How do teachers and students deal with conflict? An analysis of conflict resolution strategies and goals
Abstract
The public concern about school violence paints a threatening picture of students and overall relations at school, particularly in Secondary Education. However, from a constructive conflict resolution perspective as well as from student-voicing points of view, an analysis free of adult bias seems crucial to ensure the proper management of school conflicts. Hence, research has been conducted, applying situational questionnaires to 1768 pupils and 211 teachers from 16 Spanish Compulsory Secondary Education (ESO) schools in the Canary Islands and Asturias to better understand conflict resolution strategies and goals. Results showed that students are more frequently inclined to choose an Integrative and Discomfort-Avoiding coping style, advocating for Long-term goals, whereas their teachers primarily opted for coercive techniques (verbal and emotional abuse) and Short-term goals. The study concluded that students presented more constructive solutions to conflicts than teachers, underlining the need to educate teachers in these matters to improve their management of conflicts and become models for constructively addressing conflicts in the classroom.
Downloads
References
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., Köller, M. M., & Klusmann, U. (2020). Measuring Teachers’ Social-Emotional Competence: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892
Álvarez-García, D., Núñez-Pérez, J.C., & Dobarro-González, A. (2013). Cuestionarios para evaluar la violencia escolar en Educación Primaria y en Educación Secundaria: CUVE3-EP y CUVE3-ESO. Apuntes de Psicología, 31 (2), 191-202. https://www.apuntesdepsicologia.es/index.php/revista/article/view/322
Amnistía Internacional (2019). Hacer la vista… ¡gorda!: El acoso escolar en España, un asunto de derechos humanos. Amnistía Internacional España. https://doc.es.amnesty.org/ms-opac/recordmedia/1@000031105/object/40724/raw
Bayraktar, H.V., & Yilmaz, K.Ö. (2016). Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Conflict Resolution Skills in Terms of Different Variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(9), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1741
Bisquerra-Alzina, R. & García-Navarro, E. (2018). La educación emocional requiere formación del profesorado. Participación educativa, 5(8), 13-28. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27411927006
Buendía-Eisman, L., Expósito-López, J., Aguadez-Ramírez, E.M., & Sánchez- Núñez, C.A. (2015). Análisis de la convivencia escolar en las aulas multiculturales de Educación Secundaria. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 33(2), 303-319. http:/dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.2.211491
Caba-Collado, M. Á., & López-Atxurra, R. (2013). La agresión entre iguales en la era digital: estrategias de afrontamiento de los estudiantes del último ciclo de Primaria y del primero de Secundaria. Revista de Educación, 362, 247-272. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-160
Ceballos-Vacas, E.M., & Trujillo-González, E. (2021b). Dificultades y apoyos emocionales del alumnado migrante: un estudio de caso en un instituto multicultural. Aula abierta, 50(4), 767-776. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.50.4.2021.767-776
Ceballos-Vacas, E.M., Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rodríguez-Hernández, J.A. (2021a). Fundamentación, descripción y análisis del cuestionario situacional de estrategias y metas de resolución de conflictos escolares. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 37, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2020.05
Ceballos-Vacas, E.M., Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., Correa-Piñero, A. y Rodríguez-Hernández, J.A. (2016). La evaluación situacional de los conflictos: Construcción y análisis del cuestionario de estrategias y metas de resolución de conflictos escolares. Educación XX1, 19(2), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.13943
Ceballos-Vacas, E. M., Correa-Rodríguez, M.T., Correa-Piñero, A.D., Rodríguez-Hernández, J.A., Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Vega-Navarro, A. (2012). La voz del alumnado en el conflicto escolar. Revista de Educación, 359, 554-579. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-359-107
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Córdoba-Alcaide, F., Rey-Alamillo, R., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2016). Conflictividad: un estudio sobre problemas de convivencia escolar en Educación Primaria. Temas de Educación, 22(2), 189-205. https://revistas.userena.cl/index.php/teduacion/article/view/806
Díaz-Better, S.P. (2016). Hacia una convivencia pacífica en la escuela: Percepciones sobre violencia escolar y tramitación de conflictos. Revista Educación y Ciudad, 31, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.36737/01230425.v.n31.2016.1607
Domínguez-Alonso, J., Álvarez-Roales, E., & Vázquez-Varela, E. (2017). Dimensiones predictivas del constructo violencia escolar en la educación secundaria obligatoria. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(2), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.35.2.259471
Elizalde-Castillo, A. (2010). Descriptive study about bullying’ coping strategies among Mexican teachers. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(20), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i20.1411
Feldman, R.S. (2020). Development across the life span (9thed). Pearson.
Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Ryan, T., & Barnes, M. (2021). The impact of student perception surveys on teachers’ practice: Teacher resistance and struggle in student voice-based assessment initiatives of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103436
Galindo-Domínguez, H., Sainz-de la Maza, M., & Losada-Iglesias, D. (2022). La inteligencia emocional en el desarrollo de estilos de resolución de conflictos en futuros educadores. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 25(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.528721
García-Moya, I., Moreno, C., & Brooks, F.M. (2019). The ‘balancing acts’ of building positive relationships with students: Secondary school teachers' perspectives in England and Spain. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102883
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Grau-Vidal, R., García-Raga, L., & López-Martín, R. (2016). Towards school transformation. Evaluation of a coexistence program from the voice of students and teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(2), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.7.177
Hakvoort, I., Lindahl, J., & Lundström, A. (2019). A bibliometric review of approaches to address conflicts in schools: Exploring the intellectual base. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 37(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21266
Hernández-Prados, M.Á., Penalva-López, A., & Guerrero-Romera, C. (2020). Profesorado y convivencia escolar: necesidades formativas. Magister, 32(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.17811/msg.32.1.2020.23-32
Jurado de los Santos, P., Lafuente Carrasco, Á., & Justiniano Domínguez, M.D. (2020). Conductas disruptivas en Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: análisis de factores intervinientes. Contextos Educativos. Revista De Educación, 25, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3827
Kirk, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164496056005002
Larsson, K., Hakvoort, I., & Lundström, A. (2022). How teachers understand and strategize about emerging conflicts. British Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 785-802. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3794
Laursen, B., Finkelstein, B.D., & Betts, N.T. (2001). A developmental meta-analysis of peer conflict resolution. Developmental Review, 21(4), 423-449. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0531
Levi-Keren, M., Godeano-Barr, S., & Levinas, S. (2022). Mind the conflict: Empathy when coping with conflicts in the education sphere. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2013395. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2013395
Llorent-García, V.J., Farrington, D.P., & Zych, I. (2021). School climate and its relations with social and emotional competencies, bullying and cyberbullying in Secondary Education. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 26, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2020.11.002
Maeng, J.L., Malone, M., & Cornell, D. (2020). Student threats of violence against teachers: Prevalence and outcomes using a threat assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102934
Malm, B. & Löfgren, H. (2006). Teacher competence and students' conflict handling strategies. Research in Education, 76(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.76.6
Manesis, N., Vlachou, E., & Mitropoulou, F. (2019). Greek teachers’ perceptions about the types and the consequences of conflicts within school context. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 781-799. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.781
Meeus, W. (2021). Rules of intra-individual development in adolescence: A framework. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1872537
Merma-Molina, G., Ávalos-Ramos, M.A., & Martínez-Ruiz, M.Á. (2019). ¿Por qué no son eficaces los planes de convivencia escolar en España? Revista de Investigación Educativa, 37(2), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.37.2.313561
Ministerio de Educación (2010). Estudio estatal sobre la convivencia escolar en la educación secundaria obligatoria. Observatorio Convivencia escolar. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/estudio-estatal-sobre-la-convivencia-escolar-en-la-educacion-secundaria-obligatoria/educacion-secundaria-socializacion/13567
Murphy, H. R., Tubritt, J., & O’Higgins-Norman, J. (2018). The Role of Empathy in Preparing Teachers to Tackle Bullying. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.1.261
Nieto-Campos, B., Portela-Pino, I., Álvarez-García, D., & Domínguez-Alonso, J. (2022). Violencia ejercida y sufrida por el profesorado en su labor docente. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 40(2), 457-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.464211
Obraztsova, O. (2018). Teacher’s beliefs on conflict and conflict resolution. Education in the North, 25(1-2). https://doi.org/10.26203/ssmn-3h47
Olmos-Migueláñez, S., Torrecilla-Sánchez, E.M., & Rodríguez Conde, M.J. (2017). Conflict resolution professional skills: Efficacy of a program for competence improvement. Revista española de orientación y psicopedagogía, 28(3), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.28.num.3.2017.21617
OECD (2012). Redefining “Urban”: A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/regional/redefiningurbananewwaytomeasuremetropolitanareas.htm
OECD (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
Parker, C., & Bickmore, K. (2020). Classroom peace circles: Teachers’ professional learning and implementation of restorative dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103-129. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103129
Pérez, F., Serrano, L. & Uriel, E. (Dirs.) (2019). Diferencias educativas regionales, 2000-2016: condicionantes y resultados. Fundación BBVA.
Pérez-Fuentes, M.C., Gázquez-Linares, J.J., Fernández-Baena, R.J., & Molero-Jurado, M.M. (2011). Análisis de las publicaciones sobre convivencia escolar en una muestra de revistas de educación en la última década. Aula abierta, 39(2), 81-90. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/AA/issue/view/1038/142
Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rodrigo-López, M.J. (2011). El “nido repleto”: la resolución de conflictos familiares cuando los hijos mayores se quedan en el hogar. Cultura y Educación, 23(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564011794728551
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school. Giving pupils a voice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2014). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: ‘Carving a new order of experience'. In Nogel Norris (Ed.), Curriculum and the Teacher (pp. 183-197). Routledge.
Santamaría-Villar, M. B, Gilar-Corbi R., Pozo-Rico, T., & Castejón, J.L. (2021). Teaching Socio-Emotional Competencies Among Primary School Students: Improving Conflict Resolution and Promoting Democratic Co-existence in Schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 659348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659348
Sequera-Molina, L. (2020). Memoria estatal 2019-2020. El defensor del profesor. ANPE. https://documentos.anpe.es/defensor/Informe_defensor_2019_2020.pdf
Tamm, A., Tulviste, T., & Urm, A. (2018). Resolving conflicts with friends: Adolescents' strategies and reasons behind these strategies. Journal of Adolescence, 64, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564013806309037
UNESCO (2018). School violence and bullying. Global status and trends, drivers and consequences. https://healtheducationresources.unesco.org/library/documents/school-violence-and-bullying-global-status-and-trends-drivers-and-consequences
Valdés-Cuervo, A.A., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Carlos-Martínez, E.A. (2018). The role of teaching practices in the prevention of school violence among peers. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2017.05.006
Valente, S., & Lourenço, A.A. (2020). Conflict in the classroom: How teachers’ emotional intelligence influences conflict management. Frontiers in Education, 5(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00005
Yang, Y., Quin, L., & Ling, N. (2021). School Violence and Teacher Professional Engagement: A Cross-National Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628809
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
