Inclusión y cambios en el aula vía adaptaciones instructivas
Abstract
While the trend toward a more inclusive education is growing, little information exists regarding teachers’ perceptions of within-class instructional adaptations. This article examines how teachers perceive such adaptations in terms of feasibility, effectiveness and desirability of implementation. Kindergarten (n = 16), elementary (n = 34), secondary (n = 26), and high school (n = 13) teachers rated the feasibility, effectiveness and desirability of 29 items on the Escala de Adaptaciones de la Enseñanza (ESAE-Form G) on a Likert-type scale. Results show that instructional adaptations have a moderate teachers’ acceptance and that although a majority of the teachers believe they are feasible and effective, only a minority perceive them as desirable. No statistically significant differences were found between kindergarten, elementary, and secondary teacher ratings. However some differences surfaced when comparing high school vs compulsary grades. Findings are discussed in light of needs for professional practice changes and sustantive reform in teacher training programs for diversity.Downloads
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.