Curricular insertion of clinical simulation in Medical Microbiology: design and implementation.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical simulation has become a key resource in medical education, but its systematic integration into basic subjects such as Medical Microbiology remains limited in the Spanish context, which makes it difficult for students to connect microbiological content with clinical reasoning and the reasoned ordering of microbiological tests. Aim: Analyze the academic results and the perceived usefulness of the clinical simulation practices carried out in this subject. Methods: A descriptive observational study was carried out of the grades obtained in the part of the course linked to simulation-based practice sessions using clinical interviews on infectious syndromes in a third-year Medical Microbiology course (academic years 2012-2013 to 2025-2026). The practice sessions were structured around simulated clinical interviews on common infectious syndromes and were assessed using three successive formats (short-answer questions in a practical workbook, an at-home online test and an in-person online test), applying descriptive statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA. Open-ended student comments on the perceived educational value of the experience were also reviewed. Results: Mean scores ranged from 7.54 to 9.67 out of 10, with high medians and low to moderate standard deviations. The ANOVA showed significant differences between formats (F = 466.92; p < 0.001), with higher scores in the at-home online test and subsequent stability in the in-person online test. These findings suggest that academic results should be interpreted cautiously, since part of the observed variation may be explained by the assessment format rather than by the instructional intervention alone. Students rated the practice sessions very positively, highlighting their usefulness for understanding the clinical relevance of Microbiology, organizing their study around infectious syndromes and preparing for OSCEs and clinical rotations. Conclusions: The simulation of clinical interviews in Medical Microbiology is a sustainable teaching innovation, associated with high and consistent academic results, and a training utility clearly perceived by students, which promotes the basic-clinical integration in the degree in Medicine and offers a model that can be transferred to other faculties of different educational systems interested in incorporating simulation in basic subjects.
Downloads
-
Abstract2
-
pdf (Español (España))0
-
pdf0
-
xml (Español (España))0
References
1. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011, 306, 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1234
2. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013, 35, e1511-e1530. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
3. Alonso-Peña M, Álvarez Álvarez C. Clinical simulation in health education: a systematic review. Invest Educ Enferm. 2023, 41, e08. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e08
4. Muñoz G, Sierra R. La simulación clínica en la educación médica moderna: revisión de revisiones. Rev Eugenio Espejo. 2025, 19, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.22.08
5. Abreu JM, Castelo-Branco M. Simulación clínica en la formación en Medicina Intensiva: evidencia, modelos europeos y oportunidades para Portugal. Rev Esp Educ Med. 2025, 6, 657461. https://doi.org/10.6018.edumed.657461
6. Corvetto M, Bravo MP, Montaña R, et al. Simulación en educación médica: una sinopsis. Rev Med Chil. 2013, 141, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000100010
7. Rognoni G, Benet P, Castro A, et al. La simulación clínica en la educación médica. Ventajas e inconvenientes del aprendizaje al lado del paciente y en entorno simulado. Med Clin Pract. 2024, 7, 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpsp.2024.100459
8. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007, 29, 855-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701775453
9. Salam A, Alsharkawy A, Abdelhalim AT, et al. Use of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) as a Valid and Reliable Assessment Tool in Medical Education. Int. J. Hum. Health Sci. 2024, 8, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.31344/ijhhs.v8i1.612
10. Saceda D, Fonda P, Moreno ÓM, et al. Objective structured clinical examination as an assessment tool of clinical competence in undergraduate dermatology. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017, 108, 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2016.10.016
11. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013, 35, e867-e898. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
12. Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, et al. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014, 48, 657-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12432
13. Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine. 2024, 103, e38813. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813
14. Castellanos L, Broch MJ, Palacios D, et al. Effect of a competence based medical education program on training quality in Intensive Care Medicine. Med Intensiva. 2024, 48, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2024.502126
15. Butragueño L, Zanin A, López-Herce J, Mencía S. Uso de la simulación durante la pandemia COVID-19 en las UCIP españolas. Nuevos retos en educación médica. An Pediatr (Barc). 2021, 95, 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2021.06.007
Copyright (c) 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.





This is a Diamond Journal 





