Point-of-Care Ultrasound as an active learning tool for medical students: a before-and-after quasi-experimental study.
Abstract
Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become established as a cross-disciplinary competency in contemporary medical practice. However, its integration into undergraduate medical education remains heterogeneous and is limited by the availability of instructors, curricular time, and technical resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational impact of EcoEduca, a hybrid educational intervention based on clinical ultrasound, active learning, and pre/post-intervention assessment. Methods: A single-group quasi-experimental study with before-and-after assessment and a post-intervention cross-sectional survey was conducted. The intervention combined online educational materials, ultrasound cases, practice guides, hands-on ultrasound sessions, and a structured ultrasound interpretation test composed of 10 cases. Pre/post-intervention scores, self-reported adherence, perceived self-efficacy, and satisfaction were analyzed using 1-to-5 Likert scales. The primary analysis of pre/post-intervention change was performed in students with paired responses. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for related samples were used. Results: 27 medical students from years 3 to 6 completed the pre-intervention assessment and 29 completed the post-intervention assessment. The paired analysis included 22 students with linkable pre- and post-intervention assessments. Mean scores increased from 7.45/10 to 8.82/10, with a mean difference of 1.36 points (95% CI: 0.62–2.11; p=0.0019). Thirteen students improved their scores, eight showed no change, and one demonstrated a decrease. The post-intervention survey included 29 responses; 28 students (96.6%) reported completing the mandatory materials and 29 (100%) participated in more than five hands-on practice sessions. Mean global self-efficacy was 4.31/5, mean composite overall satisfaction was 4.78/5, and mean overall satisfaction specifically with EcoEduca was 4.93/5. Conclusions: EcoEduca was associated with improved performance in a structured ultrasound interpretation assessment, along with high adherence, satisfaction, and perceived self-efficacy. Given the single-group design and small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence of feasibility and potential educational benefit.
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
pdf (Español (España))0
-
pdf0
-
xml (Español (España))0
References
1. Díaz-Gómez JL, Mayo PH, Koenig SJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2021, 385, 1593-1602. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1916062
2. Hoppmann RA, Mladenovic J, Melniker L, et al. International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students. Ultrasound J. 2022, 14, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00279-1
3. Weiskittel TM, Lachman N, Bhagra A, et al. Team-Based Ultrasound Objective Structured Practice Examination (OSPE) in the Anatomy Course. Anat Sci Educ. 2021, 14, 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2069
4. Winter L, Neubauer R, Weimer J, et al. Peer teachers as ultrasound instructors? A systematic literature review of peer teaching concepts in undergraduate ultrasound education. BMC Med Educ. 2024, 24, 1369. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06345-7
5. Ferre RM, Kaine JC, Lobo D, et al. A shared point of care ultrasound curriculum for graduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2024, 24, 843. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05797-1
6. Bapuji R, Eagles D, Ferreira N, et al. Comparison of peer-assisted learning with expert-led learning in medical school ultrasound education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Emerg Med. 2024, 26, 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00663-x
7. Dupriez F, Hall A, Diop T, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound training in undergraduate education in the European Union: current situation and perspectives. Ultrasound J. 2024, 16, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-024-00361-w
8. American College of Emergency Physicians. Education and Training. ACEP EM Ultrasound Section. 2021. https://www.acep.org/emultrasound/resources/education-and-training/
9. Zervides C, Kefala-Karli P, Sassis L. Importance of ultrasound education in undergraduate medical curriculum: a survey study based on first-year medical students’ perception. Ultrasound Q. 2020, 36, 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000540
10. Dietrich CF, Fraser AG, Dong Y, et al. Managing incidental findings reported by medical, sonography and other students performing educational ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022, 48, 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.015
Copyright (c) 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.





This is a Diamond Journal 





