Computer-assisted medical image examination as a complementary exam concerning initial clinical studies.
Abstract
Introduction. The evaluation of medical students during the medical course can have different types of examinations, including written and practical exams. Computer-assisted evaluation has been made available by widely available technology. Methods. We devised a computer-assisted online medical image examination to stand as a complementary exam in a Medical School examination concerning initial clinical studies. The exam was in the multiple-choice format, showing for each question a list of 5 diagnoses, one of which to be chosen, attempting at eliciting fast visual pattern recognition. The exam was carried out by using Moodle software. Non on-site exams were controlled with simultaneous face monitoring by using the Zoom software. The exam included physical examination findings, electrocardiograms, chest X-rays and CT scan, as well as neurologic disease findings. Results. The exam was completed by 264 students, out of 273 enrolled students. The average grade was 15.4 (standard deviation of 2.9) /20, with a range of 6.7-20.0. A total of 9 students received a rating under 10/20. Two students experienced technical difficulties and quit the exam, later replaced by a practical clinical additional exam. Conclusions. Computer-assisted evaluation has been made available by widely available technology. We devised a computer-assisted online medical image examination to stand as a complementary exam in a Medical School examination concerning initial clinical studies. This exam deals with a real and relevant problem: the importance of visual diagnostics in Medicine. It aims at stimulating a different way of thinking, when compared to written tests. Given the easy availability of this type of medical image online exam, alternatives using written text to question about medical images are called into question.
Downloads
-
Abstract59
-
pdf44
References
1. Garcia-Seoane JJ, Ramos-Rincon JM, Lara-Munoz JP, et al. Changes in the Objective Structured Clinical Examination of University Schools of Medicine during COVID-19. Experience with a computer-based case simulation OSCE. Rev Clin Esp 2021, 221, 456-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2021.01.004
2. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
3. Cartledge S, Ward D, Stack R, Terry E. Adaptations in clinical examinations of medical students in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022, 22, 607. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03662-7
4. Pérez Baena AV, Sendra Portero F. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Main aspects and the role of imaging. Radiología. 2023, 65, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.09.006
5. Facione NC, Facione PA. Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment. In: Critical thinking and clinical reasoning in the health sciences: A teaching anthology. Millbrae, California: California Academic Press; 2008.
6. Elsalem L, Al-Azzam N, Jum’ah AA, Obeidat N. Remote E-exams during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of students’ preferences and academic dishonesty in faculties of medical sciences. Ann Med Surg. 2021, 62, 326-333. https://doi.org/.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.054
7. Meulmeester FL, Dubois EA, Krommenhoek‑van Es C, de Jong PGM, Langers AMJ. Medical Students’ Perspectives on Online Proctoring During Remote Digital Progress Test. Med Sci Educ. 2021, 31, 1773-1777. https://doi.org/.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01420-w
Copyright (c) 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.












