Use of Exit Tickets and Audio Feedback in a Psychology and Communication subject: an exploratory pilot study.
Resumo
Introduction: The evolution of higher education demands strategies that foster active student engagement and enable continuous feedback. The Exit Ticket (ET) is an effective formative assessment tool typically used at the end of a lesson to gauge both conceptual understanding and methodological satisfaction, thereby allowing instructors to adjust content and teaching strategies accordingly. However, the use and evaluation of ETs in Health Sciences education have received limited attention. This pilot study examines the participation of Health Sciences students in a digital ET supplemented with additional explanations, and assesses their perception of the tool. Methodology: An anonymous digital ET was implemented during five voluntary theoretical sessions of the Psychology and Communication course in the Dentistry Degree programme at the University of Valencia (academic year 2024–2025; n = 75). Students were asked to indicate one concept they had learned and one they had not understood. The least understood concept of each session was subsequently addressed through an online audio explanation provided before the following lesson. Afterwards, 54 students completed a 4-point Likert-scale questionnaire to evaluate the strategy. Results: An average of 30.6 students attended the lessons, of whom 78.2% completed the ET. Among the students who responded to the evaluation survey, 89.1% had attended the sessions, and they rated the usefulness of the ET positively (median = 3 across all agreement items). Students reported that the tool facilitated learning reflection and enhanced communication with the instructor, thereby improving pedagogical practice. Additionally, 18.9% of surveyed students listened to the supplementary audio recordings during the first weeks, and all of them considered these explanations useful. Conclusion: The pilot implementation of the digital ET suggests its potential in Health Sciences education to promote metacognitive reflection and support fluid, formative communication between students and instructors. This strategy appears to enable the rapid adaptation of teaching to student needs. Future research should explore its scalability, applicability to other subjects, and direct impact on learning outcomes.
Downloads
Metrics
-
Resumo61
-
pdf 47
Referências
Kuh GD. Putting student engagement results to use: Lessons from the field. Assessment Update. 2005, 17(1),12-13. https://hdl.handle.net/2022/24182
Granda-Pinan AR, Rojo Bofill LM. Innovative learning environments as a response to the educative challenges of the 21st century. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives. 2024, (32), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.32.27803
Prieto JPA, Escobar AH. Exit tickets’ effect on engagement in college classrooms. EDULEARN16 Proceedings. 2016, 5915-5918. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0256
Marzano RJ. The New Art and Science of Teaching: More Than Fifty New Instructional Strategies for Academic Success. 2017, Bloomington (IN): Solution Tree Press; ISBN 9781943874965.
Knol MH, Dolan CV, Mellenbergh GJ, Maas HLJ van der. Measuring the Quality of University Lectures: Development and Validation of the Instructional Skills Questionnaire (ISQ). PLOS ONE. 2016, 11(2), e0149163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149163
Russo RA, Griffeth BT, Combs H, Dinsell V, Palka JM, Morreale MK, et al. Elements of an Excellent Psychiatry Clerkship Experience: A Survey Study of Graduating Medical Students. Acad Psychiatry. 2021, 45(2), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01373-z
Cantwell C, Saadat S, Sakaria S, Wiechmann W, Sudario G. Escape box and puzzle design as educational methods for engagement and satisfaction of medical student learners in emergency medicine: survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2022, 22(1), 518. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03585-3
Cavaleiro I, de Carvalho Filho MA. Harnessing student feedback to transform teachers: Role of emotions and relationships. Med Educ. 2024, 58(6), 750-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15264
Brookhart S. Develop a Student-Centered Mind-set for Formative Assessment. Voices from the Middle. 2013, 2(21), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.58680/vm201324462
Fowler K, Windschitl M, Richards J. Exit Tickets. The Science Teacher. 2019, 86(8), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2019.12293416
Pavone KJ. Using Exit Tickets to Foster Competency-Based Learning in Nursing Education. Nurse Educator. 2025, 50(4), E212. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001862
Danley AE, Ann McCoy P, Rahila Weed P. Exit Tickets Open the Door to University Learning. InSight. 2016, 11, 48-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1110134
MacDermott R, Mornah D, MacDermott H. Enhancing principles of marketing education through formative assessment: exploring the impact of exit tickets on student engagement and effort. Marketing Education Review. 2024, 35(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2024.2438624
Rodriguez M, le Roux C, Melville M. Iteratively-Designed Exit Tickets Enhances Student Learning. College Teaching. 2024, 0(0), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2024.2355210
Baron LM. Formative Assessment at Work in the Classroom. The Mathematics Teacher. 2016, 1(110), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.110.1.0046
Khoshgoftar Z, Barkhordari-Sharifabad M. Medical students’ reflective capacity and its role in their critical thinking disposition. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 23(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04163-x
Heydari S, Beigzadeh A. Medical students’ perspectives of reflection for their professional development. BMC Med Educ. 2024, 24(1), 1399. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06401-2
Srivastava TK, Mishra V, Waghmare LS. Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for better learning in pre-clinical medical education: A controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018, 9(12), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/35622.11969
Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ. 2006, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Múrcia

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista estão sujeitos aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Murcia (o editor) preserva os direitos económicos (direitos de autor) das obras publicadas e favorece e permite a sua reutilização ao abrigo da licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
2. Os trabalhos são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-NãoDerivada 4.0.
3. Condições de autoarquivamento. Os autores estão autorizados e incentivados a divulgar eletronicamente as versões pré-impressas (versão antes de ser avaliada e enviada à revista) e / ou pós-impressas (versão avaliada e aceita para publicação) de seus trabalhos antes da publicação, desde que favorece sua circulação e difusão mais precoce e com ela possível aumento de sua citação e alcance junto à comunidade acadêmica.
![]()












