¿SUBVERTIR O SITUAR LA IDENTIDAD? SOPESANDO LAS ESTRATEGIAS FEMINISTAS DE JUDITH BUTLER Y SEYLA BENHABIB

Authors

  • María José Guerra Palmero
Keywords: identidad, feminismo, crítica, ética y política, identity, feminism, critic, ethics, politics

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to estimate the worth of two feminist strategies over identity. Judith Butler, from a foucaultian point of view, propose to subvert the category of identity as a <> with disciplinary effects over individuals. Seyla Benhabib, who bets for <> thinks that is better to try to contextualize the identities without having to recur to an abstract, formal and empty mode of self hegemonic in the philosophical tradition. Why are we interesting in this debate? Because the ethic and political consequences of this theoretical controversy are decisive to redescribe the feminist identification based on the concept of woman. The <> is one of the polemical focus in a feminist philosophical movement that, finally, have won academic credibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Guerra Palmero, M. J. (1997). ¿SUBVERTIR O SITUAR LA IDENTIDAD? SOPESANDO LAS ESTRATEGIAS FEMINISTAS DE JUDITH BUTLER Y SEYLA BENHABIB. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, (14), 143–154. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/8541
Issue
Section
Discusión