USEFULNESS OF DIFFERENT HINTS IN SOLVING AN INSIGHT PROBLEM: RELATION-SHIP WITH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES

Authors

  • Reinaldo Martínez Fernández
  • Elisabet Tubaut
  • Llorenç Guilera
  • Samuel Rabanaque
  • Edgar Sánchez
Keywords: metacognition, problem solving, comprehension, self-appraisal, insight

Abstract

In this work it is studied the relationship between metacogni-tion and the efficacy of different hints while solving an insight problem. Participants attempted to solve the three bulbs problem either without any hint or after receiving hints with different levels of abstraction, and an-swered the O’Neil & Abedi’s (1996) self-report inventory about metacog-nitive strategies. Surprisingly, the different hints did not improve perform-ance, compared to the no-hint condition. Nevertheless, a significant inter-action between type of hint and level in metacognition was revealed by additional analyses. Only a few participants (less than 30%) solved the problem when the hint was very abstract or no hint was presented, regard-less of their metacognitive level. However, the participants who scored higher on metacognition performed better when more direct hints, refer-ring to a key concept to solve the problem, were presented. Hence, these results suggest that metacognitive strategies play a significant role on recognizing the relevance of specific information to problem solving.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Reinaldo Martínez Fernández

Universidad Católica Andrés Bello Venezuela

Elisabet Tubaut

Universidad de Barcelona España

Llorenç Guilera

Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona España

Samuel Rabanaque

Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona España

Edgar Sánchez

Universidad de Barcelona España
How to Cite
Martínez Fernández, R., Tubaut, E., Guilera, L., Rabanaque, S., & Sánchez, E. (2008). USEFULNESS OF DIFFERENT HINTS IN SOLVING AN INSIGHT PROBLEM: RELATION-SHIP WITH METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 24(1), 16–24. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/31661
Issue
Section
Developmental and Educational Psychology

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
5992
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)