Educating the Youth to Develop Life Purpose: An Eco-systemic Approach
Abstract
Life purpose is an internal representation of a personally meaningful, prosocial contribution the person intends to engage with over their life span. Individuals’ purposes interact within a social-cultural eco-system by directing individuals’ perceptions toward situational resources (including others’ purposes) that can help enact their purpose. Education can encourage students to explore their purposes within and beyond the classroom. This paper describes a case study of a class offered six times using three different ecological “niches”: (1) conceptual understanding eco-niche focused on learning the concept and its relationships to other concepts; (2) resources-application eco-niche focused on reconceiving aspects of the concept as intellectual instruments to apply to real-life cases, including students themselves; (3) iterative practice eco-niche focused on implementing purposes within various contexts and interpreting feedback from those contexts. Using a feedback loop model to interpret how each eco-niche favours a different starting point and development trajectory through Damon’s (2008) four dimensions of purpose, this eco-niche comparison (a) emphasizes how “high impact” educational experiences focus not on the students’ improvements but rather on the improvements of communities as a result of students' enacting their purpose through their contributions, and (b) offers insights for teachers to infuse purpose development opportunities in their classes.
Downloads
References
Bronk, K. C. (2012). A grounded theory of noble youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1). 78-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411412958
Bronk, K. C., Hill, P. L., Lapsley, D. K., Talib, T. L., & Finch, H. (2009). Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 500-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271439
Bronson, P. (2005). What should I do with my life? Ballantine.
Burrow, A. L., Hill, P. L., & Sumner, R. (2016). Leveling mountains: Purpose attenuates links between perceptions of effort and steepness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(1), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215615404
Burrow, A. L., & Spreng, R. N. (2016). Waiting with purpose: A reliable but small association between purpose in life and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 187-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.010
Colucci-Gray, L., Camino, E., Barbiero, G., & Gray, D. (2005). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90(2), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20109
Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. Free Press.
Damon, W. (2009). The why question: Teachers can instill a sense of purpose. Education Next, 9(3), 84.
Dik, B. J., Steger, M. F., Gibson, A., & Peisner, W. (2011). Make your work matter: Development and pilot evaluation of a purpose-centered career education intervention. New Directions for Youth Development, 132, 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.428
Etzioni, A. (2004). The common good. Polity.
Folgueiras, P., & Palou, B. (2018). An exploratory study of aspirations for change and their effect on purpose among Catalan university students. Journal of Moral Education, 47(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1433643
Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). Perceptual learning and development: An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford University Press.
Heft, H. (2013). An ecological approach to psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032928
Hill, P. L., Burrow, A. L., Brandenberger, J. W., Lapsley, D. K., & Quaranto, J. C. (2010). Collegiate purpose orientations and well-being in adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.12.001
Hurst, A. (2014). The purpose economy. Elevate.
Kiang, L. (2011). Deriving daily purpose through daily events and role fulfillment among Asian American youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 185-198.
Lerner, R. M. (1982). Children and adolescents as producers of their own development. Developmental Review, 2, 342-370.
Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Quinn, B., & Moran, S. (2013). Adolescent purpose development: Exploring empathy, discovering roles, shifting priorities, and creating pathways. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12051
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual series in educational innovation. Prentice Hall.
Moran, S. (2009). Purpose: Giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130903358501
Moran, S. (2010). Changing the world: Tolerance and creativity aspirations among American youth. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/135981392010.525342
Moran, S. (2016). What do teachers think about youth purpose? The Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1226556
Moran, S. (2017). Youth purpose worldwide: A tapestry of possibilities. Journal of Moral Education, 46(3), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1355297
Moran, S. (2018). Purpose-in-action education. Journal of Moral Education, 47(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1444001
Moran, S. (2019a). Is personal life purpose replacing shared worldview as youths increasingly individuate? Implications for educators. International
Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(5), 8-23. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijler.18.5.2
Moran, S. (2019b). Youth life purpose: Evaluating service-learning via development of lifelong ‘radar’ for community contribution. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service-learning in European higher education (pp. 51-66). Routledge.
Moran, S. (2020a). How practicing our purpose aims contributes to a cultural common good, and vice versa. In P. Hill & A. Burrow (Eds.), The ecology of purposeful living across the lifespan (pp. 199-232). Springer.
Moran, S. (2020b). Life purpose in youth: Turning potential into a lifelong pursuit of prosocial contribution. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(1), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219897844
Moran, S., Bundick, M. J., Malin, H., & Reilly, T. S. (2012). How supportive of their specific purposes do youth believe their family and friends are?
Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(3), 348-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558412457816
Moran, S., & Garcia, R. L. (2019). How does US college students’ sense of life purpose relate to their emotional expectations of being a volunteer in the community as part of a service-learning course? Bordón, Journal of Education, 71(3), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2019.70425
Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 11-25). Free Association Books.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188
Pizzolato, J., Brown, E. L., & Kanny, M. A. (2011). Purpose plus: Supporting youth purpose, control, and academic achievement. New Directions for Youth Development, 132, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.429
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262009
Schon, D. A. (1995). Knowing in action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673
Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79
Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B. K., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505-531. https://doi.org/10.17763/HAER.84.4.BRR34733723J648U
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M., Paunesku, D., Walton, G., Spitzer, B., D’Mello, S., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 559-580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037637
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
