Analysis of the evaluation of emotional education and motivation programs in Secondary Education
Abstract
Motivation is a key aspect in education due to its influence on academic performance, and intervention programs are a useful resource to contribute to its improvement. However, selecting the right programme with quality guarantees is not always a simple task. One way to have a certain guarantee is by choosing those programs that have not only been evaluated, but for which there is also evidence that the evaluation has been performed correctly
The present work aims to analyse the evaluation processes and results of different motivational intervention programs addressed to Secondary students from the results of their evaluation results. In order to achieve this goal, a theoretical approach to program evaluation and meta-evaluation is made and a review of the academic literature from which evaluations of motivational intervention programs are selected and compared. Finally, a meta-evaluation is performed through the application of standards.
The results show that evaluations are generally conducted internally and in a summative manner, focusing on the results of implementation rather than on the process.
Downloads
References
Álvarez Rojo, V., García, E. Gil, J., Martínez, P., Romero, S., y Rodríguez, J. (2002). Diseño y evaluación de programas. Madrid: EOS
Álvarez Rojo, V., y Hernández Fernández, J. (1998). El modelo de intervención por programas. Aportaciones para una revisión. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 16(2), 79-123.
Anaya D. (2014). Bases del aprendizaje y educación. Madrid: UNED
Barati, M., Joo, S. B., y Aria, A. M. (2018). Studying the impact of metacognitive beliefs and self-regulatory strategies on students’ educational motivation. Iranian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 6(1).
Burunat, E. (2004). El desarrollo del sustrato neurobiológico de la motivación y emoción en la adolescencia: ¿un nuevo período crítico? Infancia y aprendizaje, 27(1), 87-104.
De Caso, A. M. (2014). Pautas para el estudio de la motivación académica. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD de Psicología., 6(1), 213-220, doi: 10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v6.736
Expósito, J., Olmedo, E., y Cano, A. F. (2004). Patrones metodológicos en la investigación española sobre evaluación de programas educativos. RELIEVE, 10(2), 185-209, doi: 10.7203/relieve.10.2.4319
Frye, A. W., y Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Medical teacher, 34(5), e288-e299, doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
García, F. (2008). Motivar para el aprendizaje desde la acción orientadora. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: Madrid.
Järvelä, S. (2001). Shifting research on motivation and cognition to an integrated approach on learning and motivation in context. En Volet, S., y Järvelä, S. (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications. London: Pergamon.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Lange, J., Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., van Kleef, G. A., y Fischer, A. H. (2020). Toward an Integrative Psychometric Model of Emotions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 444-468.
LaVelle, J.M. (2019). Educating Evaluators 1976–2017: An Expanded Analysis of University-Based Evaluation Education Programs. American Journal of Evaluation 20(10), 1-16, doi: 10.1177/1098214019860914
López, J. G. (2006). Aportaciones de la teoría de las atribuciones causales a la comprensión de la motivación para el rendimiento escolar. Ensayos: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete (21), 217–232.
Manzano, N. (2000). Indicadores para evaluar programas de orientación educativa. Revista de Orientación Educativa y Psicopedagógica, (19), 51-75.
Martínez Mediano, C. (2017). Evaluación de programas. Madrid: UNED.
Méndez Pineda, J. M. (2018). Evaluación externa del programa escuelas de tiempo completo, 2016. Recuperado de: http://www.seslp.gob.mx/pdf/informe_evaluacionExterna.pdf
Mirete Ruiz, A. B., Soro Bernal, M., y Maquilón Sánchez, J. J. (2015). El fracaso escolar y los enfoques de aprendizaje: medidas para la inclusión educativa. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, 18(3), 183-196. doi: 10.6018/reifop.18.3.239021
OMS (2020). Adolescence health. Recuperado de: https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_1
Pérez Juste, R. (1995) Metodología para la evaluación de programas educativos. En A. Medina y L.M. Villar. Evaluación de Programas Educativos, Centros y Profesores. Madrid: Universitas
Pérez Juste (2000). La evaluación de programas educativos: conceptos básicos, planteamientos generales y problemática. Revista de investigación educativa, 18(2), 261-287.
Pérez Juste (2006). Evaluación de programas educativos. Madrid: La muralla.
Pérez-González, J. C. (2008). Propuesta para la evaluación de programas de educación socioemocional. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 6(15), 523-546.
Pulido Acosta, F., y Herrera Clavero, F. (2017). La influencia de las emociones sobre el rendimiento académico. Ciencias Psicológicas, 11(1), 29-39.
Rinaudo, M. C., Chiecher, A., y Donolo, D. (2003). Motivación y uso de estrategias en alumnos universitarios. Su evaluación a partir del Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire. Anales de psicología, 19(1), 107-119.
Sánchez Calleja, L., García Jiménez, E., y Rodríguez Gómez, G. (2016). Evaluación del diseño del programa AedEM de Educación Emocional para Educación Secundaria. Relieve: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 22 (2), 1-25, doi: 10.7203/relieve.22.2.9422
Samson, B., y Solabarrieta, J. (2018). Improving evaluation of students: a meta-evaluation study on cce from the perspective of students evaluation standards. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 8(2).
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., y Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223-228.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. En Tyler, R. W., Gagné, R., W., y Scriven, M. (Eds.). Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago. Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (2013). Key evaluation checklist (KEC). Recuperadon de: www.michaelscriven.info/images/KEC_3.22.2013.pdf
Stake, R.E. (1975) To Evaluate an Arts Program. En R.E. Stake (Ed.), Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. En Annual meeting of the American Association of School Administrators.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1987). Professional standards for assuring the quality of educational program and personnel evaluations. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 125-143.
Tejedor, F. J. (2000). El diseño y los diseños en la evaluación de programas. Revista de investigación educativa, 18(2), 319-339.
Torrijos, P., Torrecilla, E. M., y Rodríguez, M. J. (2018). Experimental evaluation of emotional development programmes for teachers in Secondary Education. anales de psicología, 34(1), 68-76, doi: 10.6018/analesps.34.1.273451
Yarbrough, D.B., Shula, L.M., Hopson, R.K., & Caruthers, F.A. (2010). The Program Evaluation Standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd. ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
