Practicing argumentation in secondary education: the effect of sex

Authors

  • Miguel Jesús Bascón Díaz Facultad Psicología, Dpto. Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla, 954557718
  • Josefa Salguero Fornet Licenciada Ciencias-Técnicas Estadísticas, 954557718
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.2.211161
Keywords: Argumentation, discourse, secondary education, sex

Supporting Agencies

  • Consejería Educación
  • Junta Andalucía
  • Plan Cultura de Paz y Noviolencia

Abstract

This paper analyzes argumentation in secondary education based on previous considerations such as its limited presence in the classroom and the controversy about how it relates to sex. We delimited and characterized two dimensions of argumentative discourse (form and content) according to sex and situational variables: type of group and type of dilemma. Applying the Hi-Loglinear technique; we analyzed a sample of 2250 utterances by 38 (female and male) adolescents; debating about group conflict and intimate partner violence. In general; the students used low levels of argumentation; although female students used significantly more argumentation than their male counterparts which is an effect of the relation between sex and argumentation situated by contextual variables. Finally; we look at some practical applications for teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
02-07-2015
How to Cite
Bascón Díaz, M. J., & Salguero Fornet, J. (2015). Practicing argumentation in secondary education: the effect of sex. Journal of Educational Research, 33(2), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.2.211161
Issue
Section
Articles