El día del juicio final: Activando actividades de pensamiento computacional con la cultura popular
Resumen
El interés como construcción de aprendizaje proporciona más que inspiración para la innovación. Dewey reconoció el papel del interés como una herramienta poderosa para involucrar a los estudiantes. Sin embargo, a pesar de los esfuerzos contemporáneos por estudiar el fenómeno, pocos diseños de aprendizaje reconocen este potencial. El presente artículo presenta un marco conceptual para la integración de la cultura popular en STEM, utilizando las competencias de pensamiento computacional como un mecanismo crítico y un contexto para la aplicación y las pruebas. El interés contribuye a la motivación a través de la autorregulación, y la autorregulación tiene el poder de mejorar el ciclo de logro e interés en el aprendizaje. A través de este marco, el Principio de activación de Merrill brinda orientación sobre por qué y cómo debemos atender este ciclo. Al evocar recuerdos positivos relacionados con los intereses del alumno, podemos mejorar otras etapas del aprendizaje desconectadas de la experiencia de aprendizaje inicial. Los educadores y académicos de STEM pueden usar este marco y diseñar y evaluar con confianza actividades de aprendizaje dirigidas al desarrollo del pensamiento computacional utilizando los medios y la cultura populares.
Descargas
Citas
Alsup, P., & Ford, A. (2017). Planning science classroom facilities and resources to improve students’ attitudes. Educational Planning, 24(4), 27–48.
Alvermann, D. E., Moon, J. S., & Hagood, M. C. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. International Reading Association.
Bell, T., & Roberts, J. (2016). Computational thinking is more about humans than computers. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 1, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0030
Bhattacharya, P., & Brown, M. (2020). Bee-Bot for computational thinking: An artifact analysis. In D. A. Schmidt-Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2–7). Online: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/215724
Brackmann, C. P., Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., Casali, A., Robles, G., & Barone, D. (2017). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069
Cachia, W., Aquilina, L., Martinez, H. P., & Yannakakis, G. N. (2014). Procedural generation of music-guided weapons. IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG, 2080, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2014.6932925
Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged approaches to computational thinking: A historical perspective. TechTrends, 64(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<107::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 383–400.
Corkin, D. M., Yu, S. L., Wolters, C. A., & Wiesner, M. (2014). The role of the college classroom climate on academic procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.001
Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. University Press, Macmillan.
Cunningham, J. (2014). Use science fiction to teach STEM, inspire innovation. Education World. https://www.educationworld.com/a_curr/science-fiction-stem-engagement-technology.shtml
Curzon, P., McOwan, P. W., Plant, N., & Meagher, L. R. (2014). Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670767
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 39–80). Academic.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on Motivation (pp. 237–288). University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Riverside.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Heath.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Dousay, T. A. (2016). Effects of redundancy and modality on the situational interest of adult learners in multimedia learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9456-3
Dousay, T. A., & Trujillo, N. P. (2019). An examination of gender and situational interest in multimedia learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12610
Edwards, S. (2015). New concepts of play and the problem of technology, digital media and popular-culture integration with play-based learning in early childhood education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1108929
Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach. (2009). Empathy and education. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 85–97). MIT Press.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
Hidi, S. E., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 215–238). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hidi, S. E., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness–a neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179–194.
Isaac, J. D., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1385
Izu, C., Mirolo, C., Settle, A., Mannila, L., & Stupuriene, G. (2017). Exploring Bebras tasks content and performance: A multinational study. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.03
Jamaludin, A., & Hung, D. (2017). Problem-solving for STEM learning: navigating games as narrativized problem spaces for 21 st century competencies. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0038-0
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71–115.
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II) (pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784-16
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657
Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323
Keller, J. M. (2010). Challenges in learner motivation: A holistic, integrative model for research and design on learner motivation. The 11th International Conference on Education Research.
Keller, J. M. (2016). Motivation, learning, and technology: Applying the ARCS-V motivation model. Participatory Educational Research, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.16.06.3.2
Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), The Handbook of Self-Determination Research (Issue Csikszentmihalyi 1975, pp. 405–427). Rochester University Press.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Erlbaum.
Kuba, R., Rahimi, S., Smith, G., Shute, V., & Dai, C. P. (2021). Using the first principles of instruction and multimedia learning principles to design and develop in-game learning support videos. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1201–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09994-3
Längle, S. (2019). Star Wars science on social media! Using pop culture to improve STEM skills. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 6(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmile.2019.102172
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647–671.
Looi, C. K., How, M. L., Longkai, W., Seow, P., & Liu, L. (2018). Analysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinking. Computer Science Education, 28(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297
Luke, C. (1997). Media literacy and cultural studies. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 19–49). Hampton Press, Inc.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
Merrill, M. D. (2018). Using the First Principles of Instruction to make instruction effective, efficient, and engaging. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technologyarning and Instructional Design Technology. EdTechBooks.org. http://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/using_the_first_principles_of_instruction
Merrill, M. D. (2020). Using multimedia to implement instructional strategies. In First principles of instruction, Revised edition. Association for Educational Communications & Technology. https://aect.org/firstprinciples.php
Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.524
Naur, P. (1970). Planer og ideer for datalogisk institut ved Københavns universitet. http://www.naur.com/comp/c4-6.html
Naur, P. (2005). Computing versus human thinking. A. M. Turing Award Lecture Video; ACM. https://amturing.acm.org/vp/naur_1024454.cfm
Navon, D. (1989). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system ii. Application to the field of attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541448908403082
Nummenmaa, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2008). University students’ emotions, interest and activities in a web-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X203733
O’Keefe, P. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The role of interest in optimizing performance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.004
Palmer, D. H., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2016). Identifying underlying causes of situational interest in a science course for preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 100(6), 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21244
Phillips, J., Morris, A., & Cushman, F. (2019). How we know what not to think. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(12), 1026–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.007
Plass, J. L., O’Keefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., & Perlin, K. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032688
Rathunde, K. (1993). The experience of interest: A theoretical and empirical look at its role in adolescent talent development. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (8th ed., Vol. 8, pp. 59–98). JAI Press.
Reeve, J. (1989). The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992956
Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537
Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Situational principles of instruction. In Instructional-design theories and models: Vol. III (pp. 57–68). Routledge.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In J. M. Harackiewicz & C. Sansone (Eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance (pp. 373–404). Academic Press.
Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.999920
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. A volume in the educational psychology series (pp. 173–195). Academic Press.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2021). Interest development, self-related information processing , and practice. Theory Into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2021.1932159
Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. E., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rodriguez, B., Kennicutt, S., Rader, C., & Camp, T. (2017). Assessing computational thinking in CS unplugged activities. Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017779
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Stiller, J. (1991). The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation and learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (pp. 115–149). JAI Press.
Sansone, C., Thoman, D. B., & Fraughton, T. (2015). The relation between interest and self-regulation in mathematics andd science. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in K-16 mathematics and science learning and related activity (pp. 111–131). American Educational Research Association.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 463–467.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Seufert, T. (2018). The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24(August 2017), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.004
Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2008). Structural dynamics: The challenge of change in goal systems. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 217–229). The Guilford Press.
Silva, D. (2019, December). Science fiction: Why you should be using it with your students! Infusing Technology. https://teachersfirst.com/blog/2019/12/science-fiction-why-you-should-be-using-it-with-your-students/
Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024127
Strauss, M. (2012, March). Ten inventions inspired by science fiction. Smithsonian Magazine.
Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. de, Spector, J. M., Gu, X., & Elen, J. (2017). Toward a systematic and model-based approach to design learning environments for critical thinking. In J. M. Spector & B. B. Lockee (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_79-1
Tobias, S. (2006). The importance of motivation, metacognition, and help seeking in web-based learning. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Web-Based Learning: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 203–220). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trier, J. (2006). Teaching with media and popular culture. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(5), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.49.5.7
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1250
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
Vogt, K. A., Remold, J., & Parker, C. E. (2016). STEM learning games and game design in ITEST projects.
Wang, T., & Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(91)90031-F
Wertz, R. E. H., Fila, N. D., Smith, K. A., & Streveler, R. A. (2020). How do I understand them? Integrating empathy into course design through personas. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274152
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
Wulff, P., Hazari, Z., Petersen, S., & Neumann, K. (2018). Engaging young women in physics: An intervention to support young women’s physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 20113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020113
Zapata-Ros, M. (2018). Computational thinking in the first educational cycles, unplugged computational thinking (I1). RED Hypotheses Blog. Learning in the Knowledge Society. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2019_20_a18
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
