Analysis of evidence on techno-stress, factors, implications, and mitigation strategies in health students.
Abstract
Technology has been widely integrated into health sciences education, especially during the pandemic, fostering digital learning. However, studies reveal challenges such as limited technological skills, technostress, and difficulties in critical tasks. Factors such as age, gender, and motivation influence the use of mobile devices for learning. Technostress, with its negative effects on academic performance, requires strategies to mitigate its impact, particularly among health students. The objective was to analyze the available evidence on technostress, its triggers, and mitigation strategies. A literature search was conducted for publications between 2019 and 2024, available in English and Spanish. The databases consulted included Scopus, PubMed, EBSCO, and ERIC, along with an additional free search. A total of eight articles were included in this integrative review. The methodological assessment criteria suggested by the Equator Network were followed. Technostress, present among health sciences students, arises from excessive use and poor management of technology. Overload, technological complexity, and constant availability expectations intensify it, affecting well-being, academic performance, and mental health. To address it, strengthening computer self-efficacy, implementing institutional support, and adopting personal strategies such as digital disconnection, relaxation, and balanced technology use management are recommended. Proper strategies can turn this challenge into academic growth, and a comprehensive approach that includes institutional support, digital training, teacher adaptation, and healthy habits can mitigate the impact and promote student resilience.
Downloads
Metrics
-
Abstract355
-
pdf (Español (España))314
-
pdf314
References
Lisperguer S, Calvo M, Urrejola G, et al. Clinical Reasoning Training based on the analysis of clinical case using a virtual environment. Educ Med. 2021, 594, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.08.002
Urrejola G, Tiscornia C. Retroalimentación estudiantil sobre herramientas sincrónicas y asincrónicas empleadas en ciencias de la salud en la pandemia por COVID-19. FEM. 2022, 25(1), 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.251.1168
Zhao Y, Pinto A, Sánchez M. Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education. 2021, 168, 104212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
Le C, Le L, Le L. Development and validation of digital competence assessment scale for health professions students (DigiCAS-HPS) during post- COVID-19 new normal era. Preprints.org. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.0931.v1
Cham K, Edwards M, Kruesi L, et al. Digital preferences and perceptions of students in health professional courses at a leading Australian university: A baseline for improving digital skills and competencies in health graduates. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2022, 38(1):69–86.http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6622
Mehrvarz M, Heidari E, Farrokhnia M, et al. The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between student’s digital competence and their academic performance. Computers & Education. 2021, 167.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
Kader M, Abd A, Zaki SM, et al. The effect of technostress on online learning behaviour among undergraduates. Malays J Learn Instr. 2022, 19(1), 183–211.http://dx.doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.7
Pemilia H, Hermawan Y, Widyaningrum B. Student Perceptions Regarding E-Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Level of Technostress. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani. 2023, 3(9), 2039–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i9.6058
Qi C. A double-edgedsword? Exploring the impact of students’ academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019, 38(12), 1337–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1585476
Romero J, Aznar I, Hinojo F. Models of good teaching practices for mobile learning in higher education. Palgrave Commun. 2020, 6(80).https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0468-6
Suria R. Utilización de las tecnologías, tecnoestrés, y su influencia en el rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Anuario de psicologia/The UB Journal of psychology. 2023, 53(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1344/ANPSIC2023.53/2.4
Ponce J, Hernández R, Chiri P. El tecnoestrés en el rendimiento académico en estudiantes Technostress on academic performance in students Techno stress no desempenho acadêmico em estudantes. Horizontes Revista Investigación Ciencias Educación. 2023, 7(28), 852–61. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v7i28.559
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Vandenbroucke JP, Von E, Altman E, et al. Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración. Gac Sanit. 2009, 23(2), 158e1–28. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112009000200015&lng=es.
Khlaif Z, Sanmugam M, Hattab M, et al. Mobile technology features and technostress in mandatory online teaching during the COVID-19 crisis. Heliyon. 2023, 10(9), e19069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19069
Madaan N, Wundavalli L, Satapathy S. Techno stress among medical freshmen: An exploratory study. J Edu Health Promot. 2020, 9(1):178. 10.4103/jehp.jehp_242_19
Ergodan A, Ozturk M, Erdogan P, et al. Technostress in Medical Students During Pandemic-Prompted Distance Education: Adaptation of Technostress Scale Based on Person-Environment Misfit Theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2022, 21(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16635118.v1
Mushtaque I, Awais E, Yazdan M, et al. Technostress and medical students’ intention to use online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan: The moderating effect of computer self-efficacy. Cogent Education. 2022, 9(1), 2102118. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2102118
Alvarez A, Del Aguila S, Yáñez J, et al. Influence of Technostress on Academic Performance of University Medicine Students in Peru during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2021, 13(16), 8949. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168949
Khlaif Z, Sanmugam M, Hattab M, et al. Mobile technology features and technostress in mandatory online teaching during the COVID-19 crisis. Heliyon. 2023, 9(8), e19069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19069
Huanacuni R. Tecnoestrés y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de Enfermería en tiempos de COVID-19. Investigación E Innovación: Revista Científica De Enfermería, 2021, 1(2), 21–7. https://doi.org/10.33326/27905543.2021.2.1218
Torales J, Torres A, Di Giuseppe M, et al. Technostress, anxiety, and depression among university students: A report from Paraguay. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2022, 68(5), 1063–70.10.1177/00207640221099416
Kasemy Z, Sharif A, Barakat A, et al. Technostress Creators and Outcomes Among Egyptian Medical Staff and Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Remote Working Environment During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health. 2022, 26(10), 796321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.796321
Garg N, Shivangi V, Palframan J. Positive reframing as a mediator between gratitude and technostress amongst Indian students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kybernetes. 2022, 52(8), 2810–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2021-1250
Wang X, Tan SC, Li L. Technostress in university students’ technology-enhanced learning: An investigation from multidimensional person-environment misfit. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020, 105(106208). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106208
Lin Y, Yu Z. An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review modelling students’ technostress in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2024, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2332458
Yunita S, Susilawati S, Riniawati R, et al. Exploring college students’ technostress phenomenon in using ed-tech. Journal of Research in Instructional. 2023, 3(2), 242–57.https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i2.280
Maipita I, Rahman D, Husrizal S, et al. TPACK, Organizational Support, and Technostress in Explaining Teacher Performance During Fully Online Learning. Journal of information technology education: research. 2023, 22, 41–70. https://doi.org/10.28945/5069
Quispe J, Quispe U, Farias C, et al. Tecnoestrés en el desgaste académico de estudiantes universitarios del Perú. Areté Rev Digit Dr Educ. 2024, 10(19), 165–81. https://doi.org/10.55560/arete.2024.19.10.9
Kwaah CY, Adu-Yeboah C, Amuah E, et al. Exploring preservice teachers’ digital skills, stress, and coping strategies during online lessons amid covid-19 pandemic in Ghana. Cogent Education. 2022, 9(1), 2107292. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2107292
Wang Q, Zhao G, Zeng J. The effects of facilitating conditions, digital competence, and technostress on higher education students’ digital informal learning: A moderated mediation examination. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2024, 40(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9324
Vallo H, Master C, Pålsson P. et al. Designing for digital transformation of residency education – a post-pandemic pedagogical response. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 23, 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04390-2
Iancu A, Kemp M, Alam H. Unmuting medical students’ education: utilizing telemedicine during the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond. J Med Internet Res. 2020, 22 (7), e19667. https://doi.org/10.2196/19667
Karimi H, Khawaja S. Faculty Development Interventions in Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences. 2025, 15(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020176
Copyright (c) 2025 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
