At the heart of the classroom: student perspective on teaching methods in Cardiology

Authors

  • Maria Judith Tudela Aybar Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga.
  • Jose I. Larrubia-Valle Unidad de Gestion Clinica Cardiología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga. Málaga https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-3385
  • Cristian Pelaez Berdun Área del Corazón, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. Málaga https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9596-4926
  • Ada del Mar Carmona-Segovia Área del Corazón, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. Málaga
  • Francisco Javier Pavón-Morón Área del Corazón, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. Málaga
  • Manuel F. Jiménez-Navarro Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.646091
Keywords: teaching methods, medical education, active learning, practical skills, cardiovascular system

Abstract

Medical education has evolved towards a focus on competencies and practical skills. In response to changing demands, medical faculties have adopted methodologies that promote active and participative learning, enhancing student motivation and performance. Tools such as Miller's Pyramid and Bloom's Taxonomy guide planning and evaluation, integrating levels of knowledge with practical skills and clinical competence. The aim of this investigation was to study more deeply the student perspective on the teaching methods applied in the "Diseases of the Circulatory System" subject. To achieve that objective, a questionnaire was designed to assess the evaluation of teaching methods in Cardiovascular Medicine and to identify statistical differences between variables. This was distributed online to students from the University of Malaga and included sections on sociodemographic variables, perception of acquired competencies, preferred teaching methods, and new teaching assumptions. The study involved 121 students (32.2% male and 67.8% female), with a median grade point average of 7.8. The majority were in their sixth year (57%), followed by fifth year (24.8%) and fourth year (18.2%). Knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors was acquired by 99.2% of students, while cardiopulmonary auscultation was acquired by only 43.8%. The most valued teaching methods were clinical practices, seminars and workshops, and problem-based learning. Notably, lectures with a more dynamic approach were widely welcomed. In conclussion, integrated teaching in Cardiology enhances learning; students perceive the need to implement dynamic and practical methods that reflect real clinical scenarios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    271
  • pdf (Español (España))
    247
  • pdf
    247

References

Zhang S, Zhu D, Wang X, et al. Effects of six teaching strategies on medical students: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2024 [Citado 27 de febrero de 2024]; 14(1):e079716. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079716

Larrubia Valle JI, Peláez Berdún C, Rodríguez Capitán J, Pavón Morón FJ, Romero Cuevas M, Jimenez-Navarro M. Evaluación de la adquisición de competencias en sistema cardiovascular en Medicina: autopercepción, asistencia a clase y rendimiento académico. Rev Esp Edu Med [Internet]. 2023 [citado 27 de febrero de 2024]; 4(1). Disponible en https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.548881

Sureda-Demeulemeester E, Ramis-Palmer C, Sesé-Abad A. La evaluación de competencias en Medicina. Rev Clin Esp. [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 27 de febrero de 2024]; 217(9):534-42. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2017.05.004

Ruiz-Mori, E. Clases teóricas, ¿cosa del pasado en la docencia de ciencias básicas en Medicina? Horiz Med [Internet]. 2023 [Citado 27 de febrero de 2024];23(1):e2198. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2023.v23n1.00

Paz-Bonilla ME, Malca-Iturregui LC, León-Jiménez FE. Clases magistrales y pregrado en medicina… ¿un dinosaurio en extinción?. FEM [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 27 de febrero de 2024]; 20(3):141-141. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2014-98322017000300009

Domínguez-Torres LC, Vega-Peña NV. Las pirámides de la educación médica: una síntesis sobre su conceptualización y utilidad. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2023 [Citado 27 de febrero de 2024]; 74(2): 163-74. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3994

Millán Núñez-Cortés J, Gutiérrez-Fuentes JA. “Enseñar a ser médicos”: un análisis de opinión de los médicos implicados en la docencia de la clínica práctica (I). Conclusiones del análisis cualitativo y metodología para un estudio cuantitativo. Educ Med [Internet]. 2012 [Citado 27 de febrero de 2024]; 15(3):143–7. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-18132012000300006

de Andrade Gomes J, Marciel Braga LA, Pereira Cabral B, Matos Lopes R, Batista Mota F. Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education: A Global Research Landscape of the Last Ten Years (2013–2022). Medi Sci Educ [Internet]. 2024. [Citado 14 de abril de 2024]. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02003-1

El-Baba M, McLaren J, Argintaru N. The HEARTS ECG workshop: a novel approach to resident and student ECG education. Int J Emerge Med [Internet]. 2023 [Citado 14 de abril de 2024]; 1;16(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00559-0

Baloch MH, Shahid S, Saeed S, Nasir A, Mansoor S. Does the Implementation of Flipped Classroom Model Improve the Learning Outcomes of Medical College Students? A Single Centre Analysis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak [Internet]. 2022 [Citado 14 de abril de 2024]; 32(12):1544–1547. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2022.12.1544

Published
21-02-2025
How to Cite
Tudela Aybar, M. J., Larrubia-Valle, J. I., Pelaez Berdun, C., Carmona-Segovia, A. del M., Pavón-Morón, F. J., & Jiménez-Navarro, M. F. (2025). At the heart of the classroom: student perspective on teaching methods in Cardiology. Spanish Journal of Medical Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.646091

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.