Assessment about a proyect in entrepreneurship education in the ESO. The student’s view
Supporting Agencies
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- dentro del Plan Estatal de Excelencia de Proyectos I D.
Abstract
It is a mixed and descriptive research, having as aims knowing the effect on the enterprise potential of students who have participated in the programs ÍCARO and EJE, and understanding how having these experiences has helped the personal indicators development of the enterprise potential. Quantitatively, 182 students participated between control and experimental group, answering the ATE test. Qualitatively, the ten students who increased their enterprise potential more and the ten who got the lowest marks selected. The effect of the programs was evaluated via the analysis of the variance with a factorial design 2x2 with repeated measures and the data were analyzed through a mixed ANOVA. The information of the interviews was analyzed via a semiotic and narrative analysis. According to quantitative data, a relevant effect on enterprise potential does not exist and the interviews reveal that both programs seem not to be configured suitably to have an impact on the personal indicators of the enterprise potential.
Downloads
References
Athayde, R. (2009). Measuring enterprise potential in young people. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 481-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00300.x
Athayde, R. (2012). The impact of enterprise education on attitudes to enterprise in young people: an evaluation study. Education +Training, 54(8/9), 709-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400911211274846
Ato, M., López, J. & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Aviram, R. & Yonah, Y. (2004). Flexible control: Towards a conception of personal autonomy for postmodern education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(1), 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00045.x
Balluerka, N. & Vergara, A. J. (2002). Diseños de investigación experimental en psicología. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M. & Tindall, C. (2004). Métodos Cualitativos en Psicología: Una Guía Para la Investigación. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Bericat, E. (1998). La integración de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la investigación social. Barcelona: Ariel.
Bernal, A. & Cárdenas, A. (2014). La formación de emprendedores en la escuela y su repercusión en el ámbito personal. Una investigación narrativa centrada en el Programa EME. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 72(257), 124-143.
Bisquerra, R. (2014). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Madrid: La Muralla.
Bolívar, A. (2010). ¿Cómo un liderazgo pedagógico y distribuido mejora los logros académicos? Revisión de la investigación y propuesta. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 3(5), 79-106.
Casanova, A.M. (2012). La evaluación de las competencias básicas. Madrid: La Muralla. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage.
Denzin, N.K. (1970). Sociological Methods: a Source Book. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002
Diego, I. & Vega, J. A. (2015). La educación para el emprendimiento en el sistema educativo español. Año 2015. Estudio rediE. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. EACEA. (2012). Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe. National Strategies, Curri- cula and Learning Outcomes. Bruselas: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executiva Agency. http://dx.doi.org/10.2797/80384
EACEA. (2016). Entrepreneurship in Europe Eurydice Report Education at School. Luxem- bourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2797/301610
Edwards. L.J. & Muir, E.J. (2012). Evaluating enterprise education: why do it?. Education + Training, 54 (4), 278-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400911211236136
Fillis, I. & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(1), 49-81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218495810000501
Flick, U. (2012). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2014). Informe GEM España 2014. Santander: Uni- versidad de Cantabria.
Guba, E.G. (1989). Criterios de credibilidad en la investigación naturalista. En J. Gimeno Sacristán & A. Pérez Gómez (Eds.), La enseñanza: su teoría y su práctica (3ª ed., pp. 148-165). Madrid: Akal.
Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H. (2007). Decisiones inteligentes: guía práctica para tomar mejores decisiones. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.
Helwig, C.C. (2006). The development of personal autonomy throughout cultures. Cognitive Development, 21, 458-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.06.009
Johnson, B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33(7), 14-26.
Katz, J.M. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneur- ship education 1876–1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (2), 283-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00098-8
Kvale, S. (2011). Las entrevistas de investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
León, O.G. & Montero, I. (2003). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Lepoutre J., Van den Berghe W., Tilleuil O. & Crijns H. (2011). A new approach to testing the effects of entrepreneurship education among secondary school pupils. En: M. Raposo, D. Smallbone, K. Balaton & L. Hortoványi (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, Growth and Economic Development. Frontiers in Europeaen Entrepreneuship Research (pp.94-117). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Ley Orgánica 5/2002, de 19 de junio, de las Cualificaciones y de la Formación Profe- sional. BOE 147 de junio.
Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE 106 de mayo.
Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa. BOE 295 de diciembre.
López, O. & Navarro, J. (2010). Creatividad e inteligencia: un estudio en Educación Primaria. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 28(2), 283-296.
Marina, J.A. (2013). Talento, Motivación e Inteligencia. Las claves para una educación eficaz. Barcelona: Ariel.
Martin, B.C., McNally, J.J. & Michael J.K. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outco- mes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211-224.
Martínez, P. & Echeverría, B. (2009). Formación Basada en Competencias. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 27(1), 125-147.
Mayoh, J. & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2013). Toward a Conceptualization of Mixed Methods Phenomenological Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(1), 91-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689813505358
Millán, J.M., Congregado, E., Román., C., van Praag, M. & van Stel, A. (2014).The value of an educated population for an individual’s entrepreneurship success. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (5), 612-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.09.003
Morgan, D.L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Researchs, 8(3), 326-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307
Murnieks, Ch.Y., Mosakowski, E. & Cardon, M. S. (2014). Pathways of Passion: Identity Centrality, Passion, and Behavior Among Entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1583-1606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433855
Nuñez, M.C., Fontana, M. & Pascual, I. (2011). Estudio exploratorio de las caracterís- ticas motivacionales del alumnado de la ESO y su relación con las expectativas de rendimiento académico. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 357-382.
OCDE, (2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competences. Executive Summary. París: OCDE.
Oosterbeek, H., van. Praag, M. & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002
Paço, A.M.F., Ferreira, J. M., Raposo, M., Rodrigues, R. G. & Dinis, A. (2011). Behaviours and entrepreneurial intention: empirical findings about secondary students. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 20-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10843-010-0071-9
Palomo, M.T. (2013). Liderazgo y motivación de equipos de trabajo. Madrid: ESIC.
Pomar, M.I. & Pinya, C. (2015). The voice of youths about school and its mark on their lives. Improving Schools, 18(2), 111-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1365480215589662
Puchol, L. (2012). Dirección y Gestión de RRHH. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.
Puig, J.M. & Martín, X. (2007). Competencia en autonomía e iniciativa personal. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Rodríguez, J. (2001). Método de muestreo. Madrid: CIS.
Ruiz, J.I. (2012). Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa. 5ª edición. Universidad de Deusto: Bilbao
Ruskovaara, E. & Pihkala, T. (2013). Teachers implementing entrepreneurship education: classroom practices. Education+Training, 55(2), 204-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400911311304832
Schmidt, J.J., Soper, J.C. & Bernaciak, J. (2013). Creativity in the entrepreneurship program: a survery of the directors of award winning programas. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16, 31-44.
Schunk, D.L. & Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Steenekamp, A. G., Athayde, R. & Van der Merwe, S.P. (2011). An investigation into youth entrepreneurship in selected South African secondary schools: an exploratory study. Southern African Business Review, 15(3), 46-75.
Stemberg, R. (1999). Hanbook of creativity. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Sun, S., Pan, W. & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 989-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019507
Tójar, J.C. (2006). Investigación cualitativa. Comprender y actuar. Madrid: La Muralla.
Torrego, J. C. & Negro, A. (2012). Aprendizaje cooperativo en las aulas: Fundamentos y recursos para su implantación. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Urcola, J.L. (2008). La motivación empieza en uno mismo. Madrid: ESIC Editorial.
Van Hemmen, S., Urbano, D. & Álvarez, C. (2013). Charismatic leadership and entre- preneurial activity: An empirical analysis. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 23(50), 53-65.
Veugelers, W. (2011). Education and Humanism. Linking Autonomy and Humanity. Rot- terdam: Sense Publishers.
Walter, S.G. & Block, J. H. (2016). Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: An ins- titutional perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), 216-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusvent.2015.10.003
Woodside, A.G. (2010). Case study research: theory, methods, practice. Bingley, U.K: Eme- rald Group Pub. Ltd.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Zhang, Y., Duysters, G. & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entre- preneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 623-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
