Teacher evaluation as a direct path towards the improvement of educational quality
Abstract
Teacher evaluation is a very relevant area of research in education. It offers a great potential to strengthen features of educational quality whether it is carried out while being adequately contextualized, by following the principles and characteristics of the evaluation defended in numerous scientific publications of main international experts. In order to base the correct evaluation, important aspects such as the model approaches, the scopes and contents, the objectives and decisions, the sources and methodologies and the regulations are analysed. In addition, the important role of teachers in the area of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education (MRDE) belonging to Spanish universities, as well as the large quantity and quality of publications on this subject in scientific journals promoted by his research association AIDIPE.
Downloads
References
Abrami, P. C., (1989). How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching. Research in Higher Education, 30(2), 221-227. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00992718
Airasian, P. W., & Gulickson, A., (1994). Examination of teacher self-assessment. Jour¬nal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 195-203. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ492227
Aliaga, F. (2014). Editorial. Calidad y evaluación de las revistas científicas de educación. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 32(1), 11-12. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=283330505001
Ariza, T., & Quevedo-Blasco, R. (2013). Análisis bibliométrico de la Revista de Inves¬tigación Educativa (2000-2012). Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(1), 31-52. Aliaga, F. (2014). Editorial. Calidad y evaluación de las revistas científicas de educación. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 32(1), 11-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.31.1.160321
Bacharach, S. B., Conley, S., & Shedd, J. B. (1986). Beyond career ladders: structuring teacher career development systems. Teacher College Record, 87(4), 563-574.
Bacharach, S. B., Conley, S., & Shedd, J. B. (1990). Evaluating teachers for career awards and merit pay. En J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp.133-146). California: Sage Publications.
Barber, L. W. (1990). Self-assessment. En J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp.216-228). California: Sage Publications.
Barr, A. S., & Emans, L. M. (1930). What qualities are prerequisite to success in teaching? Nation’s Schools, 6, 60-64.
Boyan, N., & Copeland, W. (1978). Instructional supervision training program. Columbus, Oh: Charles E. Merril.
Carroll, J. G. (1981). Faculty self-assessment. En J. Millman (Ed.). Handbook of Teacher Evaluation (pp.180-200). Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage Publications.
De La Orden, A. (1990). Evaluación, Selección y Promoción del profesorado universitario. Revista Complutense de Educación, 1(1), 11-29. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/RCED9090130011A/18245
De Miguel, M. (1991). Criterios para la evaluación del profesorado universitario. Oviedo: KRK.
De Miguel, M. (1998). La evaluación del profesorado universitario. Criterios y propuestas para mejorar la función docente. Revista de Educación, 315, 67-84. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=19192
Denham, C. H. (1987). A perspective on the major purposes and basic procedures for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 29-32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00143277
Dwyer, C. A. (1994). Criteria for performance-based teacher assessments: Validity, standards, and issues. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 135-150. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00972260
Epstein, J. L. (1985). A question of merit: Principals´ and parents´ evaluations of teachers. Educational Researchers, 14(7), 3-8. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189X014007003
Escudero, T. (1980). ¿Se pueden evaluar los centros educativos y sus profesores? Zaragoza: ICE Universidad de Zaragoza
Escudero, T. (1989). Aproximación pragmática a la evaluación de la universidad. Revista Investigación Educativa, 7(13), 93-112. http://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/136611/124211
Escudero, T. (1999). Los estudiantes como evaluadores de la docencia y de los profesores: nuestra experiencia. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 34, 69-86. http://www3.uva.es/aufop/publica/revaufop/rev99-34.htm#Escudero
Escudero, T (2000). La voz de los estudiantes: un delicado instrumento de evaluación, Cuadernos IRC, 5, 31-38.
Escudero, T. (2003). Desde los tests hasta la investigación evaluativa actual. Un siglo, el XX, de intenso desarrollo de la evaluación en educación. RELIEVE- Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 9(1), 1-33 https://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v9n1/RELIEVEv9n1_1.htm
Escudero, T. (2005). Selección, evaluación y carrera profesional. Ponencia presentada en eI foro ANECA “El profesorado universitario”, Madrid: ANECA
Escudero, T. (2005-2006). Claves identificativas de la investigación evaluativa: Análisis desde la práctica. Contextos Educativos, 8-9, 179-199. https://publica-ciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/contextos/article/view/563
Escudero, T. (2006a). Evaluación y mejora de la calidad en educación, en T. Escudero & A.D. Correa (Ed.). Investigación en innovación educativa algunos ámbitos relevantes (pp. 269-325). Madrid: Editorial La Muralla.
Escudero, T. (junio, 2006b). La evaluación del profesorado en España en la última década: Nuevos retos. Ponencia presentada en Encuentro 10 años de evaluación de la calidad de las universidades españolas: 1996-2006 Resultados y objetivos (ANECA-Universidad de Zaragoza), Jaca.
Escudero, T. (2010). Fundamentos de la investigación evaluativa en educación, en S. Nieto (Ed.). Principios, Métodos y Técnicas esenciales para la Investigación Educativa (pp. 497-523), Madrid: Dykinson.
Escudero, T. (2011). La construcción de la investigación evaluativa. El aporte desde la educación. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza
Escudero, T. (2016a). La investigación evaluativa en el siglo XXI: un instrumento para el desarrollo educativo y social cada vez más relevante. RELIEVE- Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 22(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8164
Escudero, T. (2016b). Evaluar al Profesorado. Heraldo de Aragón. https://www.heraldo.es/noticias/heraldo-premium/tribuna/2016/05/22/evaluar-profesorado-873228-2091031.html
Escudero, T. (2018). La selección y promoción del profesorado universitario Heraldo de Aragón, https://www.heraldo.es/index.php/mod.global/mem.buscadorHemeroteca
Escudero, T., Pino, J. L., & Rodríguez, C. (2010). Evaluación del profesorado universitario para incentivos individuales: revisión metaevaluativa. Revista de Educación, 351, 513-537. https://www.mecd.gob.es/revista-de-educacion/numeros-revista-educacion/numeros-anteriores/2010/re351/re351_21.html
Fernández, M. M., Navarro, C., Higuera, C., & Martínez, E. (1993). Encuesta al profesorado de primaria y secundaria de la enseñanza pública. Madrid: CIDE.
Frase, L. E., & Streshly, W. (1994). Lack of accuracy, feedback, and, commitment in teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(1), 47-57. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00972709
García Ramos, J. M. (1997). Valoración de la competencia docente del profesor universitario. Revista Complutense de Educación, 8(2), 81-108. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/RCED9797220081A
Gellman, E. S., & Berkowitz, M. (1992). Factors perceived as important in teacher evaluation, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 38(3), 219-234.
Genova, W. J. (1976). Mutual Benefit Evaluation of Faculty and Administrators in Higher Education. Cambridge, Ma: Ballinger
Glass, G. V. (1990). Using student test scores to evaluate teachers, en J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 229-240), California: Sage Publications.
González, M. C. (1992). La evaluación de profesores, Proyecto de Investigación. Madrid: CIDE.
Haney, W. (1990). Preservice evaluation of teachers, en J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp.46-61). California: Sage Publications.
Harris, B. M. (1986). Developmental teacher evaluation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Hatry, H. P., & Greiner, J. M. (1985). Issues and case studies in teacher incentive plans. Washington, D.C: The Urban Institute Press.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. California: Sage Publications
Jornet, J. M. (2017). Editorial. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(2), 299-306. http://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/299021/214071
Klenowski, V. (2007). Desarrollo del Portafolios para el Aprendizaje y la Evaluación. Madrid: Narcea.
Malen, B. (1999). On rewards, punishments, and possibilities: Teacher compensation as an instrument for education reform. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(4), 387-394. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008020029508
Marczely, B. (1992). Teacher evaluation: Research versus practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5(3), 279-290. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00125242
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1991). The multidimensionality of students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: The generality of factor structures across academic discipline, instructor level and course level. Teacher & Teacher Education, 7(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(91)90054-S
Mateo, J. (1993). La evaluación del profesorado de secundaria, Ponencia en el Seminario sobre las re-formas educativas actuales en España. Su evaluación: metodología y resultados. Madrid: CIDE-UNED-CDLM
Mateo, J., Escudero, T., De Miguel, M., Mora, J. G., & Rodríguez, S. (1995). La evaluación del profesorado de secundaria: la opinión del profesor, Proyecto de Investigación del CIDE, Memoria final. Barcelona: CIDE.
Mateo, J. Escudero, T., De Miguel, M., Mora, J. G., & Rodríguez, S. (1996a). La evaluación del profesorado de secundaria. Barcelona: Cedecs Editorial
Mateo, J. Escudero, T., De Miguel, M., Mora, J. G., & Rodríguez, S. (1996b). La evaluación del profesorado. Un tema a debate. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 14(2), 73-93. http://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/141222/127072
Mclaughlin, M. W. (1990). Embracing contraries: Implementing and sustaining tea¬cher evaluation, en J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Hadbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp: 403-415), California: Sage Publications.
Mehrens, W. A. (1990). Combining evaluation data from multiple sources, en J. Millman, & L. Darling-Hammond, (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp.322-334), California: Sage Publications
Muñoz Cantero, J.M., Ríos De Deus, M.P., & Abalde, E. (2002). Evaluación Docente vs. Evaluación de la Calidad. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa (RELIEVE), 8(2), 103-134. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.8.2.4362
Muñoz Cantero, J. M, & Espiñeira, E. M. (2010). Plan de Mejoras fruto de la evaluación de la calidad de la atención a la diversidad en un centro educativo. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 28(2), 245-264. http://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/111931/121571
Murphy, J. (1987). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive framework for supervisor. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(2), 157-180. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00128892
Natriello, G. (1990). Intended and unintendend consequences: Purposes and effects of teacher evaluation. En J. Millman, & L. Darling-Hammond, (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 35-45). California: Sage Publications
Nevo, D. (1994). How can teachers benefit from teacher evaluation? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 109-117. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00972258
Palacián, E., & Blanco, F. (1993). Profesión docente, reforma y transferencias: Visión del profesorado. Zaragoza: ICE-Universidad de Zaragoza.
Pérez Juste, R., Cristobal, M., & Martínez, B. (Coords.). (1995). Evaluación de Profesores y Reformas Educativas. Madrid: UNED.
Peterson, K. D. (1990). Assistance and assessment for beginning teachers. En J. Millman, & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp.104-115). California: Sage Publications
Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher Evaluation. A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. California: Corwin Press
Peterson, K. D., Stevens, D., & Mack, C. (2001). Presenting complex teacher evaluation data: Adventages of dossier organization techniques over portfolios. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(2), 121-133. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1012443829862
Popham, W. J. (1973). Evaluating instruction. Englewood-NJ: Prentice-Hall
Popham, W. J. (1987). The shortcomings of champagne teacher evaluations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 25-28. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00143276
Riegle, R. P. (1987). Conceptions of faculty development. Educational Theory, 37, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1987.00053.x
Rodriguez Espinar, S. (1997). La evaluación institucional universitaria. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 15(2), 179-216. http://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/122631
Rodriguez Espinar, S. (2003). Evaluación comprensiva del profesorado universitario. Educación Médica, 6(3), 25-30. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-18132003000300013
Rosenshine, B. (1970). The stability of teacher effects upon student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 40, 647-662. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1169461
Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation, en J. Millman (Ed.), Hankbook on teacher evaluation (pp. 244-271), Beverly Hills-California: Sage Publications
Scriven, M. (1988). Duty-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evalua¬tion in Education, 1(4), 319-334. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00124098
Scriven, M. (1990). Teacher selection. En J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 76-103), Newbury Park-California: Sage Publications, Newbury Park
Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of the teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 151-184. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00972261
Scriven, M., (1995). A unified theory approach to teacher evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21(2), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(95)00009-J
Schalock, M. D., Cowart, B., & Staebler, B. (1993). Teacher productivity revisited: Definition, theory, measurement and application. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 179-196. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00995302
Seldin, P. (1997). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and pro-motion/tenure decisions. Bolton, Ma.: Anker.
Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1997). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston, Ma.: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1985). Performance assessment for teacher development, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737007001085
Stodolsky, S. S. (1990). Classroom Observation. En J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 175-190), Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1991). An introduction to the Center for Research on Education Accountability and Teacher Evaluation (CREATE). Journal for Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 85-94.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Brethower, D. M. (1987). Improving personnel evaluations through pro-fessional standards. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 125-155. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00128891
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfiel, A. J. (1987). Evaluación sistemática. Guía teórica y práctica. Madrid: Ediciones Paidós/M.E.C.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Sanders, J. R. (1990). Using the Personnel Evaluation Standards to Improve Teacher Evaluation, en J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 416-428), Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications
Tejedor, F. J. (2003). Un modelo de evaluación del profesorado universitario, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 21(1), 157-182. http://revistas.um.es/rie/article/view/99151
Tejedor, F.J., & Jornet, J. M. (2008). La evaluación del profesorado universitario en España. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 10(Especial), 1-29. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412008000300005
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143-178. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054002143
Villa, A. (1985). La evaluación del profesor: perspectivas y resultados. Revista de Educación, 277, 55-93. https://www.mecd.gob.es/revista-de-educacion/numeros-revista-educacion/numeros-anteriores/1985/re277/re277_04.html
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation. Methods for studying programs and policies. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Wilson, B., & Wood, J.A. (1996). Teacher evaluation: A national dilemma. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(1), 75-82. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00139470
Wise, A., Darling-Hammond, L. McLaughlin, M., & Bernstein, H. (1985). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Elementary School Journal, 86, 61-121. https://doi.org/10.1086/461437
Wolfe, P. (1987). What the «seven-step lesson plan» isn’t. Educational Leadership, 45(5), 70-71. http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198702_wolfe.pdf
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
