, T., van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2017) Improving writing in primary schools through a comprehensive writing program. The Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 173–225. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.04
Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Tillema, M., Van Steendam, E., & Raedts, M. (2011). Writing. In S. Graham, A. Bus, S. Major, & L. Swanson (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology: Application of educational psychology to learning and teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 189–228). American Psychological Society. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/13275-009
Rodríguez, L., Cueli, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2021a). Exploring the effects of strategy-focused instruction in writing skills of 4th grade students. Metacognition and Learning, 16(1), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09247-3
Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez, C., & Fidalgo, R. (2021b). Exploring the Short-Term and Maintained Effects of Strategic Instruction on the Writing of 4th Grade Students: Should Strategies be Focused on the Process?. Reading and Writing 34(7), 1769–1790, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10088-4
Rosário, P., Högemann, J., Núñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Cunha, J., Rodríguez, C., & Fuentes, S. (2019). The impact of three types of writing intervention on students’ writing quality. PloS One, 14(7), Article e0218099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0218099
Saddler, B., Asaro-Saddler, K., Moeyaert, M., & Cuccio-Slichko, J. (2019). Teaching summary writing to students with learning disabilities via strategy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(6), 572–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1600085
Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.340
Seoane, R., Jimenez, J. E., & Gutiérrez, M. (2021). Web-based training program for writing instruction: Preservice teachers’ beliefs profiles and their satisfaction. Psicothema, 33(4), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.19
Spencer, S. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1993). Validity and structure, coherence, and quality measures in writing. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862 96930 95478 11
Tracy, B., Reid, R., & Graham, S. (2009). Teaching young students strategies for planning and drafting stories: The impact of self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.5.323-33
Traga-Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2020). Integrating collaborative reasoning and strategy instruction to improve second graders’ opinion writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1650315
World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0121098902/50031-7
Derechos de autor 2024 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
