Semantic modelling of self-realization of the personality
Abstract
Introduction. The research is focused on studying self-organization of the personality in aspect of subjectness. The technique of modeling of social and role identification of the personality is presented. The research objective - to define semantic constructs self-updating in modeling of personal identification. Methods and techniques.- Semantic approach in structuring dichotomizing couples of constructs of personal identification is used. Offered original technique "Semantic Modelling of Self-organization of the Personality" ("SMSOP"). Respondents fill "Repertoire lattices" of J. Kelly. Results of sample are factorized. Respondents make modeling of in images "I am-real", "I am-ideal" and also images of "The Self-updated Personality" (SUP) and "Nonconformist" (NC), using a set of the linguistic constructs received by means of repertoire lattices of J. Kelly). The participants are 218 psychology students. Results and discussion. Comparative data of self-renewing constructs (in the aspect of "I-ideal") and the SUP and Oil Company models are shown. Although soup is a reference model of personality achievements (according to A. Maslow et al.), a NK reveals the properties of self-affirmation, In the semantics of mental self-organization (MSS) of a personality, respondents are not fully focused on these standards. The results of the factor analysis showed the peculiarities of the semantics of the students' personality MCO in the aspect of self-renewal ("I-ideal"): emotional spontaneity and, at the same time, fortitude and self-confidence, as well as communication and well-being in life (associated with intelligence, ingenuity). Conclusions.- The semantics of self-renewing personalities is revealed to young people in positions that determine the possible, achievable aspects of the perspective of their life. The SUP and NC models are "perfect" for them.
Downloads
References
Artemyeva E.Yu. (1999). Fundamentals of the psychology of subjective semantics. Moscow: Science; Sense. (in Russian).
Bandura A. (2017). (ed.). Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. Transaction Publishers.
Bar M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 11, 7, 280-89. CrossRef/Google Scholar. PubMed
Barrett L.F. (2009). The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain. Perspectives in Psychological Science. 4, 326-39.
Bohm D. (2010). Causality and chance in modern physics. Moscow: Krasand. (in Russian).
Brushlinsky A.V. (2002). Psychology of the subject: individual and the group. Psychological Journal. 23, 1, 72-80. (in Russian).
Clark A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 36, 3, 181-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
Farmer T.A., Brown M. & Tanenhaus M.K. (2013). Prediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 36, 3, 211-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002312
Fodor J.A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. The MIT press.
Fogelson R.D. (1982). Person, Self, and Identity: Some Anthropological Retrospects, Circumspects, and Prospects. In: Lee B. (eds) of Psychosocial Theories of the Self. Path in Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA.
Heylighen F. (2011). Self-organization of complex, intelligent systems: an action ontology for transdisciplinary integration. Integral Review. 134, 1-39.
Hirsh J.B., Mar R.A., Peterson J.B. (2013). Personal narratives as the highest level of cognitive integration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge University Press. 10 May. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002269
Hockenmaier J. (2003). Parsing with Generative Models of Predicate-Argument Structure. Association for Computational Linguistics. In book Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. 1, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.3115/1075096.1075142
Karakozov S.D., Ryzhova N.I. (2019). Information and education systems in the context of digitalization of education. Zhurnal SFU. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Journal of SFU. Humanitarian sciences]. 9, 359-366.
Kelly G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. V. 1-2. New York: Norton.
Klochko V.E. (2005). Self-organization in psychological systems: problems of the formation of the mental space of an individual (introduction to trans-spectral analysis). Tomsk: TSU. (in Russian).
Koestern R., Hope N.A. (2014). Self-determination theory approach to goals. In M. Gagne (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination heory. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199794911.001.0001.
Leskov L.V. (2008). Unknown Universe. Moscow: Publishing house LCI. (in Russian).
Levine D.S. (2018). Introduction to neural and cognitive modeling. Routledge.
Pirozhkova S.V. (2018). Forecasting and its place in the system of scientific knowledge. Problems of Philosophy. 11, 118-129. (in Russian).
Podoprigora A.V. (2016). Generator of reality: information and mechanisms of self-organization. Antinomies. 4, 17-32. (in Russian).
Richardson, M. J., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014). Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: Theory, modeling, and analysis. In H. T. Reis & Judd C.M. (Eds.). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. 253–282. Cambridge University Press.
Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation Development and Wellnessi. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sergienko E.A. (2013). The problem of the correlation of the concepts of subject and personality. Psychological Journal. 34, 2, 5-16. (in Russian).
Serkin V.P. (2016). Psychosemantics: textbook and workshop for undergraduate and graduate programs. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House. (in Russian).
Shadrikov V.D. (2017). Neocognitive Psychology: Monograph. Moscow: Universitetskaya book. (in Russian).
Tatenko V.A. (1996). Psychology in the subjective dimension. Moscow: Ed. Center of "Enlightenment". (in Russian).
Vygotsky L.S. (1934). Thinking and speech. Moscow: Sotsekgiz. (in Russian).
Wang, Q. (2011). Autobiographical Memory and Culture. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 5(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1047
Whitehead N.L., M. Wesc. (2012). Human no more: Digital subjectivities, unhuman subjects, and the end of anthropology. University Press of Colorado.
M.'s Whittingham(2018). Identity and Self-Determination. In book: The Self and Social Relations. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77246-2_7
Znakov V.V. (2016). Psychology of understanding the human world. Moscow: Publishing house "Institute of Psychology RAS". (in Russian).
Copyright (c) 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones, University of Murcia (Spain)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
