The potential, limitations and evaluation of education networks in a monocentric system
Abstract
In almost all education systems, there has been an increasingly incentivised drive to establish and promote local education networks. In the case of Ireland, funded education networks referred to as ‘education clusters’ have been set up to allow schools to collaborate to increase innovation capacity as well as enhance the return on educational investment through economies of scale. While commendable in theory, there is nevertheless, limited evidence relating to the priorities of these networks as perceived by those who are at the core of them, namely teachers. There is also limited research relating to who should be involved in setting evaluation methodologies and standards for the network. As such, using Ireland as a case example, our study was guided by three interconnected questions; what should the priorities of education networks be, what are the benefits and challenges for such priorities and who should be involved in the development of evaluation methodologies and standards?
Findings, many of which we suggest have considerable relevance to most education systems, reveal that, while in theory, although the appeal of education networks in the form of enhanced professional capital is evident, there are still many issues that need to be resolved to enable such networks to deliver on their theoretical possibilities. These include the limitations of reciprocity among network members and the need for facilitated supports to moderate the competitive nature of schools in a network, allowing for competitive collaboration to occur. Importantly, in this research a significant majority of school principals did not see or were not favourable to the idea of education networks being used for cost reductions through economies of scale.
Downloads
References
Azorín, C. M., & Muijs, D. (2017). Networks and collaboration in Spanish education policy. Educational Research, 59(3), 273-296.
Barber, M., Chijioke, C., & Mourshed, M. (2010). Education: How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
Brown, M., McNamra, G., & O’Hara, J. (2015). School Inspection in a Polycentric Context: The case of Northern Ireland. Dublin: EQI.
Brown M.,McNamara G.,O’Hara J.,O'Brien S. & Faddar J. (2018) 'Integrated co-professional evaluation? Converging approaches to school evaluation across frontiers'. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (12):76-90
Centre for School Leadership (2018a). Excellence through Collaborative Leadership and Management. Retrieved from: https://www.cslireland.ie/leadership-clusters.html
Centre for School Leadership (2018b). Application Form for Clusters. Retrieved from: https://www.cslireland.ie/leadership-clusters.html
Centre for School Leadership (2018c). Excellence through Collaborative Leadership and Management. Retrieved from: https://www.cslireland.ie/leadership-clusters.html
Chapman, C. (2008). Towards a framework for school-to-school networking in challenging circumstances. Educational research, 50(4), 403-420.
Chapman, C., & Hadfield, M. (2010). Realising the potential of school-based networks. Educational research, 52(3), 309-323.
Chapman, C, & Hadfield, M. (2009). Leading school-based networks. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage Publications.
Daly, A., and Finnigan, K. (2012). Exploring the space between: Social networks, trust, and urban school district leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 22(3), pp. 493–530.
Department of Education and Skills (2012). Circular 0040/2012. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
Department of Education and Skills (2018a). Schools funded to work together on Experimental Projects, as Minister Bruton rewards Excellence & Innovation [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.education.ie/en/Press-Events/Press-Releases/2018-press-releases/PR2018-04-02.html
Department of Education and Skills (2018b). A Short Guide to the areas of provision and the services supported by Teacher Education Section. Available at:
Department of Education and Skills (2019). Cumasu: Empowering Through Education. Available at: https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Corporate-Reports/Strategy-Statement/action-plan-for-education-2019.pdf
Ehren, M. C., & Godfrey, D. (2017). External accountability of collaborative arrangements; a case study of a Multi Academy Trust in England. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(4), 339-362.
Ehren, M. Janssens, F., Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J. & Shevlin, P. (2017).
Evaluation and decentralised governance: the case of inspections in polycentric education systems. Journal of Educational Change, 18 (3), 365-383.
Díaz-Gibson, J., Civís, M., Daly, A.J., Longás, J. & Riera, J. (2017). “Networked leadership in educational collaborative networks”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45 (6), 1040-1059. Friel, N., Chestnutt, H., & Chapman, C. (2017). Taking the lead: teachers leading educational reform through collaborative enquiry in Scotland. In Teachers Leading Educational Reform (pp. 27-47). London: Routledge.
Glazer, J. & Peurach, D. (2013). School Improvement Networks as a Strategy for Large-Scale Education Reform The Role of Educational Environments. Educational Policy, 27(4), 676–710.
González, A., Pino, M. & Ahumada, L. (2017). Transitar desde el mejoramiento escolar al mejoramiento sistémico: Oportunidades y desafíos de las redes escolares en Chile. Chile: Centro de Liderazgo para la Mejora Escolar.
Goodall, J, Day, C, Lindsay, G, Muijs, D & Harris, A. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Professional Development. vol. Research Report RR659, London:Department for Education.
Government of Ireland (2018). Empowering through learning. Action Plan for Education 2019.Available at: https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Corporate-Reports/Strategy-Statement/action-plan-for-education-2019.pdf
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York:Teachers College Press.
Janssens, F. J., & Ehren, M. C. (2016). Toward a model of school inspections in a polycentric system. Evaluation and program planning, 56, 88-98.
Lawlor, A. (2014). Transitions Toward Transformation: Exploring Continuing Professional Development for Teachers in Ireland (2 Vols.). Doctoral dissertation, National University of Ireland Maynooth.
Lieberman, A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1992). Networks for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Phi delta kappan, 73(9), 673.
McCormick, R., Fox, A., Carmichael, P., & Procter, R. (2010). Researching and understanding educational networks. London:Routledge.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Muijs, D., West, M., & Ainscow, M. (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 5–26.
Moolenaar, N. (2010). Ties with potential. Nature, antecedents, and consequences of social networks in school teams. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Morgan, D.F & Cook, B.J. ( 2015) New Public Governance: A Regime Centred Perspective. London: Routledge
OECD (2012). Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, OECD Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-e
OECD (2015) Improving schools in Scotland: an OECD perspective. OECD, Paris.
Katz, S., & Earl, L. (2007). Creating New Knowledge: Evaluating Networked Learning Communities. Education Canada, 47(1), 34-37.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Wohlstetter, P., Malloy, C. L., Chau, D., & Polhemus, J. L. (2003) .Improving schools through networks: A new approach to urban school reform. Educational Policy, 17(4), 399-430.
Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2018). The Effects of Networked Professional Learning Communities. Journal of Teacher Education. DOI: 0022487117753574.
Sammons, P., Mujtaba, T., Earl, L., & Gu, Q. (2007).Participation in network learning community programmes and standards of pupil achievement: Does it make a difference? School Leadership and Management, 27(3), 213-238.
Teacher Professional Networks (2017). What is the Teacher Professional Networks Scheme (TPN)? Available at: http://www.tpnetworks.ie/
Smith, A. K., & Wohlstetter, P. (2001). Reform through school networks: A new kind of authority and accountability. Educational policy, 15(4), 499-519.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.
The articles and scientific documents published in RIE abide the following conditions:
1. The Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (the publisher) has the property rights (copyright) of all the documents published and allows the reuse under the user’s license indicated in point 2.
2. All documents are published in the digital edition of RIE under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal document) license. These documents can be copied, used, distributed, communicated and explained publicly if: i) the author(s) and its original source of publishing (magazine, publisher and URL of the document) are cited; ii) it is not used for commercial purpose; iii) the existence and the specifications about this license are mentioned.
3. Auto-archive’s conditions. The authors are allowed and encouraged to digitally distribute the pre-print versions (a version before evaluation) and/or post-print (a version that it is already evaluated and accepted to its publication). This promotes circulation and distribution earlier and can increase the citations and significance within the academic community.
