Gamificación como estrategia de aprendizaje en la formación de profesionales de ciencias de la salud en cirugía: revisión sistemática.
Resumo
A formação dos profissionais das ciências da saúde enfrenta desafios significativos devido à constante evolução das metodologias pedagógicas e das ferramentas de aprendizagem. A incorporação de tecnologias educativas disruptivas transformou os ambientes de formação, tanto na sala de aula como em contextos clínicos reais, permitindo experiências de aprendizagem mais dinâmicas, interativas e centradas no aluno. Estas tecnologias favorecem o desenvolvimento de competências e a simulação de contextos clínicos, o que facilita a aquisição de habilidades e conhecimentos essenciais na área da saúde.
Objetivo: Analisar a implementação da gamificação como estratégia de aprendizagem para a formação de profissionais das ciências da saúde no contexto cirúrgico.
Metodologia: A investigação baseia-se numa revisão sistemática da literatura, realizada através de pesquisas em bases de dados como Pubmed, Bireme, Springerlink, Sage, Embase, Scopus e ProQuest, utilizando uma estratégia construída com termos padronizados. Foram recolhidos dados relacionados com ferramentas e a utilização da gamificação em cirurgia.
Resultados: Foram incluídos 19 artigos na revisão, com ênfase no tipo de estudo, nos procedimentos cirúrgicos em que se utilizou a gamificação, nas ferramentas tecnológicas, nas plataformas e nos elementos da gamificação.
Conclusão: A implementação da gamificação tem um impacto positivo no desenvolvimento de competências em contextos cirúrgicos.
Downloads
-
Resumo24
-
xml (Español (España))0
-
pdf (Español (España))11
-
pdf 11
Referências
1. Krath J, Schürmann L, von Korflesch HFO. Theoretical basis of gamification. Comput Hum Behav. 2021, 125, 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963
2. Nevin CR, Westfall AO, Rodriguez JM, Dempsey DM, Cherrington A, Roy B, et al. Gamification in graduate medical education. Postgrad Med J. 2014, 90(1070), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132486
3. Berton A, Longo UG, Candela V, Fioravanti S, Giannone L, Arcangeli V, et al. Virtual reality and gamification in rehabilitation. J Clin Med. 2020, 9(8), 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082567
4. Bass GA, Chang CWJ, Sorce LR, Subramanian S, Laytin AD, Somodi R, et al. Gamification in critical care education. Crit Care Explor. 2024, 6(1), e1034. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001034
5. Balart CR, Parada DZ. Seguridad asistencial en medicina intensiva. ARS Medica. 2020, 45(4), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.11565/arsmed.v45i4.1743
6. Tolks D, Schmidt J, Kuhn S. The Role of AI in Serious Games and Gamification for Health: Scoping Review. JMIR Serious Games. 2024, 12(1), e48258. https://doi.org/10.2196/48258
7. Wang YF, Hsu YF, Fang KT, Kuo LT. Gamification in medical education. Med Educ Online. 2024, 29(1), 2302231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2024.2302231
8. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manage Learn Educ. 2005, 4(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
9. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
10. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
11. Dietl CA, Russell JC. Effects of technological advances in surgical education on quantitative outcomes from residency programs. J Surg Educ. 2016, 73(5), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.012
12. Zainuddin Z, Chu SKW, Shujahat M, Perera CJ. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educ Res Rev. 2020, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
13. Arenas-Contreras E, Ariza-Teheran L, Borja-Egher L, Diaz-Granados O, Mora-Cartusciello O, Thowinsson-Merizalde L, et al. Síntomas de ansiedad y depresión en trabajadores de la salud durante COVID-19. Psiquiatr Biol. 2024, 31(4), 100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psiq.2024.100505
14. Balart CR, Parada DZ. Seguridad asistencial en medicina intensiva. ARS Medica. 2020, 45(4), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.11565/arsmed.v45i4.1743
15. Tolks D, Schmidt J, Kuhn S. The Role of AI in Serious Games and Gamification for Health: Scoping Review. JMIR Serious Games. 2024, 12(1), e48258. https://doi.org/10.2196/48258
16. Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01
17. Sharma R, Gordon M, Dharamsi S, Gibbs T. Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94. Med Teach. 2015, 37(2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.970996
18. Mokadam NA, Lee R, Vaporciyan AA, Walker JD, Cerfolio RJ, Hermsen JL, et al. Gamification in thoracic surgical education: Using competition to fuel performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015, 150(5), 1052-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.071
19. Clarke DB, Kureshi N, Hong M, Sadeghi M, D’Arcy RCN. Simulation-based training for burr hole surgery instrument recognition. BMC Med Educ. 2016, 16(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0677-4
20. Kowalewski KF, Hendrie JD, Schmidt MW, Proctor T, Paul S, Garrow CR, et al. Validation of the mobile serious game application Touch SurgeryTM for cognitive training and assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017, 31(10), 4058-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5484-8
21. Graafland M, Bemelman WA, Schijven MP. Game-based training improves the surgeon’s situational awareness in the operation room: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2017, 31(10), 4093-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5491-9
22. Mandler AG. Touch Surgery: a Twenty-First Century Platform for Surgical Training. J Digit Imaging. 2018, 31(5), 585-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0062-8
23. Guérard-Poirier N, Beniey M, Meloche-Dumas L, Lebel-Guay F, Misheva B, Abbas M, et al. An Educational Network for Surgical Education Supported by Gamification Elements: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020, 9(12), e21273. https://doi.org/10.2196/21273
24. Nemirovsky DR, Garcia AJ, Gupta P, Shoen E, Walia N. Evaluation of Surgical Improvement of Clinical Knowledge Ops (SICKO), an Interactive Training Platform. J Digit Imaging. 2021, 34(4), 1067-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00455-8
25. Moran GW, Margolin EJ, Wang CN, DeCastro GJ. Using gamification to increase resident engagement in surgical training: Our experience with a robotic surgery simulation league. Am J Surg. 2022, 224(1), 321-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.02.046
26. Akbari F, Nasiri M, Rashidi N, Zonoori S, Amirmohseni L, Eslami J, et al. Comparison of the effects of virtual training by serious game and lecture on operating room novices’ knowledge and performance about surgical instruments setup: a multi-center, two-arm study. BMC Med Educ. 2022, 22(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03310-w
27. Masoumian Hosseini M, Sadat Manzari Z, Gazerani A, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Gazerani A, Rohaninasab M. Can gamified surgical sets improve surgical instrument recognition and student performance retention in the operating room? A multi-institutional experimental crossover study. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 23(1), 907. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04870-z
28. Khorammakan R, Omid A, Mirmohammadsadeghi M, Ghadami A. Puzzle game-based learning: a new approach to promote learning of principles of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 23(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04221-4
29. Hernansanz A, Rovira R, Basomba J, Comas R, Casals A. EndoTrainer: a novel hybrid training platform for endoscopic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023, 18(5), 899-908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02795-0
30. Nakamoto K, Jones DB, Adra SW. Gamification of robotic simulation to train general surgery residents. Surg Endosc. 2023, 37(4), 3136-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09855-y
31. Lang F, Willuth E, Haney CM, Felinska EA, Wennberg E, Kowalewski KF, et al. Serious gaming and virtual reality in the multimodal training of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized crossover study. Surg Endosc. 2023, 37(3), 2050-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09689-8
32. Mansoory MS, Yousefi D, Azizi SM, Rezaei L. Effectiveness of gamification-based teaching in approach to eye trauma: a randomized educational intervention trial. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024, 24(1), 457. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03713-y
33. St John A, Khalid MU, Masino C, Noroozi M, Alseidi A, Hashimoto DA, et al. LapBot-Safe Chole: validation of an artificial intelligence-powered mobile game app to teach safe cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024, 38(9), 5274-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10996-z
34. Hannani S, Salehi M, Amiri F, Ali Azadi N. Design and Effect of Neurosurgical Educational Software Using Gamification on Students’ Learning and Motivation. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024, 12(3), 189-98. https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2024.101235.1436
35. Ng MK, Mont MA, Bonutti PM. Integrating UVCeed Technology into Operating Rooms: A Narrative Review of Its Applications and Efficacy. Surg Technol Int. 2025, 45, sti45/1862. https://doi.org/10.52198/25.STI.45.OS1862
36. Hu J, Wang X, Chen R, Lu G, Zhang M, Huang X. Use of virtual simulation for regenerative endodontic training: randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2025, 25(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06543-y
37. Krishnamurthy K, O’Toole K, Gnanabhatla A, Pallerla D, Sridhar A, Lamba P, et al. Benefits of gamification. Clin Anat. 2022, 35(6), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23801
38. Lee LA, Lin YC, Cheng YC, Lin YL, Wang YM. Mobile technology in medical education. JMIR Med Educ. 2018, 4(1), e8. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.9186
39. Lee CY, Wang YF, Chen YH, Huang CC. Trends in gamification. BMC Med Educ. 2025, 25(1), 435. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-05231-z
40. Li Y, Zhang M, Liu J, Wang X. Virtual reality in nursing education. BMC Med Educ. 2025, 25(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-04712-3
41. Nylén-Eriksen M, Tveit B, Eide H. Gamification in nursing education. BMC Med Educ. 2025, 25(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-04789-w
42. Hwang GJ, Chang CY, Chen YS. Digital escape rooms in nursing. J Sci Educ Technol. 2024, 34(5), 1241-1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10141-9
43. Zhao J, Li H, Zheng Y, Zhang Y. Digital games-based learning. Asia-Pac Educ Res. 2022, 31(4), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00578-2
44. Van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, Jaarsma ADC, Georgiadis JR. Gamification in health education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021, 26(2), 683–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10017-3
45. Lavigne P, Yang N, Wang Z. Surgical simulation training. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020, 8(2), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-020-00275-9
46. Suárez-Gómez A, Vega-Peña NV. Efectividad de los juegos educacionales en la formación del cirujano: una revisión de alcance. Iatreia. 2022, 35(4), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.166
47. Van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, Jaarsma ADC, Georgiadis JR. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021, 26(2), 683-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3
48. Kurashima Y, Hirano S, Nakajima K, Hata S, Hiyama E. Simulation training in surgical residency. Surg Today. 2017, 47(7), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1425-3
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Múrcia
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista estão sujeitos aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Murcia (o editor) preserva os direitos económicos (direitos de autor) das obras publicadas e favorece e permite a sua reutilização ao abrigo da licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
2. Os trabalhos são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-NãoDerivada 4.0.
3. Condições de autoarquivamento. Os autores estão autorizados e incentivados a divulgar eletronicamente as versões pré-impressas (versão antes de ser avaliada e enviada à revista) e / ou pós-impressas (versão avaliada e aceita para publicação) de seus trabalhos antes da publicação, desde que favorece sua circulação e difusão mais precoce e com ela possível aumento de sua citação e alcance junto à comunidade acadêmica.
This is a Diamond Journal 
