Long-Term Trends in the Attractiveness of Obstetrics and Gynecology Among Spanish Medical Graduates: Evidence from the MIR Allocation System (2001–2026).
Resumo
Objective: To analyze the evolution of the attractiveness of OBGYN within the Spanish Medical Residency Training System (MIR) between 2001 and 2026 using objective indicators of specialty choice. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using publicly available data from the Spanish Ministry of Health. Annual OBGYN residency allocation data from 2001 to 2026 were analyzed. Indicators included the number of positions offered, first and last rank numbers selecting the specialty, median rank number, demand rankings, and quotation index. Temporal trends were evaluated using descriptive analyses and graphical representations. Results: During the study period, the number of OBGYN residency positions increased from 181 to 284 (+56.9%). The rank number of the last allocated position increased from 2,578 to 4,521, whereas the quotation index remained relatively stable, ranging from 113.5 to 139.1. OBGYN consistently occupied a favorable position among MIR specialties, ranking between 10th and 17th place in the global quotation ranking and between 2nd and 6th place among medical-surgical specialties. Top-demand and total-demand indicators also remained consistently favorable, with OBGYN generally positioned among the most demanded specialties throughout the study period. Conclusions: Despite substantial changes in healthcare systems, professional expectations, and working conditions, the attractiveness of OBGYN within the Spanish MIR system remained stable over the last 26 years. Although some rank-based indicators worsened over time, demand- and quotation-based measures continued to position OBGYN among the most attractive medical and surgical specialties. These findings do not support the widespread perception of a progressive decline in the attractiveness of the specialty.
Downloads
-
Resumo0
-
pdf 0
-
xml 0
Referências
Querido SJ, Vergouw D, Wigersma L, Batenburg RS, De Rond MEJ, Ten Cate OTJ. Dynamics of career choice among students in undergraduate medical courses. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 33. Medical Teacher. 2016, 38(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1074990
2. Van der Aa JE, Goverde AJ, Scheele F. Improving the training of the future gynaecologist: development of a European curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG-PACT). Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018, 10(1), 1-2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6260669/
3. Spain E, Tumelty ME, Hannigan A, Cinnamond K, Cheema A, Cotter A. Factors impacting on the decision of graduate entry medical school students to pursue a career in obstetrics and gynecology in Ireland. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 23(1), 449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04425-8
4. Castelo‐Branco C, Figueras F, Eixarch E, et al. Stress symptoms and burnout in obstetric and gynaecology residents. BJOG. 2007, 114(1), 94-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01155.x
5. Dapueto JJ, Nozar F, Artucio S, Sánchez D, Aguirrezábal P, Briozzo L. Effectiveness of an organizational intervention aimed to reduce burnout and emotional distress, and improve quality of life of an Obstetrics–Gynecology team. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research. 2026, 41(3), 101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101156
6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong, Lam CY, Cheung CS, Hui AS. Factors influencing the career interest of medical graduates in obstetrics and gynaecology in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Hong Kong Med J. 2016, 22(2), 138–43 https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj154650
7. Hammoud MM, Morgan HK, George K, et al. Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes. JAMA Netw Open. 2024, 7(2), e2355017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55017
8. Harris JE, Lopez‐Valcarcel BG, Barber P, Ortún V. Allocation of Residency Training Positions in Spain: Contextual Effects on Specialty Preferences. Health Economics. 2017, 26(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3318
9. Coste A, Morland D, Becker JM, et al. A retrospective longitudinal study of students’ residency choices at the French medical ranking exam. BMC Med Educ. 2025, 25(1), 1677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08148-w
10. Hui L, Feng K, Tao J, Chang O. A retrospective analysis of specialty match rate and gender trends in Canadian residency applications (2019–2024). Mitra S, ed. PLoS One. 2025, 20(10), e0334134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334134
11. Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ, San Frutos-Lorente L, Brescó-Torras P. Determinant Factors in Satisfaction and Choice of the Gynecology and Obstetrics Specialty in Spain. A Census Analysis. Prog Obstet Ginecol. 2025, 68(2), 37-43. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10228899
12. Szcześniewska S, Zaręba K, Zgliczyński WS, Ciebiera M, Feduniw S. Occupational burnout among obstetrics and gynaecology residents: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2025, 13, 1666659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1666659
13. Barber-Pérez P, González-López-Valcárcel B. Actualización: Informe de necesidad de médicos especialistas en España 2023-2035. Published online 2024. https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/profesionesSanitarias/profesiones/necesidadEspecialistas/docs/Oferta_y_necesidad_de_medicos_especialistas_en_Espana_2023-2035.pdf
14. Sánchez Martínez S, Solís García Del Pozo J, Cabeza Osorio L, Gómez Garrido J, Méndez Bailón M, Alfaro Martínez JJ. Analysis of the Internal Medicine specialty demand in Spanish exam for accessing to the Resident Physicians Training Program through the quotation index (2001–2024). Revista Clínica Española (English Edition). 2025, 225(5), 102278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2025.102278
15. Alfaro-Martínez JJ, García Blasco L, Quílez Toboso RP, et al. Evolución de la elección de plazas MIR de Endocrinología y Nutrición 2001-2022 medida mediante el índice de cotización. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición. 2023, 70(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endinu.2022.07.003
16. Torres Moreno MP, Blanco Herrera R, Vegas Fernández L, Alfaro Martínez JJ. Elección de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria en el MIR 2002-2023: un enfoque objetivo muestra que es una especialidad tan valorada como las hospitalarias. Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN. 2024, 50(5), 102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102198
17. Barranquero AG, Maestre González Y, Mestres Petit N, et al. Delay in the residents’ choice for General and Digestive Surgery: Analysis of the period 2018–2022. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2024, 102(8), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2023.08.006
18. Studdert DM. Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment. JAMA. 2005, 293(21), 2609. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2609
19. Baas MAM, Stramrood CAI, Molenaar JE, van Baar PM, Vanhommerig JW, van Pampus MG. Continuing the conversation: a cross-sectional study about the effects of work-related adverse events on the mental health of Dutch (resident) obstetrician-gynaecologists (ObGyns). BMC Psychiatry. 2024, 24(1), 286. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05678-3
20. Slade P, Balling K, Sheen K, et al. Work-related post-traumatic stress symptoms in obstetricians and gynaecologists: findings from INDIGO, a mixed-methods study with a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. BJOG. 2020, 127(5), 600-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16076
21. McCarthy CM, O’Sullivan S, Corcoran P, et al. Medicine, media and the law: The effect on training in obstetrics and gynaecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021, 257, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.004
22. Bourne T, Shah H, Falconieri N, et al. Burnout, well-being and defensive medical practice among obstetricians and gynaecologists in the UK: cross-sectional survey study. BMJ Open. 2019, 9(11), e030968. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030968
23. Ní hÉalaithe C, Howard A, Corcoran P, et al. Factors influencing medical students’ decision to pursue a career in obstetrics and gynaecology. PLoS One. 2023, 18(12), e0288130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288130
24. Harris JE, González López-Valcárcel B, Ortún V, Barber P. Specialty choice in times of economic crisis: a cross-sectional survey of Spanish medical students. BMJ Open. 2013, 3(2), e002051. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002051
25. Gallo P, Gené-Badia J. Cuts drive health system reforms in Spain. Health Policy. 2013, 113(1-2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.06.016
26. Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, et al. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet. 2013, 381(9874), 1323-1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6
27. González Castro P, Campos Pavón J, Carazo Casas C. Predictive validity of academy mock tests against MIR exam: a retrospective multicohort observational concordance study. Rev Esp Edu Med. 2025, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.681901
28. Carpio Salmerón M, Carazo-Casas C, Benito P, et al. Frontier Large Language Models on the 2026 Spanish MIR Examination: A Multimodal Cross-Sectional Evaluation. Rev Esp Edu Med. 2026, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.716401
29. Freire JM, Infante A, De Aguiar AC, Carbajo P. An analysis of the medical specialty training system in Spain. Hum Resour Health. 2015, 13(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0038-y
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Múrcia
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista estão sujeitos aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Murcia (o editor) preserva os direitos económicos (direitos de autor) das obras publicadas e favorece e permite a sua reutilização ao abrigo da licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
2. Os trabalhos são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-NãoDerivada 4.0.
3. Condições de autoarquivamento. Os autores estão autorizados e incentivados a divulgar eletronicamente as versões pré-impressas (versão antes de ser avaliada e enviada à revista) e / ou pós-impressas (versão avaliada e aceita para publicação) de seus trabalhos antes da publicação, desde que favorece sua circulação e difusão mais precoce e com ela possível aumento de sua citação e alcance junto à comunidade acadêmica.
