What do we know about students’ positioning themselves in STEM? A systematic literature review
Supporting Agencies
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
- AGAUR
Abstract
The rise of the educational perspective STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) in educational research and innovation has led to the publication of many studies on the evolution of student positioning towards STEM disciplines and activities. The aim of this study is to synthesize the major contributions of these investigations, which are developed within the compulsory school stage, focusing specially on interest, ability, self-efficacy, and aspirations. A systematic review of the publications in the literature of the last 10 years (2011-2021) has been carried out in the most relevant databases, following the PRISMA model (Moher et al., 2009). The thematic analysis of the 73 documents included confirms the diversity of approaches to the study of STEM identity, addressed from a disciplinary approach or as a global identity. Results also evince different limitations related to some constructs considered in STEM identity development that cause inequalities among the students. The mutual influence between the different constructs considered not only allows to deepen the characterization of students’ STEM identity, but also suggests several entry points for the development of strategies that can promote a development of a positive STEM identity.
Downloads
References
Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2014). Expectancy-value models for the STEM persistence plans of ninth-grade, high-ability students: A comparison between black, hispanic, and white students. Science Education, 98(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21092
Archer, L., & Dewitt, J. (2015). Science Aspirations and Gender Identity: Lessons from the ASPIRES Project. En E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, & J. Ryder (Eds.), Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education (pp. 89–102). Springer Editorial. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J. F., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). “Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous”: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The “Exceptional” Physics Girl: A Sociological Analysis of Multimethod Data From Young Women Aged 10–16 to Explore Gendered Patterns of Post-16 Participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379
Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies (1ª Edición). Cambridge University Press.
Buontempo, J., Riegle-Crumb, C., Patrick, A., & Peng, M. (2017). Examining gender differences in engineering identity among high school engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018579
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea
Chapman, A., Rodriguez, F. D., Pena, C., Hinojosa, E., Morales, L., Del Bosque, V., Tijerina, Y., & Tarawneh, C. (2020). “Nothing is impossible”: characteristics of Hispanic females participating in an informal STEM setting. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09947-6
Chu, S. L., Schlegel, R. J., Quek, F., Christy, A., & Chen, K. (2017). 'I Make, Therefore I Am'. En Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17) (pp. 109–120), New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025458
Couso, D., & Simarro, C. (2020). STEM Education Through the Epistemological Lens. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 17–28). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381-3
Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & Pinkard, N. (2017). Digital Youth Divas. En Rankin, Y., & Thomas, J. (Ed.), Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology (pp. 152-173). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch008
Flowers, A. M., & Banda, R. M. (2019). An Investigation of Black Males in Advanced Placement Math and Science Courses and Their Perceptions of Identity Related to STEM Possibilities. Gifted Child Today, 42(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519842213
Garcia, Y. V. (2013). A case study exploring science competence and science confidence of middle school girls from marginalized backgrounds [tesis doctoral, University of Northern Colorado]. Repositorio ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1428371735
Garvin-Hudson, B., & Jackson, T. O. (2018). A case for culturally relevant science education in the summer for African American youth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(8), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1478156
Grimalt-Álvaro, C., & Couso, D. (2021). Developing STEM Identities in Students in the “Big Middle”. Connections between Identity and Socioeconomic Level. In E. Carlton Parsons, R. S. Schwartz, D. Bressler, N. Makki, & J. Plummer (Eds.), NARST 94th Annual International Conference (p. 119).
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
Hinds, B. F. (2014). A study of the experience of female African-American seventh graders in a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) afterschool program [tesis doctoral, Eastern Michigan University]. Repositorio institucional. http://commons.emich.edu/theses/822
Johnson, C. C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Moore, T. J., & English, L. D. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of Research on STEM Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381
Kang, H., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., D. Simpkins, S., Rhee, H. yon, & Turner, C. (2019). How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities?. Science Education, 103(2), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21492
Kier, M. W. (2013). Examining the Effects of a STEM Career Video Intervention on the Interests and STEM Professional Identities of Rural, Minority Middle School Students [tesis doctoral, North Carolina State University]. Repositorio institucional. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM Identity Among Young Women: A Social Identity Perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
Koch, M., Lundh, P., & Harris, C. J. (2019). Investigating STEM Support and Persistence Among Urban Teenage African American and Latina Girls Across Settings. Urban Education, 54(2), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915618708
Koul, R., Lerdpornkulrat, T., & Poondej, C. (2017). Gender contentedness in aspirations to become engineers or medical doctors. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1303450
Lewis Ellison, T., Robinson, B., & Qiu, T. (2020). Examining African American Girls’ Literate Intersectional Identities Through Journal Entries and Discussions About STEM. Written Communication, 37(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319880511
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ (Online), 339(7716), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
Oyserman, D., & Fryberg, S. (2006). The Possible Selves of Diverse Adolescents: Content and Function Across Gender, Race, and National Origin. En C. Dunkel & J. Kerpelman (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–23). Nova Science Publishers. http://www.novapublishers.org/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=2650
Pinkard, N., Martin, C. K., & Erete, S. (2020). Equitable approaches: opportunities for computational thinking with emphasis on creative production and connections to community. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636070
Pleasants, J. (2020). Inquiring into the Nature of STEM Problems: Implications for Pre-college Education. Science and Education, 29(4), 831–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00135-5
Rahm, J., & Moore, J. C. (2016). A case study of long-term engagement and identity-in-practice: Insights into the STEM pathways of four underrepresented youths. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 768–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21268
Reinhold, S., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2018). Encouraging a career in science: a research review of secondary schools’ effects on students’ STEM orientation. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1442900
Riedinger, K., & Taylor, A. (2016). “I Could See Myself as a Scientist”: The Potential of Out-of-School Time Programs to Influence Girls’ Identities in Science. Afterschool Matters, 23, 1–7.
Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0
Sinclair, S., Nilsson, A., & Cederskär, E. (2019). Explaining gender-typed educational choice in adolescence: The role of social identity, self-concept, goals, grades, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(Noviembre 2018), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.007
Starr, C. R., Hunter, L., Dunkin, R., Honig, S., Palomino, R., & Leaper, C. (2020). Engaging in science practices in classrooms predicts increases in undergraduates’ STEM motivation, identity, and achievement: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1093–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21623
Starr, C. R., & Leaper, C. (2019). Do adolescents’ self-concepts moderate the relationship between STEM stereotypes and motivation? Social Psychology of Education, 22(5), 1109–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09515-4
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). Investigating the use of robotics to increase girls’ interest in engineering during early elementary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(5), 1033–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9483-y
Suter, W. N. (2012). Qualitative Data, Analysis, and Design. En Introduction to Educational Research. A Critical Thinking Approach (2ª Edición, pp. 342–386). SAGE Publications. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483384443
Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123
Todd, B. L., & Zvoch, K. (2019). Exploring Girls’ Science Affinities Through an Informal Science Education Program. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1647–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9670-y
Verdín, D., Godwin, A., & Ross, M. (2018). STEM roles: How students’ ontological perspectives facilitate STEM identities. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 8(2), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1167
Wade-Jaimes, K., Cohen, J. D., & Calandra, B. (2019). Mapping the evolution of an after-school STEM club for African American girls using activity theory. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(4), 981–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9886-9
Wagstaff, I. R. (2014). Predicting 9th Graders’ Science Self-efficacy and STEM Career Intent: A Multilevel Approach [tesis doctoral, North Carolina State University]. Repositorio institucional. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
Wang, J. (2013). Ingenuity lab: Making and engineering through design challenges at a science center. En ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--19766
Wong, B. (2017). ‘I’m good, but not that good’: digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604
Young, J. L., Ero-Tolliver, I., Young, J. R., & Ford, D. Y. (2017). Maximizing Opportunities to Enroll in Advanced High School Science Courses: Examining the Scientific Dispositions of Black Girls. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 13, 174–183.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.